Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:45:54.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological characterization of Achai cattle in sedentary and transhumant systems in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2013

M. Saleem*
Affiliation:
Directorate General (Extension) Livestock and Dairy Development Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan
I. Rahim
Affiliation:
Mountain Society Research Centre, University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
S. Jalali
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
H. Rueff
Affiliation:
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
M. Khan
Affiliation:
Directorate General (Extension) Livestock and Dairy Development Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan
D. Maselli
Affiliation:
Mountain Society Research Centre, University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
U. Wiesmann
Affiliation:
Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
S. Muhammad
Affiliation:
Directorate General (Extension) Livestock and Dairy Development Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan
*
Correspondence to: M. Saleem, Directorate General (Extension) Livestock and Dairy Development Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan. email: saleemtalash@yahoo.com
Get access

Summary

Achai is an as yet undocumented but well-adapted cattle breed of the Hindu Kush Mountains of northern Pakistan, which is reared under sedentary farming system (SFS) and transhumant farming system (TFS). This paper compares the morphological (physical and morphometric) characteristics of this cattle breed under both farming systems to know the effect of these styles of management. Data were collected from 108 adult females and 108 males in SFS and 108 females and 36 males in TFS on physical characteristics (colour of the coat, horns, eyelashes, muzzle, hoof, switch) and morphometric measurements – i.e. heart girth, body length, height at withers, height at hipbone, face length, horn length, horn circumference, ear (length and width), neck length, dewlap length, chine length, loin length, rump (length and width), length below knee, hoof circumference, tail and switch length. Results showed that farming systems significantly affect most of the morphological characteristics of both sexes, particularly the morphometric measurements with tall and leggy conformation for TFS cows and bulls. This indicates an adaptation to long distance transhumance and mountain terrain grazing. It can be concluded that the Achai has the potential to adapt to the requirements of specific farming systems. There is hence a need for the conservation of its adaptive traits in both farming systems.

Resumen

Pese a ser una raza bovina muy bien adaptada a las condiciones montañosas del macizo Hindu Kush en el norte de Pakistán, el ganado Achai sigue siendo un gran desconocido a día de hoy. La raza Achai es criada bajo un sistema ganadero estante (SGE) y un sistema ganadero trashumante (SGT). Este artículo compara las características morfológicas (físicas y morfométricas) de esta raza bovina bajo ambos sistemas ganaderos para conocer el efecto de estos tipos de manejo. Los datos fueron recogidos en 108 hembras adultas y 108 machos del SGE y en 108 hembras y 36 machos del SGT. Se tomaron datos de características físicas (color de la capa, de los cuernos, de las pestañas, del hocico, de las pezuñas y de la punta de la cola) y medidas morfométricas (perímetro torácico, longitud corporal, altura a la cruz, altura a la grupa, longitud de la cara, longitud y circunferencia de los cuernos, longitud y anchura de las orejas, longitud del cuello, longitud de la papada, longitud del tronco, longitud de los lomos, longitud y anchura de la grupa, longitud bajo las rodillas, circunferencia de las pezuñas, longitud de la cola y del mechón de pelo final). Los resultados mostraron que el sistema ganadero afecta significativamente a la mayoría de las características morfológicas de ambos sexos, en especial a las medidas morfométricas. Así, vacas y toros del SGT son animales altos con patas largas. Esta conformación refleja una adaptación a trashumancias de larga distancia y a un pastoreo en terrenos montañosos. Se puede concluir que el ganado Achai tiene potencial de adaptación a las necesidades de sistemas ganaderos específicos. Existe por tanto la necesidad de conservar los rasgos adaptativos de ambos sistemas de explotación.

Résumé

Bien qu'elle soit une race bovine bien adaptée aux conditions montagneuses de la chaîne Hindu Kush du nord du Pakistan, la race Achai demeure encore de nos jours assez inconnue. Ces animaux sont élevés selon un système d'élevage sédentaire (SES) et un système d'élevage transhumant (SET). Cet article compare les caractéristiques morphologiques (physiques et morphométriques) de cette race bovine élevée selon les deux systèmes d'exploitation pour connaître l'effet de ces pratiques d'élevage. Les données ont été prélevées sur 108 femelles adultes et 108 mâles en SES et 108 femelles et 36 mâles en SET. Les suivantes caractéristiques physiques ont été évaluées: couleur de la robe, des cornes, des cils, du museau, des sabots et de la mèche de la queue, et les suivantes mesures morphométriques ont été prises: périmètre thoracique, longueur du corps, hauteur au garrot, hauteur à la croupe, longueur de la tête, longueur et circonférence des cornes, longueur et largeur des oreilles, longueur du cou, longueur du fanon, longueur du tronc, longueur de l'échine, longueur et largeur de la croupe, longueur sous le genou, circonférence des sabots, longueur de la queue et de la mèche finale. Les résultats ont montré que les systèmes d'élevage affectent de façon significative la plupart des caractéristiques morphologiques aussi bien des mâles que des femelles, l'effet étant particulièrement significatif pour les mesures morphométriques. Ainsi, il a été noté que les vaches et les taureaux du SET sont de grands animaux à longues pattes. Ceci reflète une adaptation à des transhumances sur de longues distances et au pâturage en terrain montagneux. Il peut être conclu que les bovins Achai ont du potentiel pour s'adapter aux besoins de systèmes d'élevage spécifiques. La conservation de ses traits adaptatifs s'avère donc nécessaire dans les deux systèmes d'élevage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Amin, M., Nahar, A., Bhuiyan, A.K.F.H. & Faruque, M.O. 2007. On-farm characterization and present status of North Bengal Grey (NBG) cattle in Bangladesh. Anim. Genet. Resourc. Inf., 40: 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. District Census Report of District Lower Dir. Census Publication No. 31. Islamabad, Population Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2006. Livestock Census, NWFP. Lahore, Pakistan, Agricultural Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan, Gurumangat Road, Gulberg-III.Google Scholar
Berthouly, C., Maillard, J.C., Phan, D.L., Nhu, V.T., Bed'Hom, B., Leroy, G., Hoang, T.H., Laloe, D., Bruneau, N., Vu, C.C., Nguyen, D.V., Verrier, E. & Rognon, X. 2010. Revealing fine scale subpopulation structure in the Vietnamese H'mong cattle breed for conservation purposes. Biomed. Central Genet. 11: 45. (available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/11/45).Google ScholarPubMed
Desta, T.T., Ayalew, W. & Hedge, B.P. 2011. Breed and trait preferences of Sheko cattle keepers in southern Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43: 851856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO. 1986. Animal Genetic Resources Data Banks. 2. Descriptor Lists for Cattle, Buffalo, Pigs, Sheep and Goats. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 59/2. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (available at: www.fao.org/docrep/009/ah760e/ah760e00.htm Google Scholar
Hall, S.J.G. 1998. Traditional livestock in semi-arid North Eastern Zimbabwe: Mashona cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 30: 351360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamayun, M., Afzal, S. & Khan, M.A. 2006. Ethnopharmacology, indigenous collection and preservation techniques of some frequently used medicinal plants of Utror and Gabral, district Swat, Pakistan. Afr. J. Trad. Complem. Alter. Med. 3: 5773.Google Scholar
Hussain, S.S., Mudassar, M., Sheikh, M.M. & Manzoor, N. 2005. Climate change and variability in mountain regions of Pakistan: implications for water and agriculture. Pak. J. Met. 2: 7590.Google Scholar
Jing, L., Ren-jun, Z., Guo-rong, Z., Quing-ran, Y. & Hua-ming, M. 2010. Quantitative and qualitative body traits of Longling Yellow goats in China. Agric. Sci. China 9: 408415.Google Scholar
Joshi, N.R. & Phillips, R.W. 1953. Zebu cattle of India and Pakistan. FAO-Agricultural Studies No. 19. Rome, Italy, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Kenyanjui, M.B. & Sheikh-Ali, M. 2009. Observations on cattle dairy breeds in Pakistan; need to curb unseen economic losses through control of mastitis and endemic diseases. J. Agric. Environ. International Dev. 103: 155172.Google Scholar
Khan, B.B., Younas, M. & Hanjra, S.H. 1982. Breeds and Types of Livestock in Pakistan. Faisalabad, Department of Livestock Management, University of Agriculture, pp. 613.Google Scholar
Khan, M.S., Rehman, Z., Khan, M.A. & Ahmad, S. 2008. Genetic resources and diversity in Pakistani cattle. Pak. Vet. J. 28: 95102.Google Scholar
Kugonza, D.R., Nabasirye, M., Mpairwe, D., Hanotte, O. & Okeyo, A.M. 2011. Productivity and morphology of Ankole cattle in three livestock production systems in Uganda. Anim. Genet. Resour. 48: 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugonza, D.R., Nabasirye, M., Hanotte, O., Mpairwe, D. & Okeyo, A.M. 2012. Pastoralists' indigenous selection criteria and other breeding practices of the long-horned Ankole cattle in Uganda. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 44: 557565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mwacharo, J.M., Okeyo, A.M., Kamande, G.K. & Rege, J.E.O. 2006. The small East African shorthorn zebu cows in Kenya. 1: linear body measurements. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 38: 6574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouma, E., Abdulai, A., Drucker, A. & Obare, G. 2004. Assessment of farmer preferences for cattle traits in smallholder cattle production systems of Kenya and Ethiopia. Paper presented at Deutscher Tropentag Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, October 5–7, Berlin, Germany (available at www.tropentag.de/2004/abstracts/links/Drucker_UC2BrqI5.pdf).Google Scholar
Pilling, D., Boerma, D., Scherf, B. & Hoffmann, I. 2008. Sustaining livestock biodiversity –from assessment to action. Biodiversity 9: 1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saleem, M., Rahim, I., Rueff, H., Khan, M., Maselli, D., Weismann, U. & Muhammad, S. 2012. Effect of management on reproductive performances of the Achai cattle in theHindu Kush (Northern Pakistan). Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 44: 12971302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, K., Mohanty, R.T., Choi, T. & Hwang, I. 2007. Biology of epidermal and hair pigmentation in cattle: a mini review. Vet. Dermat. 18: 392400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, S.I.A. 1953. Breeds of Punjab. Animal Husbandry Department Punjab bulletin No. 5. Lahore, Government Printing Punjab.Google Scholar
Wahid, A. 1975. Livestock Resources of Pakistan: Bhagnari Cattle. Monograph-2, University of Karrachi, Karachi-32, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Wurzinger, M., Ndumu, D., Banumung, R., Drucker, A., Okeyo, A.M., Semambo, D.K., Byamungu, N. & Solkner, J. 2006. Comparison of production system and selection criteria of Ankole cattle by breeders in Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 38: 571581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yakubu, A., Idahor, K.O., Haruna, H.S., Wheto, M. & Amusan, S. 2010. Multivariate analysis of phenotypic differentiation in Bunaji and Sokoto Gudali cattle. Acta. Agric. Solvenica 96: 7580.Google Scholar