Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:22:18.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expression and detection of estrus in dairy cows: the role of new technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

P. M. Fricke ,
P. D. Carvalho ,
J. O. Giordano ,
A. Valenza ,
G. Lopes Jr  and
M. C. Amundson
P. M. Fricke*
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1205, USA
P. D. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1205, USA
J. O. Giordano
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1205, USA
A. Valenza
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1205, USA
G. Lopes Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1205, USA
M. C. Amundson
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1205, USA
*
†E-mail: pmfricke@wisc.edu
Get access

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of hormonal synchronization protocols that allow for timed artificial insemination (AI), detection of estrus plays an important role in the reproductive management program on most dairies in the United States. Increased physical activity is a secondary sign of estrus in dairy cattle, and a new generation of electronic systems that continuously monitor physical activity to predict timing of AI have been developed and marketed to the dairy industry. A variety of management and physiologic challenges inhibit detection of behavioral estrus on farms, but the prevalence of anouvular cows near the end of the voluntary waiting period is particularly problematic. Only 70% of lactating Holstein cows were detected in estrus when using an activity monitoring system, with the remaining 20% of cows classified as anovular and 10% ovulating without showing signs of activity. Mean time of AI in relation to ovulation based on the activity monitoring system was acceptable for most of the cows with increased activity, however, variability in the duration of estrus and timing of AI in relation to ovulation could result in poor pregnancy outcomes in some cows. Use of a Presynch–Ovsynch protocol for submission of cows for first AI has been widely adopted by dairies in the United States, and a combined approach in which AI based on activity is followed by submission of cows not detected with activity to timed AI after synchronization of ovulation may be an effective strategy for submission of cows to first AI. Based on a field trial on a large commercial dairy in the United States, the activity monitoring system detected 70% of cows with increased activity after the second PGF2α injection of a Presynch–Ovsynch protocol, however, cows inseminated to increased activity had fewer pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with cows with increased activity after the second PGF2α injection that received timed AI after completing the Presynch–Ovsynch protocol. Based on an economic model comparing reproductive management programs with varying levels of AI to estrus v. timed AI, the rate of estrus detection and the P/AI to inseminations based on AI to detected estrus v. timed AI affected the decision to inseminate based on activity v. timed AI. In conclusion, an activity monitoring system detected increased activity in about 70% of lactating Holstein cows on a large commercial dairy in the United States, however, synchronization of ovulation and timed AI was beneficial to inseminate cows not detected with increased activity by the activity monitoring system.

Keywords

dairy cowsestrus detectionactivity monitoring systemtimed AI
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Supplement s1: New Science ‐ New Practices International Cow Fertility Conference 18‐21 May 2014, Westport, Ireland , May 2014 , pp. 134 - 143
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alrich, RD 1994. Endocrine and neural control of estrus in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2738–2744.Google Scholar
Aungier, SPM, Roche, JF, Sheehy, M and Crowe, MA 2012. Effects of management and health on the use of activity monitoring for estrus detection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 2452–2466.Google Scholar
Bamber, RL, Shook, GE, Wiltbank, MC, Santos, JEP and Fricke, PM 2009. Genetic parameters for anovulation and pregnancy loss in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5739–5753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britt, JH, Scott, RG, Armstrong, JD and Wiitacre, MD 1986. Determinants of estrous behavior in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 2195–2202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caraviello, DZ, Weigel, KA, Fricke, PM, Wiltbank, MC, Florent, MJ, Cook, NB, Nordlund, KV, Zwald, NR and Rawson, CL 2006. Survey of management practices on reproductive performance of dairy cattle on large US commercial farms. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4723–4735.Google Scholar
