Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:49:34.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matching in Epidemiology as a Paradigm for Twin Research on the Etiology of Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Colin White
Colin White*
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article is a review of the technique of matching as it applies to epidemiological investgations of the etiology of disease. It is written for researchers who wish to use twins as the matched pairs in studies of this type.

Keywords

BiometryStatisticsTwinsEpidemiologic methodsFollow-up studiesSociometric technics
Type
Review Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 77 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1981

References

REFERENCES

1.Chapin, FS (1947): “Experimental Designs in Sociological Research.” New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
2.Cederlof, R, Friberg, L, Lundman, T (1977): The interactions of smoking, environment and heredity and their implications for disease etiology. A report of epidemiological studies on the Swedish Twin Registries. Acta Med Scand Suppl 612:1–128.Google Scholar
3.Freedman, D, Pisani, R, Purves, R (1978): “Statistics.” W. W. Norton and Co., New York.Google Scholar
4.Greenwood, E (1945): “Experimental Sociology: A Study in Method.” New York: King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
5.Lane-Claypon, JE (1926): A further report on cancer of the breast. Reports on Public Health and medical subjects. No. 32, Ministry of Health. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
6.Locket, S, Swann, PG, Grieve, WSM (1951): Methonium compounds in the treatment of hypertension. Br Med J 1:778–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Lombard, H, Doering, C (1928): Cancer studies in Massachusetts. 2. Habits, characteristics and environment of individuals with and without cancer. N Engl J Med 198:481–487.Google Scholar
8.Pearl, R (1923): The age at death of the parents of the tuberculous and the cancerous. Am J Hyg 3: 71:89.Google Scholar
9.Samuels, ML (1979): How case-matching can reduce design efficiency in retrospective studies. Technical Report No. 50, Divisoin of Biostatistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
10.U.S. Public Health Service (1979): Smoking and health: A report of the Surgeon General U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Public Health Service, DHEW Publication No. 7950066.Google Scholar
11.Yanagawa, T (1979): Designing case-control studies. Environ Health Perspect 32:143–156.Google Scholar