Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:45:45.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dietary selenium supplementation on tissue selenium distribution and glutathione peroxidase activity in Chinese Ring Necked Pheasants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2012

D. T. Juniper  and
G. Bertin
D. T. Juniper*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
G. Bertin
Affiliation:
Erawan Consulting SARL, Asnières Affaires, 25 Rue de Bas, Asniéres sur Seine, France
*
†E-mail: d.t.juniper@reading.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the concentration of total selenium (Se) and the proportions of total Se comprised as selenomethionine (SeMet) and selenocysteine (SeCys) in the postmortem tissues of female pheasants (Phasianus Colchicus Torquator) offered diets that contained graded additions of selenised-enriched yeast (SY) or a single comparative dose of sodium selenite (SS). Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and tissue glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity of breast (Pectoralis Major) were assessed at 0 and 5 days postmortem. A total of 216 female pheasant chicks were enrolled into the study. Twenty-four birds were euthanased at the start of the study, and samples of blood, breast muscle, leg muscle (M. Peroneus Longus and M. Gastrocnemius), heart, liver, kidney and gizzard were collected for determination of total Se. Remaining birds were blocked by live weight and randomly allocated to one of four dietary treatments (n = 48 birds/treatment) that either differed in Se source (SY v. SS) or dose (control (0.17 mg total Se/kg), SY-L and SS-L (0.3 mg/kg total Se as SY and SS, respectively) and SY-H (0.45 mg total Se/kg)). Following 42 and 91 days of treatment, 24 birds per treatment were euthanased, and samples of blood, breast muscle, leg muscle, heart, liver, kidney and gizzard were retained for determination of total Se and the proportion of total Se comprised as SeMet or SeCys. Whole blood GSH-Px activity was determined at each time point. Tissue GSH-Px activity and TBARS were determined in breast tissue at the end of the study. There were increases in both blood and tissues to the graded addition of SY to the diet (P < 0.001), but the same responses were not apparent with the blood and tissues of selenite-supplemented birds receiving a comparable dose (SY-L v. SS-L). Although there were differences between tissue types in the distribution of SeMet and SeCys, there were few differences between treatments. There were effects of treatment on erythrocyte GSH-Px activity (P = 0.012) with values being higher in treatments SY-H and SS-L when compared with the negative control and treatment SY-L. There were no effects of treatment on tissue GSH-Px activity, which is reflected in the overall lack of any treatment effects on TBARS.

