Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:16:57.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shooting in the dark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

PJ Baker*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
S Harris
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: P.J.Baker@bristol.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bateson, P and Bradshaw, EL 2000 The effects of wound site and blood collection method on biochemical measures obtained from wild, free-ranging red deer (Cervus elaphus) shot by rifle. Journal of Zoology 252: 285292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucknell, R 2001 Foxing with Lamp and Rifle. Foxearth Publishing: Springfield, Chelmsford, UKGoogle Scholar
Coupland, RM 2003 Culling of wild red deer. Veterinary Record 153: 248Google ScholarPubMed
Fox, NC, Blay, N, Greenwood, AG, Wise, D and Potapov, E 2005 Wounding rates in shooting foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Animal Welfare 14: 93102Google Scholar
Pye-Smith, C 1997 Fox-Hunting — Beyond the Propaganda. Wildlife Network: Oakham, Rutland, UKGoogle Scholar
Urquhart, KA and McKendrick, IJ 2003 Survey of permanent wound tracts in the carcasses of culled wild red deer in Scotland. Veterinary Record 152: 497501Google Scholar
Webbon, CC, Baker, PJ and Harris, S 2004 Faecal density counts for monitoring changes in red fox numbers in rural Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 768779Google Scholar
Zar, JH 1999 Biostatistical Analysis, 4th Edition. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar