Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:11:49.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of body components of indigenous Saudi sheep breeds related to relative mature size and growth rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. S. E. Gaili
Affiliation:
College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, King Faisal University, PO Box 1757, Al-Ahsa 3198 2, Saudi Arabia
Get access

Abstract

Six male lambs from each of Najdi, Azvassi and Hejazi breeds of sheep were given the same diet and serially slaughtered at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of age. Slaughter and growth data including estimates of body maturity were collected. Allometeric growth coefficients were obtained for body components and breed differences in the proportions of the components at the same degree of body maturity or groivth rate were computed.

The live weight of lambs slaughtered at 6, 9 and 12 months of age differed between the breeds. Awassi lambs were less mature than Najdi or Hejazi lambs at slaughter. Hejazi lambs grew (relative to their mature size) faster than lambs of the other two breeds. The allometric regression coefficients of body components were similar1 in the breeds except those of the head, skin and genital organs.

Body composition of the breeds was reasonably similar at the same degree of body maturity or growth rate except skin and feet proportions were higher in Awassi and Najdi lambs, respectively, than in the other two breeds. Thus the three breeds conform to the scaling rules relating growth characteristics to mature size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1972. A review of research on animal an d forage production in Saudi Arabia. University College of North Wales and Ministry of Agriculture and Water Joint Agricultural Research and Development Project, publication no. 1.Google Scholar
Asker, A. A., El-Khalsy, I. G. and Juma, K. H. 1964. Effect of docking on growth and development of Awassi lambs. Journal of Animal Production (UAR) 4:1126.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Zamora, J., Thompson, J. M., Reddacliff, K. J. and Griffiths, D. A. 1984. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 1. Carcass muscle, fat and bone and body organs. Animal Production 39: 251258.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. 1971. The origins of domestic animals of Africa, vol. III, pp. 160168. American Publishing Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. 1985. The Awassi sheep with special reference to improved dairy type, pp. 190191. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 1987. Year book of production. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Ghanem, Y. S. E. 1980. [Arab sheep breeds], pp. 7597. Arab Organization for Education and Science and Arab Organization for the Study of Arid Zones. Tagadem Press, Cairo.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and development of mutton quantities in sheep. 2nd ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Kassem, R., Owen, J. B. and Fadel, I. 1989. The effect of pre-mating nutrition and exposure to the presence of rams on the onset of puberty in Awassi ewe lambs under semiarid conditions. Animal Production 48: 393397.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1967. Sheep breeds of the Mediterranean. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23: 281293.Google Scholar
Pálsson, H. 1955. Conformation and body composition. In Progress in the physiology of farm animals (ed. Hammond, J.), vol. 2, pp. 430542. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS users' guide, statistics. Version 5 ed. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and McClelland, T. H. 1987. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 2. Body components at slaughter. Animal Production 45: 261276.Google Scholar