Keywords

pheasantseleniumselenocysteineselenomethionineglutathione peroxidase
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 2013 , pp. 562 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, PH, Berrett, S, Patterson, DSP 1978. Glutathione peroxidase activity in erythrocytes and muscle of cattle and sheep and its relationship to selenium. Journal of Comparative Pathology 88, 181–189.Google Scholar
Banoch, T, Fajt, Z, Odehnalova, S, Drabek, J, Svoboda, M 2009. Evaluation of selenium status in pure bred Duroc sows and their progeny. Neuroendocrinology Letters 30 (Suppl), 143–147.Google Scholar
Bierla, K, Vacchina, V, Szpunar, J, Bertin, G, Lobinski, R 2008a. Simultaneous derivatization of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in animal blood prior to their specific determination by 2D size exclusion ion-pairing reversed phase HPLC-ICP MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 23, 508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierla, K, Vacchina, V, Szpunar, J, Bertin, G, Lobinski, R 2008b. Determination of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in edible animal tissues by 2D size-exclusion reversed-phase HPLC-ICP MS following carbamidomethylation and proteolytic extraction. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 390, 1789–1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, RF, Hill, KE, Xia, Y 2005. Selenoproteins and the human selenium requirement. 12th International Symposium on Trace Elements in Man and Animals (TEMA), 19–23 June 2005, Coleraine, N. Ireland.Google Scholar
Daun, C, Johansson, M, Önning, G, Åkesson, B 2000. Glutathione peroxidase activity, tissue and soluble selenium content in beef and pork in relation to meat ageing and pig RN phenotype. Food Chemistry 73, 313–319.Google Scholar
DeVore, VR, Greene, BE 1982. Glutathione peroxidase in post-rigor bovine semitendinosus muscle. Journal of Food Science 47, 1406–1409.Google Scholar
DeVore, VR, Colnago, GL, Jensen, LS, Greene, BE 1983. Thiobarbituric acid values and glutathione peroxidase activity in meat from chickens fed a selenium supplemented diet. Journal of Food Science 48, 300–301.Google Scholar
Echevarria, MG, Henry, CB, Ammerman, PV, Miles, RD 1988. Estimation of the relative bioavailability of inorganic selenium sources for poultry. 1. Effect of time and high dietary selenium on tissue selenium uptake. Poultry Science 67, 1295–1301.Google Scholar
Gunter, SA, Beck, PA, Phillips, JM 2003. Effects of supplementary selenium source on the performance of blood measurements in beef cows and their calves. Journal of Animal Science 81, 856–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Home Office 1986. Animal Scientific Procedures Act 1986. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Bertin, G 2011. Effect of dietary supplementation with selenium-enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in commercial-line turkeys. Animal 5, 1751–1760.Google Scholar
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008a. Effects of dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 149, 228–239.Google Scholar
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008b. Effect of dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 3100–3109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, YY, Mahan, DC 2001. Effect of dietary selenium source, level, and pig hair colour on various selenium indices. Journal of Animal Science 79, 949–955.Google Scholar
Mahan, DC, Parrett, NA 1996. Evaluating the efficacy of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite on tissue selenium retention and serum glutathione peroxidase activity in grower and finisher swine. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2967–2974.Google Scholar
Mahan, DC, Cline, TR, Richert, B 1999. Effects of dietary levels of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing–finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics, and loin quality. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2172–2179.Google Scholar
Mester, Z, Willie, S, Sturgeon, R, Caruso, JA, Fernandez, M, Fodor, P, Goldschmidt, RJ, Goenaga-Infante, H, Lobinski, R, Wolf, WR 2006. Certification of a new selenized yeast reference material (selm-1) for methionine, selenomethinone and total selenium content and its use in an intercomparison exercise for quantifying of these analytes. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 385, 168–180.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th edition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pan, C, Huang, K, Zhao, Y, Qin, S, Chen, F, Hu, Q 2007. Effect of selenium source and level in hen's diet on tissue selenium deposition and egg selenium concentrations. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 55, 1027–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paglia, DE, Valentine, WN 1967. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 70, 158–168.Google Scholar
Petrovič, V, Boldižárová, K, Faix, S, Mellen, M, Arpášová, H, Leng, L 2006. Antioxidant and selenium status of laying hens fed with diets supplemented with selenite or Se-yeast. Journal of Animal Feed Science 15, 435–444.Google Scholar
Phipps, RH, Grandison, AS, Jones, AK, Juniper, DT, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008. Selenium supplementation of lactating dairy cows: effects on milk production an total selenium content and speciation in blood, milk and cheese. Animal 2, 1610–1618.Google Scholar
Radmilla, M, Jovanovic, BI, Baltic, ZM, Sefer, D, Petrujkic, B, Sinovec, Z 2008. Effects of selenium supplementation as sodium selenite or selenized yeast and different amounts of vitamin E on selenium and vitamin E status in broilers. Acta Veterinaria-Beograd 58, 369–380.Google Scholar
Rotruck, JT, Pope, AL, Ganther, HE, Swanson, AB, Hafeman, DG, Hoekestra, WG 1973. Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179, 588–590.Google Scholar
Sevcikova, S, Skrivan, M, Dlouha, G, Koucky, M 2006. The effect of selenium source on the performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. Czech Journal of Animal Science 51, 449–457.Google Scholar
Skřivanová, E, Marounek, M, De Smet, S, Raes, K 2007. Influence of dietary selenium and vitamin E on quality of veal. Meat Science 76, 495–500.Google Scholar
Surai, PF 2006. Selenium absorption and metabolism. In Selenium nutrition and health (ed. PF Surai), pp. 161–171. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Tarladgis, BG, Watts, BM, Younathan, MT 1960. A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. Journal of the American Chemical Society 37, 44–48.Google Scholar
Taylor, JB, Marchello, MJ, Finley, JW, Neville, TL, Combs, GF, Caton, JS 2008. Nutritive value and display life attributes of selenium enriched beef muscle foods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21, 183–186.Google Scholar
Underwood, EJ, Suttle, NF 2001. The mineral nutrition of livestock, 3rd edition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Van Ryssen, JBJ, Deagen, JT, Beilstein, MA, Whanger, PD 1989. Comparative metabolism of organic and inorganic selenium by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 37, 1358–1363.Google Scholar
Wang, YB, Xu, BH 2008. Effect of different selenium source (sodium selenite and selenium yeast) on broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 306–314.Google Scholar
Yoon, I, Werner, TM, Butler, JM 2007. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 86, 727–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed