Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:05:22.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The roles of livestock in developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

M. Herrero ,
D. Grace ,
J. Njuki ,
N. Johnson ,
D. Enahoro ,
S. Silvestri  and
M. C. Rufino
M. Herrero*
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
D. Grace
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
J. Njuki
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
N. Johnson
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
D. Enahoro
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
S. Silvestri
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
M. C. Rufino
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
*
†E-mail: m.herrero@cgiar.org
Get access

Abstract

Livestock play a significant role in rural livelihoods and the economies of developing countries. They are providers of income and employment for producers and others working in, sometimes complex, value chains. They are a crucial asset and safety net for the poor, especially for women and pastoralist groups, and they provide an important source of nourishment for billions of rural and urban households. These socio-economic roles and others are increasing in importance as the sector grows because of increasing human populations, incomes and urbanisation rates. To provide these benefits, the sector uses a significant amount of land, water, biomass and other resources and emits a considerable quantity of greenhouse gases. There is concern on how to manage the sector's growth, so that these benefits can be attained at a lower environmental cost. Livestock and environment interactions in developing countries can be both positive and negative. On the one hand, manures from ruminant systems can be a valuable source of nutrients for smallholder crops, whereas in more industrial systems, or where there are large concentrations of animals, they can pollute water sources. On the other hand, ruminant systems in developing countries can be considered relatively resource-use inefficient. Because of the high yield gaps in most of these production systems, increasing the efficiency of the livestock sector through sustainable intensification practices presents a real opportunity where research and development can contribute to provide more sustainable solutions. In order to achieve this, it is necessary that production systems become market-orientated, better regulated in cases, and socially acceptable so that the right mix of incentives exists for the systems to intensify. Managing the required intensification and the shifts to new value chains is also essential to avoid a potential increase in zoonotic, food-borne and other diseases. New diversification options and improved safety nets will also be essential when intensification is not the primary avenue for developing the livestock sector. These processes will need to be supported by agile and effective public and private institutions.

Keywords

livestockdeveloping worldenvironmentpoverty reductionfood securitylivelihoods
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue s1: The 8th International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores (ISNH8) 6 – 9th September 2011, Aberystwyth (UK) , March 2013 , pp. 3 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, LH 2002. Iron supplements: scientific issues concerning efficacy and implications for research and programs. Journal of Nutrition 132, 813S–819S.Google Scholar
Aklilu, HA, Almekinders, CJM, Udo, HMJ, Van der Zijpp, AJ 2008. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39, 165–177.Google Scholar
Ayoade, JA, Ibrahim, HI, Ibrahim, HY 2009. Analysis of women involvement in livestock production in Lafia area of Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development 21, article #220.Google Scholar
Baggs, EM, Chebii, J, Ndufa, J 2006. A short-term investigation of trace gas emissions following tillage and no-tillage of agroforestry residues in western Kenya. Soil and Tillage Research 90, 69–76.Google Scholar
Barrett, CB, Reardon, T, Webb, P 2001. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 26, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernues, A, Herrero, M 2008. Farm intensification and drivers of technology adoption in mixed crop-dairy systems in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R, Allen, L, Bhutta, Z, Caufield, L, de Onis, M, Ezzati, M, Mathers, C, Rivera, J 2008. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. The Lancet 371, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, R, Cousens, S, Johnson, H, Lawn, J, Ruden, I, Bassani, D, Jha, P, Campbell, H, Walker, C, Cibulsklis, R, Eisele, T, Liu, L, Mathers, C 2010. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 375, 1969–1987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouwman, AF, Klein Goldewijk, K, Van der Hoek, KW, Beusen, AHW, Van Vuuren, DP, Willems, J, Rufino, MC, Stehfest, E 2011. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production for the period 1900-2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, doi/10.1073/pnas.1012878108.Google Scholar
