Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:47:38.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perinatal Outcome after Leave of Absence from Work for Twin-Pregnant Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

H. Rydhstroem*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
L. Bakketeig
Affiliation:
Medical Birth Registry, National Institute of Public Health, Olso, Norway
P. Magnus
Affiliation:
Medical Birth Registry, National Institute of Public Health, Olso, Norway
L. B. Knudsen
Affiliation:
Statistics, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
H. Wedel
Affiliation:
Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden (Hakan.Rydhstrom@gyn.lu.se)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aim. To evaluate the association between the incidence of leave of absence from work and perinatal outcome for the twin-pregnant woman.

Material and methods. A 20.2% sample of all twin-pregnant women between 1982 and 1988 (1,331/6,602) was taken at random from the entire material of twin deliveries in Sweden, archived at the Medical Birth Registry (MBR), National Board of Health and Welfare. For each woman in the sample, information on period(s) and reasons for leave of absence from work during pregnancy was obtained by inquiry to all Regional Health Insurance Offices throughout Sweden. A comparison of perinatal outcome was also made with information from the Danish Fertility Database and the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry.

Results. Duration of leave from work increased from 58 days in 1982 to 97 days in 1988 (trend analysis; t = 7.9, p <0.001). No association was seen between perinatal mortality for twins weighing. < 1,500 g and changes in the incidence of leave of absence. The incidence of twins with a birthweight < 1,500 g varied among the three countries, increasing significantly only in Sweden (trend analysis χ2 = 20.3, p <0.0001).

Conclusion. Although the number of days of leave of absence increased by 60%, there was no obvious association with perinatal mortality for twins weighing < 1,500 g. The incidence of Swedish twins with a birthweight < 1,500 g increased significantly, indicating that the effect of leave of absence from work on perinatal outcome may be less effective than previously thought.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1999

References

REFERENCES

1.Åberg, A, Skjaerris, J (1982): Prevention of prematurity in twin pregnancy by orally administered terbutalin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 108: 3940.Google Scholar
2.Chamberlain, G, Garcia, J (1983): Pregnant women at work. The Lancet i: 228230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cnattingius, S, Ericson, A, Gunnarskog, J. Källén, B (1990): A quality study of a Medical Birth Registry. Scand J Soc Med 18: 143148.Google Scholar
4.Hartikainen-Sorri, AL, Kauppila, A, Tuimala, R (1980): Inefficacy of 17-alpha- hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of prematurity in twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 56: 692695.Google Scholar
5.Henriksen, TB (1995): Epidemiological studies of paid work during pregnancy with focus on ergonomie and psychosocial factors in relation to pregnancy duration and intra-uterine growth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74: 670672.Google Scholar
6.Hoffman, HJ, Bakketeig, L (1984): Risk factors associated with the occurrence of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27: 539552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Knudsen, LB: Fertility trends in Denmark in the 1980s. A Register Based Sociodemographic Analysis of Fertility Trends in Copenhagen; Statistics Denmark 1993.Google Scholar
8.MacLennan, AH, Green, RC, O'Shea, R, Brookes, C, Morris, D (1990): Routine hospital admission in twin pregnancy between 26 and 30 weeks' gestation. The Lancet 335: 26762679.Google Scholar
9.Murphy, JF, Dauncey, M, Newcombe, R, Elborne, D (1984): Employment in pregnancy: prevalence, maternal characteristics, perinatal outcome. The Lancet i: 11631166.Google Scholar
10.Myllynen, L (1991): Work during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 70: 629630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Population Changes. Official Statistics of Sweden. Statistical reports 1982-88. Stockholm: Civiltryck Ltd., 19831989.Google Scholar
12.Rydhström, H (1988): Twin pregnancy and the effects of prophylactic leave of absence on pregnancy duration and birthweight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67: 8184.Google Scholar
13.Rydhström, H (1990): Factors influencing twin perinatal mortality. Thesis. Lund: Bloms Tryckeri Ltd.Google Scholar
14.Saurel, MJ, Kaminski, M (1983): Pregnant women at work. The Lancet i: 474.Google Scholar
15.Saurel-Cubizolles, MJ, Kaminski, M (1986): Work in pregnancy: its evolving relationship with perinatal outcome (review). Soc Sci Med 22: 431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Weekes, ARL, Menzies, DN, Boer, CH (1977): The relative efficacy of bed rest, cervical suture and no treatment in the management of twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84: 161164.Google Scholar