Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:23:43.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short communication: administering an appeasing substance to Bos indicus-influenced beef cattle at weaning and feedlot entry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2019

R. F. Cooke*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77845, USA
A. Millican
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77845, USA
A. P. Brandão
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77845, USA
T. F. Schumaher
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, UNESP Rua Prof, R. Dr. Valter Maurício Corrêa, s/n, Botucatu/SP 18168-681, Brazil
O. A. de Sousa
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, UNESP Rua Prof, R. Dr. Valter Maurício Corrêa, s/n, Botucatu/SP 18168-681, Brazil
T. Castro
Affiliation:
Nutricorp, Rodovia Wilson Finardi, Km 31, 5 Araras/SP 13601-000, Brazil
R. S. Farias
Affiliation:
AgroVentura Pecuária, Rodovia Castelo Branco Km 307, Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo/SP 18900-000, Brazil
B. I. Cappellozza
Affiliation:
Nutricorp, Rodovia Wilson Finardi, Km 31, 5 Araras/SP 13601-000, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

The bovine appeasing substance (BAS) is expected to have calming effects in cattle experiencing stressful situations. Therefore, this study investigated the impacts of BAS administration during two of the most stressful events within beef production systems: weaning and feedlot entry. In experiment 1, 186 Bos indicus-influenced calves (73 heifers, 113 bulls) were weaned at 211 ± 1 days of age (day 0). At weaning, calves were ranked by sex and BW, and assigned to receive BAS (Nutricorp, Araras, SP, Brazil; n = 94) or water (CON; n = 92). Treatments (5 ml) were topically applied to the nuchal skin area of each animal. Calf BW was recorded and samples of blood and tail-switch hair were collected on days 0, 15 and 45. Calves that received BAS had greater (P < 0.01) BW gain from day 0 to 15 compared with CON. Overall BW gain (days 0 to 45) and BW on days 15 and 45 were also greater (P ≤ 0.03) in BAS v. CON. Plasma haptoglobin concentration was less (P < 0.01) in BAS v. CON on day 15, whereas cortisol concentrations in plasma and tail-switch hair did not differ between treatments (P ≥ 0.13). In experiment 2, 140 B. indicus-influenced bulls (∼27 months of age) from 2 different pasture-based systems (70 bulls/origin) were transported to a commercial feedlot (≤ 200-km transport; day -1). On day 0, bulls were ranked by source and BW, and assigned to receive BAS (n = 70) or CON (n = 70) and the same sampling procedures as in experiment 1. Bulls receiving BAS had greater (P = 0.04) BW gain from day 0 to 15, but less (P < 0.01) BW gain from day 15 to 45 compared to CON. No other treatment effects were detected (P > 0.14). Therefore, BAS administration to beef calves alleviated the haptoglobin response associated with weaning, and improved calf growth during the subsequent 45 days. Administration of BAS to beef bulls at feedlot entry improved BW gain during the initial 15 days, but these benefits were not sustained throughout the 45-day experiment.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archunan, G, Rajanarayanan, S and Karthikeyan, K 2014. Cattle pheromones. In Neurobiology of chemical communication (ed. Mucignat-Caretta, C), pp. 461488. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdick, NC, Banta, JP, Neuendorff, DA, White, JC, Vann, RC, Laurenz, JC, Welsh, Jr TH and Randel, RD 2009. Interrelationships among growth, endocrine, immune, and temperament variables in neonatal Brahman calves. Journal of Animal Science 87, 32023210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, JA and Forsberg, NE 2007. Influence of stress and nutrition on cattle immunity. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 23, 105149.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooke, RF 2014. Temperament and acclimation to human handling influence growth, health, and reproductive responses in Bos taurus and B. indicus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92, 53255333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, RF 2017. Nutritional and management considerations for beef cattle experiencing stress-induced inflammation. The Professional Animal Scientist 33, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, RF and Arthington, JD 2013. Concentrations of haptoglobin in bovine plasma determined by ELISA or a colorimetric method based on peroxidase activity: methods to determine haptoglobin in bovine plasma. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 97, 531536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FASS 2010. Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in agricultural research and teaching, 3rd edition. Federation of Animal Science Societies, Savoy, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Osella, MC, Cozzi, A, Spegis, C, Turille, G, Barmaz, A, Lecuelle, CL, Teruel, E, Bienboire-Frosini, C, Chabaud, C, Bougrat, L and Pageat, P 2018. The effects of a synthetic analogue of the Bovine Appeasing Pheromone on milk yield and composition in Valdostana dairy cows during the move from winter housing to confined lowland pastures. Journal of Dairy Research 85, 174177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, WJ, Williams, IH and Moir, RJ. 1993. Compensatory growth in sheep and cattle: growth pattern and feed intake. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44, 16091621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubach, KM, Cooke, RF, Brandão, AP, Lippolis, KD, Silva, LG, Marques, RS and Bohnert, DW 2017. Impacts of stocking density on development and puberty attainment of replacement beef heifers. Animal 11, 22602267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Cooke et al. supplementary material

Cooke et al. supplementary material

Download Cooke et al. supplementary material(File)
File 27.1 KB