Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2013
On the road from new Sparta to Magoula the most noticeable remains of the ancient city are the extensive brick ruins called ‘Arapissa,’ from the localization here of a legend common in all parts of Greece of a negress or a negro guarding buried treasure. Since so large a building, if it existed in the time of Pausanias, is not likely to have been omitted by him in his description of the city, it was decided to test this site to determine its nature and date. Accordingly from April 20th to the 30th twenty-five men were employed digging round the walls visible above the surface, and sinking trial-pits in other parts to obtain some idea of the plan. Owing to the apparent want of symmetry and to the loose nature of the soil, which was full of rubble, the work proved more difficult and dangerous than had been anticipated.
page 408 note 1 The letters refer to the Plan, Fig. 1.
page 410 note 1 Here there is a small piece of later wall built on the earlier foundations.
page 411 note 1 v. p. 422.
page 412 note 1 For an architrave supported by herms compare the stucco reliefs from the Farnesina, Helbig,2 ii. p. 236, 1120.
page 412 note 2 v. S.M.C., p. 129, Fig. 25.
page 413 note 1 Inv. No. 2196.
page 413 note 2 It is so called in the Expédition de Morée, ii. p. 65, Pl. 46, C, D.
page 414 note 1 Cf. Richter, , Topographie der Stadt Rom, Pl. 17Google Scholar; Middleton, , Remains of Ancient Rome, ii. pp. 154, 178, 185.Google Scholar
page 414 note 2 The baths at Pompeii are not symmetrical, v. Mau-Kelsey, Pompeii, Figs. 81, 86.
page 414 note 3 v. page 415.
page 414 note 4 Inv. Nos. 2197, 2257.