Bravo-Baumann, H 2000. Gender and livestock: capitalisation of experiences on livestock projects and gender. Working Document. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Bern. http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/LEAD/X6106E/x6106e00.HTMGoogle Scholar
Bruinsma, J 2003. World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 – an FAO perspective. Earthscan Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
Budaka, DB, Darca, N, Kantar, M 2005. Women farmers and extension services in small ruminant production in mountain areas of Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments 62, 507–515.Google Scholar
Burnsilver, S 2009. Pathways of continuity and change: Maasai livelihoods in Amboseli, Kajiado district, Kenya. In Staying Maasai: livelihoods, conservation and Human Development in East African Rangelands (ed. K Homewood, P Trench, P Kristjanson, M Radeny), pp. 161–207. Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, Springer Press, Germany.Google Scholar
Canet, C, N'Diaye, C 1996. L'alimentation de rue en Afrique. Alimentation, nutrition et agriculture 17/18:4-13. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Carter, MR, Barrett, CB 2006. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: an asset-based approach. Journal of Development Studies 42, 179–199.Google Scholar
Centner, TJ 2011. Addressing water contamination from concentrated animal feeding operations. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikowo, R, Mapfumo, P, Nyamugafata, P, Giller, KE 2004. Mineral N dynamics, leaching and nitrous oxide losses under maize following two-year improved fallows on a sandy loam soil in Zimbabwe. Plant and Soil 259, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivenge, P, Vanlauwe, B, Six, J 2011. Does the combined application of organic and mineral nutrient sources influence maize productivity? A meta-analysis. Plant Soil, doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0626-5.Google Scholar
Conant, RT, Paustian, K 2002. Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16, 1143–1152.Google Scholar
Coppock, D L, Desta, S, Wako, A, Aden, I, Gebru, G, Tezera, S, Tadecha, C 2006. Collective action by women's groups to combat drought and poverty in northern Kenya. Pastoral Risk Management Project Research Brief 06-01. Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program, University of California – Davis, Davis, CA, USA. www.glcrsp.ucdavis.edu).Google Scholar
Cuellar, AD, Webber, ME 2008. Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. Environmental Research Letters 3, 034002 (8pp).Google Scholar
Davis, B, Winters, P, Carletto, G, Covarrubias, K, Quinones, E, Zezza, A, Stamoulis, K, Bonomi, G, DiGiuseppe, S 2007. Rural income generating activities: a cross-country comparison. ESA Working Paper 07-16. FAO, Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, W, Folman, LB, Summerbell, RC, Boddy, L 2005. Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 29, 795–811.Google Scholar
Delgado, C, Rosegrant, M, Steinfeld, H, Ehui, S, Courbois, C 1999. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 28. IFPRI/FAO/ILRI, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Dercon, S, Krishnan, T 1996. Income portfolio in rural Ethiopia and Tanzania: choices and constraints. The Journal of Development Studies 32, 850–875.Google Scholar
Deshingkar, P, Farrington, J, Rao, L, Sharma, SAP, Freeman, A, Reddy, J 2008. Livestock and poverty reduction in India: findings from the ODI Livelihoods Options Project. Discussion Paper No. 8. Targeting and Innovation. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
East Africa Dairy Development (EADD) 2008. Gender, dairy production and marketing, East Africa Dairy Development Project. Baseline Report No. 6 (Flintan). EADD/ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Ellis, F, Freeman, HA 2004. Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction strategies in four African countries. The Journal of Development Studies 40, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO 2007. State of Food and Agriculture Report: paying farmers for environmental services. Food Agricultural Organisation, United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1200e/a1200e00.htmGoogle Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2009. The State of Food and Agriculture. Livestock in the balance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector. A life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy FAO 2009.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT 2011. FAOSTAT database. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Fielding, W, Gullick, C, Coutts, P, Sharp, B 2000. An introduction to the food economy research in Southern Sudan, 1994–2000. WFP and SC UK, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Flintan, F 2008. Women's Empowerment in Pastoral Societies. WISP, GEF, IUCN, UNDP.Google Scholar
Gerber, P, Chilonda, P, Franceschini, G, Menzi, H 2005. Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia. Bioresource Technology 96, 263–276.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J, Lapar, ML, Unger, F, Grace, D 2010. The most important zoonosis in the world. Paper presented at Ecohealth Conference, August 18–20, London.Google Scholar