Chebel, RC and Santos, JEP 2010. Effect of inseminating cows in estrus following a presynchronization protocol on reproductive and lactation performances. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 4632–4643.Google Scholar
Dransfield, MB, Nebel, RL, Pearson, RE and Warnick, LD 1998. Timing of insemination for dairy cows identified in estrus by a radiotelemetric estrus detection system. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1874–1882.Google Scholar
Firk, R, Stamer, E, Junge, W and Krieter, J 2002. Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science 75, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, PM, Valenza, A, Giordano, JO, Amundson, MC and Lopes, G Jr 2014. Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows managed for first service using timed artificial insemination with or without detection of estrus using an accelerometer system. Journal of Dairy Science 97 (In press).Google Scholar
Giordano, JO, Kalantari, AS, Fricke, PM, Wiltbank, MC and Cabrera, VE 2012. A daily herd Markov-chain model to study the reproductive and economic impact of reproductive programs combining timed artificial insemination and estrous detection. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 5442–5460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gümen, A, Guenther, JN and Wiltbank, MC 2003. Follicular size and response to ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3184–3194.Google Scholar
Gwazdauskas, FC, Nebel, RL, Sprecher, DJ, Whittier, WD and McGilliard, ML 1990. Effectiveness of rump-mounted devices and androgenized females for detection of estrus in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 2965–2970.Google Scholar
Holman, A, Thompson, J, Routly, JE, Cameron, J, Jones, DN, Grove-White, D, Smith, RF and Dobson, H 2011. Comparison of oestrus detection methods in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Record 169, 47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF 2003. The process of ovulation and sheedding of an oocyte. In Physiology of the graafian follicle and ovulation, pp. 262–286. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Hunter, RHF and Wilmut, I 1983. The rate of functional sperm transport into the oviducts of mated cows. Animal Reproduction Science 5, 167–173.Google Scholar
Hurnick, JF, King, GJ and Robertson, HA 1975. Estrous and related behavior in postpartum Holstein cows. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, R, Blanke, M, Poulsen, NK, Caponetti, F and Højsgaard, S 2011. Oestrus detection in dairy cows from activity and lying data using on-line individual models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 76, 6–15.Google Scholar
Kamphuis, C, DelaRue, B, Burke, CR and Jago, J 2012. Field evaluation of 2 collar-mounted activity meters for detecting cows in estrus on a large pasture-grazed dairy farm. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 3045–3056.Google Scholar
López-Gatius, F, López-Béjar, M, Fenech, M and Hunter, RHF 2005. Ovulation failure and double ovulation in dairy cattle: risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 63, 1298–1307.Google Scholar
Lopez, H, Satter, LD and Wiltbank, MC 2004. Relationship between level of milk production and estrous behavior of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 81, 209–223.Google Scholar
Lopez, H, Caraviello, DZ, Satter, LD, Fricke, PM and Wiltbank, MC 2005. Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2783–2793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Løvendahl, P and Chagunda, MGG 2010. On the use of physical activity monitoring for estrus detection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 249–259.Google Scholar
Miller, RH, Norman, HD, Kuhn, MT, Clay, JS and Hutchison, JL 2007. Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding in dairy herd improvement herds. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1594–1606.Google Scholar
Moreira, F, Orlandi, C, Risco, CA, Mattos, R, Lopes, F and Thatcher, WW 2001. Effects of presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1646–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navanukraw, C, Reynolds, LP, Kirsch, JD, Grazul-Bilska, AT, Redmer, DA and Fricke, PM 2004. A modified presynchronization protocol improves fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1551–1557.Google Scholar
Nebel, RL, Dransfield, MG, Jobst, SM and Bame, JH 2000. Automated electronic systems for the detection of oestrus and timing of AI in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 713–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nebel, RL, Walker, WL, McGilliard, ML, Allen, CH and Heckman, GS 1994. Timing of artificial insemination of dairy cows: fixed time once daily versus morning and afternoon. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 3185–3191.Google Scholar
Palmer, MA, Olmos, G, Boyle, LA and Mee, JF 2010. Estrus detection and estrus characteristics in housed and pastured Holstein-Friesian cows. Theriogenology 74, 255–264.Google Scholar
