Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:02:56.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eastern Europe and The Historian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Henry L Roberts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is not my intention in this paper to discuss those two issues that always seem to be debated whenever Eastern Europe is mentioned: the argument over the importance or utility of the study of its history, and the game of defining its precise geographic limits or its internal unity. These issues may not have been exhausted-though they are pretty limp by now—but I think it may be more profitable to turn our attention to some of the substantive and methodological problems that confront the working historian, once he has accepted this area as a field of proper concern and once he has arrived at his own definition of its scope and limits.

More specifically, I should like to consider some of the problems connected with the intimate but ambiguous relationship of Eastern Europe-including Russia-to Western Europe, both as an object of historical study and as an influence on historical research and writing.

Type
Notes and Comment
Information
American Slavic and East European Review , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , October 1961 , pp. 509 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grothusen, Klaus-Detlev, “Die russische Geschichtswissenschaft des 19. Jahrhunderts als Forschungsaufgabe,”Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (Munich, 1960), VIII, No. 1, 53–54.Google Scholar

2 Rewriting Russian History, ed. Black, Cyril E. (New York, 1956).Google Scholar

3 Gasiorowski, Zygmunt,“The Conquest Theory of the Genesis of the Polish State,” Speculum October, 1955, pp. 55–60 Google Scholar.

4 Iorga, Nicolae,La Place des Roumains dans I'histoire universelle (Bucharest, 1935).Google Scholar

5 ,No. 8, August, 1960, pp. 65–95.

6 Grothusen, op. cit., p . 53.

7 Roberts, Henry L.,Rumania (New Haven, 1951), pp. 339–40.Google Scholar

8 Weidlé, Wladimir, Poccuu (New York, 1956), p.13.Google Scholar

9 For two depressing examples, see E. Ambartsumov, “Historians in Congress in Stock-holm,” World Marxist Review, November, 1960, p . 9, and No. 8, August, 1960, pp. 3–18.