Gourley, CJP, Aarons, SR, Powell, JM 2011. Nitrogen use efficiency and manure management practices in contrasting dairy production systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.011.Google Scholar
Grace, D 2007. Women's reliance on livestock in developing-country cities. ILRI Working Paper. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Grace, D, Randolph, T, Olawoye, J, Dipelou, M, Kang'ethe, E 2008. Participatory risk assessment: a new approach for safer food in vulnerable African communities. Development in Practice 18, 611–618.Google Scholar
Grace, D, Mutua, F, Ochungo, P, Kruska, R, Jones, K, Brierley, L, Lapar, L, Said, M, Herrero, M, Pham Duc, P, Nguyen, BT, Akuku, I, Ogutu, F 2012. Mapping of poverty and likely zoonoses hotspots: report to the Department for International Development. ILRI report International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Graffham, A, Zulu, R, Chibanda, D 2005. Improving the safety of street vended foods in Southern Africa. Final Report, CPHP Project R8272. In Engendering Agricultural Research. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00973. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M, Porras, I, Wunder, S 2005. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. IIED.Google Scholar
Guèye, EF 2000. The role of family poultry in poverty alleviation, food security and the promotion of gender equality in rural Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 29, 129–136.Google Scholar
Heffernan, C, Misturelli, F, Pilling, D 2003. Livestock and the poor: findings from Kenya, India and Bolivia. Animal Health Programme. Department for International Development, London.Google Scholar
Henderson, B, Gerber, P, Opyo, C 2011. Climate change and livestock, challenges and options. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 6, No. 16, 11p.Google Scholar
Herath, S 2007. Women in livestock development in Asia. Journal of Commonwealth Veterinary Association 24, 29–37.Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Thornton, PK, Gerber, P, Reid, RS 2009. Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1, 111–120.Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Thornton, PK, Havlík, P, Rufino, M 2011. Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: mitigation options and trade-offs. In Climate change mitigation and agriculture (ed. E Wollenberg, A Nihart, ML Tapio-Bistrom and C Seeberg-Elverfeldt) Earthscan, London, UK (in press).Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Thornton, PK, Notenbaert, AM, Wood, S, Msangi, S, Freeman, HA, Bossio, D, Dixon, J, Peters, M, van de Steeg, J, Lynam, J, Parthasarathy Rao, P, Macmillan, S, Gerard, B, McDermott, J, Seré, C, Rosegrant, M 2010. Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science 327, 822–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaitner, J, Sowe, J, Secka-Njie, E, Dempfle, L 2001. Ownership pattern and management practices of small ruminants in The Gambia – implications for a breeding programme. Small Ruminant Research 40, 101–108.Google Scholar
Jones, KE, Patel, N, Levy, MA, Storeygard, A, Balk, D, Gittleman, JL, Daszak, P 2008. Global trends in human emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451, 990–993.Google Scholar
Kaitibie, S, Omore, A, Rick, K, Salasya, B, Hooton, N, Mwero, D, Kristjanson, P 2008. Influence pathways and economic impacts of policy change in the Kenyan dairy sector, ILRI Research Report No. 15. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya, 40p.Google Scholar
Keusch, GT, Farthing, MJG 1986. Nutrition and infection. Annual Review of Nutrition 6, 131–154.Google Scholar
Knight, RL, Payne, VWE Jr, Borer, RE, Clarke, RA Jr, Pries, JH 2000. Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecological Engineering 15, 41–55.Google Scholar
Kristjanson, P, Krishna, A, Radeny, M, Kuan, J, Quilca, G, Sanchez-Urrelo, A 2005. Dynamic Poverty Processes and the Role of Livestock in Peru. FAO/Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kristjanson, P, Waters-Bayer, A, Johnson, N, Tipilda, A, Jemimah, N, Batenwreck, I, Grace, D, MacMillan, S 2010. Livestock and women's livelihoods: a review of the recent evidence. Discussion Paper 20. ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Kunz, A, Miele, M, Steinmetz, RLR 2009. Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil. Bioresource Technology 100, 5485–5489, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.10.039.Google Scholar
Landell-Mills, N, Porras, I 2002. Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. IIED, London.Google Scholar
Lannerstad, M, Heinke, J, Herrero, M, Havlik, P. Livestock production systems – green, green, blue consumptive water use. In Water and livestock: Interactions, trade-offs and opportunities symposium, World Water Week in Stockholm 2012, Water and food security, 26 August 2012. Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
León-Velarde, CU, Quiroz, R 2004. The development of livestock production systems in the Andean region: implications for smallholder producers. In Animal production and animal science worldwide: A Review on Developments and Research in Livestock Systems, World Association of Animal Production, Book of the Year 2003 (ed. A Rosati, A Tewolde, C Mosconi), pp. 233–240. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
