Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:50:47.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United States Department of Agriculture: building bridges through innovative animal well-being initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

RD Reynnells*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, Plant and Animal Systems, 800 9th Street, SW, Room 3130 Waterfront Centre, Washington, DC 20250-2220, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Animal well-being issues are addressed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) through a variety of agencies and in various formats. Most farmers are good stewards of their animals and will raise them according to societal demands as supported by market choices. Management standards that are perceived to improve upon current practices are being demanded of farmers by buyers of animal products, including corporate restaurant chains and groceries. Professional organisations, USDA, and university representatives, help to address well-being issues and help to create and evaluate standards. The USDA provides leadership in several cooperative programs involving activists and industry, coordinates certification programs, and provides liaisons to multi-state university research committees. A USDA Animal Well-Being Work Group facilitates communications among agency personnel. The USDA developed the Animal Welfare Issues Compendium, a national animal well-being symposium, and cooperates with industry, activists and universities on projects. The USDA provides grant funds for projects that are encouraged to include a component on animal well-being. Special grant funds from Congress have resulted in educational and research projects that complement existing USDA national research and educational initiatives. Regulatory commitments by USDA include the enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act and the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Audin, J H 2001 Animal welfare forum: bovine welfare. journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association P19: 13691398.Google Scholar
CAST 1997 Well-being of Agricultural Animals. Task Force Report No. 130. The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST): Iowa, USA. Available to order at: http://www.cast-science.orgGoogle Scholar
CAST 1998 Foodborne Pathogens: Review of Recommendations. Special Publication No. 22. The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST): Iowa, USA. Available to order at: http://www.cast-science.orgGoogle Scholar
CAST 2002 Urban and Agricultural communities: Opportunities for Common Ground. Task Force Report No. 138. The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST): Iowa, USA. Available to order at: http://www.cast-science.orgGoogle Scholar
FASS 1988 Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. Federation of Animal Science Societies: Illinois, USA (Revised in 1999). Available to order at: http://www.fass.org.Google Scholar
Houpt, K A and Crowell-Davis, S 1997 Animal welfare issues: equine production and performance. In: Reynnells, R D and EastWood, B R (eds) Animal Welfare Issues Compendium pp 7583. United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service: Washington, DC, USA. Available at: http://www.nal.usda.gov/awicGoogle Scholar
Reynnells, R D 2003 Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Swine Housing and Well-Being’, Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES), United States Department of Agriculture (ed). United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library, Animal Welfare Information Centre: Beltsville, Maryland, USA. Available from the author (rreynnells@csrees.usda.gov) or from Ed Pajor, Department of Animal Sciences, 1026 Poultry Building, Room 207, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Illinois 47907-1026, USA; pajor@purdue.eduGoogle Scholar