Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:25:37.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calf Site Selection by Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus) from Three Contrasting Habitats in Northwest England: Implications for Welfare and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

T Birtles ,
C R Goldspink ,
S Gibson  and
R K Holland
T Birtles
Affiliation:
Tatton Park, Knutsford, Cheshire WA16 6QN, UK
C R Goldspink*
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M15 GD, UK
S Gibson
Affiliation:
Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough PE1 1JY, UK
R K Holland
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M15 GD, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study (1978-93) was concerned with calf site selection by red deer from three contrasting areas (two deer parks and one deer farm) of north-west England. It arose from initial (1960s-70s) concern over poor recruitment and the high incidence of ‘abandoned’ calves (at one site), and increasing levels of public disturbance in Lyme Park and Tatton Park. A better understanding of calving behaviour could lead to improved management procedures during calving. Habitat selection by adult females was examined indirectly, by recording where calves (0-2 days old) were born in relation to their weight. The deer farm provided a control site, where the effects of their social traditions could be minimized.

Calves were born over a wide area of moorland in Lyme Park but confined to a deer sanctuary in Tatton Park. Areas of obvious plant cover were selected in preference to open ground in Tatton Park and in the deer farm. No marked preferences were apparent in Lyme Park, although some areas were used more frequently than others, over all years. Most calves occurred within female home ranges. In Tatton Park, the heaviest calves were found in the preferred calving sites.

Calf weights varied widely within and between study sites. On average, the smallest (lightest) calves were recorded in Lyme Park and the heaviest in the deer farm. Sex differences in calf weights occurred in Tatton Park, but not at the other two sites. In general, late-born calves were smaller than those born early in the season. Variations in birthweight were linked to differences in female growth and site conditions. In the absence of more detailed statistics, calf weights can provide a useful measure of population performance.

Collectively, these results suggest that red deer can adopt a range of calving behaviours (‘tactics’) depending on the nature of the habitat (presence or absence of cover), perceived predation ‘risks’ (levels of disturbance), established social traditions and, possibly, parental investment. Cover appeared to be a primary requirement for calving. In the absence of cover, other behaviours were adopted. In some cases, these behaviours were not in the best interests of the calf, asparent females rarely returned tofeed their calves during the day and often engaged in energetically costly diversionary activities. In deer farms, conflicts between hinds may be exaggerated by limited access to ground cover, similar social status and low variance in calf weights.

In view of thesefindings, there is a need to devise new ways of attracting captive deer to cover, perhaps by modifications to the habitat mosaic. Observations from Tafton Park show that deer readily use refuges (the sanctuary), when available, although it may be difficult to initiate new behaviours where long-established traditions occur (eg Lyme Park). Mortality amongst calves is unacceptable in deer parks, but further work under more controlled conditions, is required to establish the mechanisms of calf site selection. Effective methods of locating calves are desirable for management purposes.