LID (Livestock in Development) 2004 . Livestock services and the poor. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Research Unit. Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading.Google Scholar
Liu, J, You, L, Amini, M, Obersteiner, M, Herrero, M, Zehnder, AJB, Yang, H 2010. A high resolution assessment of nitrogen flows in cropland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 835–840.Google Scholar
Lynch, M, Painter, J, Woodruff, R, Braden, C 2006. Surveillance for foodborne-disease outbreaks – United States, 1998–2002. MMWR – Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Reports 55, 1–42.Google Scholar
Maudlin, I, Eisler, MC, Welburn, SC 2009. Neglected and endemic zoonoses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 2777–2787.Google Scholar
McDermott, JJ, Staal, S, Freeman, HA, Herrero, M, van de Steeg, J 2010. Sustaining intensification of smallholder systems in the tropics. Livestock Science 130, 95–109, doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMichael, AJ, Powles, JW, Butler, CD, Uauy, R 2007. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. The Lancet 370, 1253–1263.Google Scholar
McPeak, J, Doss, C 2006. Are household production decisions cooperative? Evidence on migration and milk sales from northern Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88, 525–541.Google Scholar
Mullins, GL, Wahome, P, Tsangari, A, Maarse, L 1996. Impacts of intensive dairy production on smallholder farm women in Coastal Kenya. Human Ecology 24, 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, SP, Allen, LH 2003. Nutritional importance of animal source foods. Journal of Nutrition 133, 3932S–3935S.Google Scholar
Narayan, D, Patel, R, Schafft, K, Rademacher, A, Koch-Schulte, S 2000. Voices of the Poor. Can Anyone Hear Us? Voices from 46 Countries. The World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R, Steinfeld, H, Falcon, W, Galloway, J, Smil, V, Bradford, E, Alder, J, Mooney, H 2005. Losing the links between livestock and land. Science 310, 1621–1622.Google Scholar
Neumann, CG, Bwibo, NO, Murphy, SP, Sigman, M, Whaley, S, Allen, LH, Guthrie, D, Weiss, RE, Demment, M 2003. Animal source foods improve dietary quality, micronutrient status, growth and cognitive function in Kenyan school children: background, study design and baseline findings. Journal of Nutrition 133, 3941S–3949S.Google Scholar
Niamir-Fuller, M 1994. Women livestock managers in the Third World: focus on technical issues related to gender roles in livestock production. Staff Working Paper 18. IFAD, Rome.Google Scholar
Njuki, JM 2001. Gender roles in agroforesty: a socio-economic analysis of Embu and Kirinyaga Districts, Kenya. PhD thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania.Google Scholar
Njuki, J, Kihiyo, M, O'ktingati, A, Place, F 2004. Male versus female labour in an agroforestry system in the Central Highlands of Kenya: correcting the misconception. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 3, 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nkedianye, D, Kristjanson, P, Radeny, M, Herrero, M 2009. Chapter 4. Assessing returns to land and changing livelihood strategies in Kitengela. In Staying Maasai: livelihoods, conservation and human development in East African Rangelands (ed. K Homewood, P Trench, P Kristjanson, M Radeny), pp. 115–139. Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, Springer Press, Germany.Google Scholar
Nori, M 2008. Milking drylands: gender networks, pastoral markets and food security in stateless Somalia. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL. <http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wda/lang/1929205>>Google Scholar
Oboler, RS 1996. Whose cows are they, anyway? Ideology and behaviour in Nandi cattle “ownership” and control. Human Ecology 24, 255–272.Google Scholar
Oenema, O 2006. Nitrogen budgets and losses in livestock systems. International Congress Series 1293, 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O, Oudendag, D, Velthof, GL 2007. Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livestock Science 112, 261–272.Google Scholar
Okali, C, Sumberg, JE 1985. Sheep and goats, men and women: household relations and small ruminant development in south-west Nigeria. Agricultural Systems 18, 39–59.Google Scholar
Okike, A, Grace, D, Hussni, M 2010. Assessment of risks to human health associated with meat in Nigeria. Integrated Animal & Human Health Management Project, Unpublished report.Google Scholar
O'Mara, FP 2011. The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166, 7–15.Google Scholar
Omore, A, Cheng'ole, MJ, Fakhrul, ISM, Nurah, G, Khan, MI, Staal, SJ, Dugdill, BT 2001. Employment generation through small-scale dairy marketing and processing: experiences from Kenya, Bangladesh and Ghana, ILRI (http:www.fao.org/ag/againfo/resources/en/pubs_aprod.html#1).Google Scholar
