Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:50:31.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SG-APSIC1038: Hospital-wide study to evaluate the tolerability and acceptability of alcohol-based hand rubs according to WHO protocol, and healthcare worker hand hygiene behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Yew Fong Lee
Affiliation:
Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Malaysia
Wei Hong Lai
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Centre, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Kuching, Malaysia
Peh Yee Lee
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Sarawak General Hospital Kuching, Malaysia
Samual Chuo Yew Ting
Affiliation:
Pharmaceutical Services Division, Sarawak State Health Department, Kuching, Malaysia
Irena Albert Nuja
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Malaysia
Hie Ung Ngian
Affiliation:
Hospital Director’s Office, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Malaysia
Jiancong Wang
Affiliation:
Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives: To evaluate the tolerability and acceptability of 3 different alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) products, and to determine factors influencing hand hygiene (HH) behavior among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sarawak General Hospital, a 1,034-bed tertiary-care state hospital. A self-administered 7-point Likert scale questionnaire was adapted from the WHO ‘Protocol for Evaluation of Tolerability and Acceptability of ABHR.’ The study was conducted between November 12 and 26, 2021, based on 3 types of ABHR products. Participation in answering the questionnaire was voluntary, so consent was implied. The Student t test was used to determine the significant differences among the ABHR product. The χ2 distribution test was performed to evaluate the characteristics of ABHR products. Results: We received a response rate of 35% (1,598 of 4,628); 82% of respondents were female, and the overall cohort had a mean age of 35 years. Also, 972 (61%) of 1,598 respondents were nurses, and 1,490 (93%) of 1,598 respondents used ABHR at least 5 days every week. Of 1,598 respondents, 1,156 (72%) indicated that ABHR products were easily accessible at the point of patient care. Evaluation of ABHR products showed that respondents were receptive to all product colors (P < .0114) and had no color preference (P > .05). Comparison among ABHR products yielded no statistical difference (P > .05) for ‘smell,’ ‘stickiness,’ ‘irritation,’ or ‘drying speed.’ ‘Drying effect’ of all products was statistically significant (P < .0252). The overall satisfaction for all products was good (P < .0022). HCWs did not expect their HH compliance to improve even if they were provided with their preferred choice of ABHR. Of 1,598 respondents, 783 (49%) correctly used a palm-full of ABHR for HH, and 1, 275 (80%) indicated that hospital management should organize more HH-related awareness and continuous medical education on HH. Conclusions: A comparison among different ABHR characteristics mostly showed no statistically significant difference regarding tolerability and acceptability. These findings suggest that different ABHR products will not influence HH behavior during COVID-19 pandemic.

Type
Hand Hygiene
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America