Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:36:08.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should Peacemakers Take Sides? Major Power Mediation, Coercion, and Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

KATJA FAVRETTO
KATJA FAVRETTO*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
*
Katja Favretto is Faculty Fellow, Department of Political Science, University of California at Los Angeles, 4289 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472 (favretto@ucla.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on powerful third parties whose interests in a conflict are closely aligned with a single disputant's interests. I show that such third-party bias reveals private information about an intervener's willingness to secure an agreement using force. When a highly biased power intervenes in a crisis, a peaceful settlement is likely because warring parties are certain the third party will enforce an agreement by military means. When an intervener shows less favoritism, negotiations tend to fail because the disputants doubt that it is committed to use force. Peace is again more likely when the third party is unbiased because such a party behaves as a mediator, seeking agreements both adversaries find acceptable. These findings, coupled with evidence from U.S. and British interventions in the Balkans, suggest a possible explanation for why major power intervention can bring about drastically different outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 248 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beardsley, Kyle C. 2008. “Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 723–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Kyle C., Quinn, David M., Biswas, Bidisha, and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. 2006. “Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Christopher. 1995. Yugoslavia's Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course, and Consequences. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Houston, Allison. 1996. “The Study of International Mediation: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence.” In Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation, ed. Bercovitch, Jacob. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 11–35.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob, Anagnoson, J. Theodore, and Wille, Donnadette L.. 1991. “Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations.” Journal of Peace Research 28 (1): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bien, William J. 2000. “The Oslo Channel: Benefits of a Neutral Facilitator to Secret Negotiations.” In Words over War: Mediation and Arbitration to Prevent Deadly Conflict, ed. Greenberg, Melanie C., Barton, J. H., and McGuinness, M. E.. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brookmire, David A., and Sistrunk, Frank. 1980. “The Effects of Perceived Ability and Impartiality of Mediators and Time Pressure on Negotiation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (2): 311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., and Zorick, Ethan R.. 1997. “Capabilities, Perception and Escalation.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, John, and Dukes, Frank. 1990. Conflict: Practices, Settlement, and Resolution. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall L. 1985. “The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice.” Journal of Politics 47 (2): 530–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John C. 1976. Successful Negotiation: Trieste 1954. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carnevale, Peter J., and Arad, Sharon. 1996. “Bias and ImpartiaIity in InternationaI Mediation.” In Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation, ed. Bercovitch, Jacob. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cho, In-Koo, and Kreps, David M.. 1987. “Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (2): 179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, Winston. 1962. The Second World War. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H. 2000. Getting to Dayton: The Making of America's Bosnia Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H., and O'Hanlon, Michael E.. 2000. Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W., and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D. 1954a. “Dwight D. Eisenhower to John Foster Dulles, Oct. 27, 1954” (No. 1128). In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, ed. Galambos, L. and van Ee, D.. http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/first-term/documents/1128.cfm (Accessed April 12, 2007).Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D. 1954b. “Dwight D. Eisenhower to Josip Broz Tito, Sep. 10, 1954” (No. 1060). In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, ed. Galambos, L. and van Ee, D.. http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/first-term/documents/1060.cfm (Accessed April 12, 2007).Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Ronald J. 1995. “Pacific, Impartial Third-Party Intervention in International Conflict: A Review and Analysis.” In Beyond Confrontation: Learning Conflict Resolution in the Post-Cold War Era, ed. Fisher, Ronald J., Vasquez, J. A., Johnson, J. T., Jaffe, S., and Stamato, L.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia P. 2004. “Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, Daniel. 1976. “Conditions Affecting the Effectiveness of International Mediation.” Peace Science Society (International) Papers 26 (1): 67–84.Google Scholar
Gent, Stephen E. 2008. “Going in When It Counts: Military Intervention and the Outcome of Civil Conflicts.” International Studies Quarterly 52 (4): 713–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilady, Lilach, and Russett, Bruce. 2002. “Peacemaking and Conflict Resolution.” In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, J. Michael. 2001. “Moments of Opportunity: Recognizing Conditions of Ripeness for International Mediation between Enduring Rivals.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (6): 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, David. 2001. War in a Time of Peace: Bush, Clinton and the Generals. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Isakovié, Radosav. 1973. Kosovelova Brigada. Ljubljana, Slovenija: Knjižnica NOV in POS.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Harry, and Dagne, Ted. 1997. “Congress and the Somali Crisis.” In Learning from Somalia: The Lessons of Armed Humanitarian Intervention, ed. Clarke, Walter and Herbst, Jeffrey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 191–204.Google Scholar
Judah, Tim. 2000. Kosovo: War and Revenge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kardelj, Edvard. 1980. Boj za priznanje in neodvisnost nove Jugoslavije, 1944-1957. Ljubljana, Slovenija: Državna založba Slovenije.Google Scholar
Kleiboer, Marieke. 2002. “Great Power Mediation: Using Leverage to Make Peace?” In Studies in International Mediation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, ed. Bercovitch, Jacob. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2003. “Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2006. “When Can Mediators Build Trust?” American Political Science Review 100 (3): 449–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederach, John Paul, and Wehr, Paul. 1991. “Mediating Conflict in Central America.” Journal of Peace Research 28 (1): 85–98.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett A. 2003a. “Alliance Reliability in Times of War: Explaining State Decisions to Violate Treaties.” International Organization 57 (4): 801–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett A. 2003b. “Do Alliances Deter Aggression? The Influence of Military Alliances on the Initiation of Militarized Interstate Disputes.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 427–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett A., Long, Andrew G., and Mitchell, Sara. 2000. “Reevaluating Alliance Reliability: Specific Threats, Specific Promises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (5): 686–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. 1998. Kosovo: A Short History. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1989. “Capabilities, Uncertainty, and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (4): 941–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1999. “How Could Trade Affect Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 481–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Marissa. 1998. “When Biased Advice Is a Good Thing: Information and Foreign Policy Decision Making.” International Interactions 24 (4): 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenni, Pietro. 1981. Tempo di guerra fredda, diari 1943-1956. Milano: Sugarco.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1996. “Stability and the Distribution of Power.” World Politics 48: 239–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princen, Thomas. 1992. “Intermediaries in International Conflict.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina R. 1992. Nationalism and Federalism in Yugoslavia, 1962-1991. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rauchhaus, Robert W. 2006. “Asymmetric Information, Mediation, and Conflict Management.” World Politics 58 (2): 207–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. 2002a. Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Interventions and Intrastate Conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. 2002b. “Third Party Interventions and the Duration of Intrastate Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50 (1): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand, G. W. 2004. Defending the West: The Truman-Churchill Correspondence, 1945–1960. Westport, CT: Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Anne E. 2002. “The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes.” International Organization 561 (1): 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A., and Gerner, Deborah J.. 2004. “An Event Data Analysis of Third-Party Mediation in the Middle East and Balkans.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (3): 310–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1998. “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises.” American Political Science Review 92 (4): 829–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. “Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.” International Organization 52 (2): 233–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1): 32–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signorino, Curtis S., and Ritter, Jeffrey M.. 1999. “Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav L. 2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1996a. “Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (1): 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1996b. “To Intervene or Not to Intervene: A Biased Decision.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (1): 16–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1998. “International Crises and Domestic Politics.” American Political Science Review 92 (3): 623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair, and Stam, Alan. 2003. “Mediation and Peacekeeping in a Random Walk Model of Civil and Interstate War.” International Studies Review 5 (4): 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James D. D. 1994. “Mediator Impartiality: Banishing the Chimera.” Journal of Peace Research 31 (4): 445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. S. 1998. “Stevenson to Foreign Office, June 21, 1945” (No. 119). In British Documents on Foreign Affairs: Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office Confidential Print, Part III, Series F: Europe (v. 26), eds. Preston, Paul and Partridge, Michael. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Tarchiani, Alberto. 1955. Dieci anni tra Roma e Washington. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 1982. The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 1992. “The Superpowers as Mediators.” In Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management, ed. Bercovitch, Jacob and Rubin, Jeffrey Z.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Touval, Saadia, and Zartman, William I., eds. 1985. “International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S., ed. 1955. Memoirs. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. 1949. “The Yugoslav Dilemma.” http://nsarchive.chadwyck.com/nsa/documents/SE/00054/all.pdf (accessed June 20, 2007).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1949. “Economic Relations Between the United States and Yugoslavia.” http://nsarchive.chadwyck.com/nsa/documents/PD/00052/all.pdf (accessed June 20, 2007).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1999. “Rambouillet Agreement: Interim Agreement for Peace and Self-Government in Kosovo.” http://www.state.gov/www/regions/eur/ksvo_rambouillet_text.html (accessed June 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2003. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization 51 (3): 335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittam, J. R. 1991. “Drawing the Line: Britain and the Emergence of the Trieste Question, January 1941–May 1945.” English Historical Review 106 (419): 346–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Young, Kathleen, Asal, Victor, and Quinn, David. 2003. “Mediating International Crises: Cross-National and Experimental Perspectives.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (3): 279–301.Google Scholar
Woods, James L. 1997. “U.S. Government Decisionmaking Processes during Humanitarian Operations in Somalia.” In Learning from Somalia: The Lessons of Armed Humanitarian Intervention, ed. Clarke, Walter and Herbst, Jeffrey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 151–72.Google Scholar
Young, Oran. 1967. The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.