Omore, A, Arimi, S, Kangethe, E, McDermott, J, Staal, S, Ouma, E, Odhiambo, J, Mwangi, A, Aboge, G, Koroti, E, Koech, R 2001. Assessing and managing milk-borne health risks for the benefit of consumers in Kenya. SDP research report. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S, Arcenas, A, Platais, G 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America, World Development. Elsevier 33, 237–253.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S, Rios, AR, Arcenas, A 2008. Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua, Environment and Development Economics. Cambridge University Press 13, 299–325.Google Scholar
PBL 2010. The Protein Puzzle: the consumption and production of meat, dairy and fish in the European Union. Netherlands Environmental Agency, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Peden, D, Tadesse, G, Misra, AK, Awad Amed, F, Astatke, A, Ayalneh, W, Herrero, M, Kiwuwa, G, Kumsa, T, Mati, B, Mpairwe, D, Wassenaar, T, Yimegnuhal, A 2007. Chapter 13: Livestock and water for human development. In Water for food, water for life: comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture (ed. D Molden), pp. 485–514. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Pelletier, N, Tyedmers, P 2010. Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107, pp. 18371–18374.Google Scholar
Perry, B, Grace, D 2009. The impacts of livestock diseases and their control on growth and development processes that are pro-poor. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 2643–2655.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Sommer, SG, Béline, F, Burton, C, Dach, J, Dourmad, JY, Leip, A, Misselbrook, T, Nicholson, F, Poulsen, HD, Provolo, G, Sørensen, P, Vinnerås, B, Weiske, A, Bernal, MP, Böhm, R, Juhász, C, Mihelic, R 2007. Recycling of livestock manure in a whole-farm perspective. Livestock Science 112, 180–191.Google Scholar
Powell, JM, Gourley, CJP, Rotz, CA, Weaver, DM 2010. Nitrogen use efficiency: a measurable performance indicator for dairy farms. Environmental Science and Policy 13, 217–228.Google Scholar
Randolph, TF, Schelling, E, Grace, D, Nicholson, CF, Leroy, JL, Cole, DC, Demment, MW, Omore, A, Zinsstag, J, Ruel, M 2007. Role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2788–2800.Google Scholar
Rangnekar, S 1998. Women in livestock production in developing countries. International Conference on Sustainable Animal Production, 24–27 November, Hisar, India.Google Scholar
Reardon, T 1997. Using evidence of household income diversification to inform study of the rural nonfarm labor market in Africa. World Development 25, 735–748.Google Scholar
Reid, RS, Thornton, PK, McCrabb, GJ, Kruska, RL, Atieno, F, Jones, PG 2004. Is it possible to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in pastoral ecosystems of the tropics? Environment, Development and Sustainability 6, 91–109.Google Scholar
Rockström, J, Lannerstad, M, Falkenmark, M 2007. Assessing the water challenge of a new green revolution in developing countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 6253–6260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosegrant, MW, Fernandez, M, Sinha, A, Alder, J, Ahammad, H, de Fraiture, C, Eickhout, B, Fonseca, J, Huang, J, Koyama, O, Omezzine, AM, Pingali, P, Ramirez, R, Ringler, C, Robinson, S, Thornton, P, van Vuuren, D, Yana-Shapiro, H, Ebi, K, Kruska, R, Munjal, P, Narrod, C, Ray, S, Sulser, T, Tamagno, C, van Oorschot, M, Zhu, T 2009. Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST (Agricultural Knowledge Science and Technology). In Agriculture at a crossroads (ed. BD McIntyre, HR Herren, J Wakhungu, RT Watson), pp. 307–376. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rubin, D, Tezera, S, Caldwell, L 2010. A calf, a house, a business of one's own: Microcredit, asset accumulation, and economic empowerment in GL CRSP projects in Ethiopia and Ghana, Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Rowe, EC, Delve, RJ, Giller, KE 2006. Nitrogen cycling efficiencies through resource-poor African crop-livestock systems: a review. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 112, 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufino, MC, Tittonell, P, van Wijk, MT, Castellanos-Navarrete, A, Delve, RJ, de Ridder, N, Giller, KE 2007. Manure as a key resource within smallholder farming systems: analysing farm-scale nutrient cycling efficiencies with the NUANCES framework. Livestock Science 112, 273–287.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Dury, J, Tittonell, P, van Wijk, MT, Herrero, M, Zingore, S, Mapfumo, P, Giller, KE 2011. Competing use of organic resources, village-level interactions between farm types and climate variability in a communal area of NE Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 104, 175–190.Google Scholar
Salman, MD, Morley, PS, Ruch-Gallie, R (eds) 1999. International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Nairobi (Kenya). Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics. Paper 333, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Sanchez, PA 2002. Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295, 2019–2020.Google Scholar
Scharff, RL 2010. Health-related costs from foodborne illness in the United States. The Produce Safety Project at Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schlundt, J, Toyofuku, H, Jansen, J, Herbst, SA 2004. Emerging food-borne zoonoses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 23, 513–533.Google ScholarPubMed