Keywords

animal welfarecalving behaviourdeer farmsdeer parksred deer
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , November 1998 , pp. 427 - 443
Copyright
© 1998 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Arman, P 1974 A note on the parturition and maternal behaviour of captive red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 37: 87–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arman, P, Hamilton, W J and Sharman, GAM 1978 Observations on the calving of free ranging tame red deer (Cervus elaphus L.J. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54: 279–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, M W 1981 Environmental characteristics and functional significance of pronghorn fawn bedding sites in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergerud, A T, Ferguson, R and Butler, H E 1990 Spring migration and dispersion of woodland caribou at calving. Animal Behaviour 39: 360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkett, A 1994 Reproductive Behaviour and Mating Strategies of Fallow Deer in an Enclosed Deer Park. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, UKGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K L and Hamilton, W J 1980 Reproduction in farmed red deer, calf growth and mortality. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, A 1986 The value of the new-born calf in ethological studies. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 16: 91–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, D J and Goldspink, C R 1992 Management, Welfare and Conservation of Park Deer. Proceedings of the Second Deer Parks Symposium, Leicester. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: South Mimms, UKGoogle Scholar
Bullock, D J, Kerridge, F J and Hanlon, A and Arnold, R W 1993 Short-term responses of deer to recreational disturbance in two deer parks. Journal of Zoology 230: 327–332Google Scholar
Byers J A and Byers K Z 1983 Do pronghorn mothers reveal the locations of their hidden fawns? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13: 147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, L 1989 English Deer Parks, an Historical Background. In: Baxter-Brown, M and Goldspink, C R (eds) Management, Conservation and Interpretation of Park Deer pp 1–5. British Deer Society: Pangbourne, UKGoogle Scholar
Carl, G R and Robbins, C T 1988 The energetic cost of predator avoidance in neonatal ungulates: hiding versus following. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, T M, Lombardo, L, Goldizen, A W and Kelly, M 1995 Tail-flagging and other antipredator signals in white-tailed deer: new data and synthesis. Behavioural Ecology 6(4): 442–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H 1991 The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton University Press: Princeton, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H and Albon, S D 1989 Red Deer in the Highlands. Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Albon, S D and Guinness, F E 1982 Competition between female relatives in a matrilocal mammal. Nature 300: 178–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Albon, S D and Guinness, F E 1989 Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337: 260–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clutton-Brock, T H and Guinness, F E 1975 Behaviour of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) at calving time. Animal Behaviour 55: 287–300Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Guinness, F E and Albon, S D 1982 Red Deer: the Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Guinness, F E and Albon, S D 1983 The costs of reproduction to red deer (Cervus elaphus L.J hinds. Journal of Animal Ecology 52: 367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Iason, G R, Albon, S D and Guinness, F E 1982 Effects of lactation on feeding behaviour and habitat use in wild red deer hinds. Journal of Zoology 198: 227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Iason, G R and Guinness, F E 1987 Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female Red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology 211: 275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Major, M, Albon, S D and Guinness, F E 1987 Early development and population dynamics of red deer. I: Density dependent effects on juvenile survival. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerill, R A 1982 Functional Aspects of Mother-offspring Relationships in Red Deer. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Cowie, G M, Morre, G H, Fisher, M W and Taylor, M J 1985 Calving behaviour of farmed red deer. In: Reitson, N S, Wilson, P R (eds) Proceedings of Deer Course for Veterinarians pp 143-154. New Zealand Veterinary Association, Deer Branch: Ashburton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Darling, F F 1937 A Herd of Red Deer. Oxford University Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
de Nahlik, A J 1987 Wild Deer: Culling, Conservation and Management. Ashford Press: Southampton, UKGoogle Scholar
Dixon, K R and Chapman, J A 1980 Harmonic mean measure of animal activity. Ecology 61: 1040–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, R D 1976 The significance of breeding synchrony in the wildebeest. East African Wildlife Journal 14: 135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festa-Bianchet, M 1989 Individual differences, parasites, and the costs of reproduction for bighorn ewes (Ovis canadensis). Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 785–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, T J 1989 Suggestions for deer park managers from a deer farmer. In: Baxter-Brown, M and Goldspink, C R (eds) Management, Conservation and Interpretation of Park Deer pp 60–66. British Deer Society: Pangbourne, UKGoogle Scholar
Fouda, M M, Nicol, C J, Webster, A J F and Metwally, M A 1990 Maternal-infant relationships in captive sika deer (Cervus nippon). Small Ruminant Research 3: 199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L C, Freeman, S C and Romney, A K 1992 The implications of social structure for dominance hierarchies in red deer, Cervus elaphus L. Animal Behaviour 44: 239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, S D 1994 A Comparative Study on the Behaviour and Ecology of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) During the First Year of Life. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, UKGoogle Scholar
Goldspink, C R 1987 The growth, reproduction and mortality of an enclosed population of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in north-west England. Journal of Zoology 213: 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W C H and Rothstein, A 1993 Persistent influences of birth date on dominance, growth and reproductive success in bison. Journal of Zoology 230: 177–186Google Scholar