Peralta, OA, Pearson, RE and Nebel, RL 2005. Comparison of three estrus detection systems during summer in a large commercial dairy herd. Animal Reproduction Science 87, 59–72.Google Scholar
Pursley, JR, Mee, MO and Wiltbank, MC 1995. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH. Theriogenology 44, 915–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pursley, JR, Kosorok, MR and Wiltbank, MC 1997. Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranasinghe, RM, Nakao, T, Yamada, K and Koike, K 2010. Silent ovulation, based on walking activity and milk progesterone concentrations, in Holstein cows housed in a free-stall barn. Theriogenology 73, 942–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, JB, van Eerdenburg, FJ, Soede, NM and Kemp, B 2005. Pedometer readings for estrous detection and as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 64, 1690–1703.Google Scholar
Roelofs, JB, Graat, EA, Mullaart, E, Soede, NM, Voskamp-Harkema, W and Kemp, B 2006. Effects of insemination-ovulation interval on fertilization rates and embryo characteristics in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 66, 2173–2181.Google Scholar
Roelofs, JB, Bouwman, EG, Dieleman, SJ, Van Eerdenburg, FJ, Kaal-Lansbergen, LM, Soede, NM and Kemp, B 2004. Influence of repeated rectal ultrasound examinations on hormone profiles and behaviour around oestrus and ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 62, 1337–1352.Google Scholar
Rorie, RW, Bilby, TR and Lester, TD 2002. Application of electorinc estrus detection technologies to reproductive management of cattle. Theriogenology 57, 137–148.Google Scholar
Santos, JEP, Thatcher, WW, Chebel, RC, Cerri, RLA and Galvão, KN 2004. The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83, 513–535.Google Scholar
Senger, PL 1994. The estrus detection problem: new concepts, technologies, and possibilities. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2745–2753.Google Scholar
Sterry, RA, Welle, ML and Fricke, PM 2006. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone after first timed AI improves fertility in noncycling lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4237–4245.Google Scholar
Stevenson, JS and Call, EP 1983. Influence of early estrus, ovulation, and insemination on fertility in postpartum Holstein cows. Theriogenology 19, 367–375.Google Scholar
Stevenson, JS and Phatak, AP 2005. Inseminations at estrus induced by presynchronization before application of synchronized estrus and ovulation. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 399–405.Google Scholar
Stevenson, JS, Tenhouse, DE, Krisher, RL, Lamb, GC, Dahlen, CR, Pursley, JR, Bello, NM, Fricke, PM, Wiltbank, MC, Brusveen, DJ, Burkhart, M, Youngquist, RS and Garverick, HA 2008. Detection of anovulation by heatmount detectors and transrectal ultrasonography before treatment with progesterone in a timed insemination protocol. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2901–2915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sveberg, G, Refsdal, AO, Erhard, HW, Kommisrud, E, Aldrin, M, Tvete, IF, Buckley, F, Waldmann, A and Ropstad, E 2011. Behavior of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows during spontaneous cycles of estrus. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1289–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenza, A, Giordano, JO, Lopes, G Jr, Vincenti, L, Amundson, MC and Fricke, PM 2012. Assessment of an accelerometer system for detection of estrus and for treatment with GnRH at the time of insemination in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 7115–7127.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, JLM, Silcox, RW, Rosa, GJM, Pursley, JR and Wiltbank, MC 1999. Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 52, 1067–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, WL, Nebel, RL and McGilliard, ML 1996. Time of ovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1555–1561.Google Scholar
Wilmut, I and Hunter, RHF 1984. Sperm transport into the oviducts of heifers mated early in oestrus. Reproduction Nutrition and Development 24, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiltbank, MC, Gümen, A and Sartori, R 2002. Physiological classification of anovularoty conditions in cattle. Theriogenology 57, 21–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiltbank, M, Lopez, H, Sartori, R, Sangsritavong, S and Gümen, A 2006. Changes in reproductive physiology of lactating dairy cows due to elevated steroid metabolism. Theriogenology 65, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, ZZ, McKnight, DJ, Vishwanath, R, Pitt, CJ and Burton, LJ 1998. Estrus detection using radiotelemetry or visual observation and tail painting for dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2890–2896.Google Scholar