Seré, C, Steinfeld, H 1996. World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 127, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Sherraden, M 1991. Assets and the poor: a new American welfare policy. ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
Silvestri, S, Osano, P, De Leeuw, J, Herrero, M, Ericksen, P, Kariuki, J, Njuki, J, Notenbaert, A, Bedelian, C 2012. Assessing the potential of payment for environmental services in livestock-inclusive agricultural production systems in developing countries. ILRI research report, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Singh, BB, Ajeigbe, HA, Tarawali, SA, Fernandez-Rivera, S, Musa, A 2003. Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Research 84, 169–177.Google Scholar
Smith, P, Gregory, PJ, van Vuuren, D, Obersteiner, M, Havlík, P, Rounsevell, M, Woods, J, Stehfest, E, Bellarby, J 2010. Competition for land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365, 2941–2957.Google Scholar
Smith, P, Martino, D, Cai, Z, Gwary, D, Janzen, H, Kumar, P, McCarl, B, Ogle, S, O'Mara, F, Rice, C, Scholes, B, Sirotenko, O 2007. Agriculture. In Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of 24 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, R Dave and RL Meyer), pp. 497–540. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Staal, S, Poole, J, Baltenweck, I, Mwacharo, J, Notenbaert, A, Randolph, T, Thorpe, W, Nzuma, J, Herrero, M 2009. Strategic investment in livestock development as a vehicle for rural livelihoods. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – ILRI Knowledge Generation Project Report. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 78pp.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M, de Haas, C 2006. Livestock's long shadow. Environmental issues and options. LEAD-FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 390pp.Google Scholar
Sumberg, J 2002. The logic of fodder legumes in Africa. Food Policy 27, 285–300.Google Scholar
Sutton, MA, Oenema, O, Erisman, JW, Leip, A, Van Grinsven, H, Winiwarter, W 2011. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161.Google Scholar
Tarawali, S, Herrero, M, Descheemaeker, K, Grings, E, Blümmel, M 2011. Pathways for sustainable development of mixed crop livestock systems: taking a livestock and pro-poor approach. Livestock Science 139, 11–21.Google Scholar
Teufel, N, Kuettner, K, Gall, C 1998. Contribution of goat husbandry to household income in the Punjab (Pakistan): a review. Small Ruminant Research 28, 101–107.Google Scholar
Thompson, DM, Serneels, S, Ole Kaelo, D, Chevenix Trench, P 2009. Maasail mara – land privatization and wildlife decline: can conservation pay its way? In Staying Maasai: livelihoods, conservation and Human Development in East African Rangelands. Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation (ed. K Homewood, P Trench, P Kristjanson, M Radeny), pp. 77–114. Springer Press, Germany.Google Scholar
Thorns, CJ 2000. Bacterial food-borne zoonoses. Revenue scientifique et technique Office international des epizooties 19, 226–239.Google Scholar
Thornton, PK 2010. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365, 2853–2867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, PK, Herrero, M 2010. The inter-linkages between rapid growth in livestock production, climate change, and the impacts on water resources, land use, and deforestation. Background paper for the 2010 World Development Report. Policy Research Working Paper 5178. The World Bank, Washington, US, 82pp.Google Scholar
Thornton, PK, Kruska, RL, Henninger, N, Kristjanson, PM, Reid, RS, Atieno, F, Odero, A, Ndegwa, T 2002. Mapping poverty and livestock in the developing world. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 124pp.Google Scholar
Toriola, AL, Goon, DT 2012. Overweight, obesity and underweight in rural black South African children. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition 25, 57–61.Google Scholar
Turpie, JK, Marais, C, Blignaut, JN 2008. The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics 65, 788–798.Google Scholar
Valdivia, C 2001. Gender, livestock assets, resource management, and food security: lessons from the SR-CRSP. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 27–39.Google Scholar
Vanlauwe, B, Giller, KE 2006. Popular myths around soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 116, 34–46.Google Scholar
Wangui, EE 2008. Development interventions, changing livelihoods, and the making of female Maasai pastoralists. Agriculture and Human Values 25, 365–378.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) 2008. The World Health Report 2008 – primary health care: now more than ever.Google Scholar
Wunder, S 2005. Payment for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional paper no. 42, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Yisehak, K 2008. Gender responsibility in smallholder mixed crop–livestock production systems of Jimma zone, South West Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20. Retrieved January 14, 2010, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/1/yise20011.htmGoogle Scholar