Guinness, F E, Clutton-Brock, T H and Albon, S D 1978 Factors affecting calf mortality in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 817–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinness, F E, Gibson, R M and Clutton-Brock, T H 1978 Calving times in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology 185: 105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinness, F E, Hall, M J and Cockerill, R A 1979 Mother-offspring association in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Rhum. Animal Behaviour 27: 536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W J and Blaxter, K L 1980 Reproduction in farmed red deer 1. Hind and stag fertility. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 261–273Google Scholar
Hirth, D H 1977 Social behaviour of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildlife Monographs 53: 1–55Google Scholar
Holland, R K 1995 Social Behaviour, Dispersion and Dispersal of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) During the First Two Years of Life. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, UKGoogle Scholar
Humphries, R E, Smith, R H and Sibly, R M 1989 Effects of human disturbance on the welfare of park fallow deer. Deer 7: 458–63Google Scholar
Jackson, S L, Hik, D S and Rockwell, R F 1988 The influence of nesting habitat on reproductive success of the lesser snow goose. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 1699–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallquist, L and Mossing, T 1982 Olfactory recognition between mother and calf in reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus L.). Applied Animal Ethology 8: 561–565Google Scholar
Kelly, R W and Drew, K R 1976 Shelter seeking and suckling behaviour of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) calf in a farmed situation. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojola, I 1989 Mother's dominance status and differential investment in reindeer calves. Animal Behaviour 38: 177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latusek, E P 1983 The Autecology of Molinia caerulea (L) Moench. with Particular Reference to Grazing. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Polytechnic, UKGoogle Scholar
Langbein, J and Putman, R J 1992 Behavioural responses of park red and fallow deer to disturbance and the effects on population performance. Animal Welfare 1: 19–38Google Scholar
Laurenson, M K 1995 Behavioural costs and constraints of lactation in free-living cheetahs. Animal Behaviour 50: 815–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lent, P C 1974 Mother-infant relationships in ungulates. In: Geist, V and Walther, F (eds) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management pp 14–55. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Lickliter, R E 1984 Hiding behaviour in domestic goat kids. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 12: 187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, V P W 1969 Population dynamics of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Rhum. Journal of Animal Ecology 38: 425–456Google Scholar
McComb, K 1987 Roaring by red deer stags advances the date of oestrus in hinds. Nature 330: 648–649Google Scholar
Meikle, D B, Drickamer, L C, Vessey, S H, Rosenthal, T L and Fitzgerald, K S 1993 Maternal dominance rank and secondary sex ratio in domestic swine. Animal Behaviour 46: 79–85Google Scholar
Mitchell, B 1971 The weights of new-born one-day-old red deer calves in Scottish moorland habitats. Notes from the Mammal Society 164: 250–254Google Scholar
Mitchell, B and McCowan, D 1986 Performance and Population Dynamics in relation to Management of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) at Glenfeshie, Inverness-shire, Scotland. Biological Conservation 37: 237267Google Scholar
Mitchell, B, Staines, B W and Welch, D 1977 Ecology of Red Deer. A Research Review Relevant to their Management. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M E and Mech, D 1981 Deer social organization and wolf predation in northeastern Minnesota. Wildlife Monographs 77: 1–53Google Scholar
Pollard, J C, Littlejohn, R P and Suttie, J M 1992 Behaviour and weight change of red deer calves during different weaning procedures. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 35: 23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C, Littlejohn, R P and Suttie, J M 1993 Effects of isolation and mixing of social groups on heart rate and behaviour of red deer stags. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 38: 311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, R J 1988 The Natural History of Deer. Christopher Helm: Bromley, UKGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, P R 1984 Population dynamics of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Scottish commercial forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 82B: 303–319Google Scholar
Schwede, G, Hendrichs, H and McShea, W 1993 Social and spatial organization of female white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, during the fawning season. Animal Behaviour 45: 1007–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, D M and Haywood, J 1985 Early mother-young interactions in California bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis californiana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 868–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, A M, Fenn, P D, Kerr, W G, Loudon, ASI 1993 The influence of birth date on the development of seasonal cycles in red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology 230: 593–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P S 1987 Maternal defense in Columbian white-tailed deer: when is it worth it ? The American Naturalist 130(2): 310–315Google Scholar
Sokal, R R and Rohlf, F J 1981 Biometry, 3rd edition. W H Freeman: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Suttie, J M 1983 Body size: dominance relationships in red deer stag calves. Animal Behaviour 31: 610–611Google Scholar
Thouless, C R and Guinness, F E 1986 Conflict between red deer hinds: the winner always wins. Animal Behaviour 34: 1166–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R 1985 Social Evolution. Benjamin-Cummings: Menlo Park, USAGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, G K 1964 The Deer of Great Britain and Ireland, an Account of their History, Status and Distribution. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Yahner, R H 1980 Barking in a primitive ungulate, Muntiacus reevesi: function and adaptiveness. The American Naturalist 116: 157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yerex, D and Spiers, I 1990 Modern Deer Farm Management. GP Books: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Youngson, R W 1970 Rearing red deer calves in captivity. Journal of Wildlife Management 34: 467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar