Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:19:55.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ruined Church of Stone-by-Faversham: Second Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Summary

Further work was undertaken in the nave of the ruined church at Stone-by-Faversham in 1971–2 as part of the programme of its consolidation as an Ancient Monument by the Department of the Environment. Evidence was found for a pre-Conquest stone nave, itself possibly preceded by a timber nave; the stone nave was extended westwards in the twelfth or thirteenth century. West of the pre-Conquest nave there were traces of a Roman building distinct from the Roman mausoleum incorporated in the chancel of the church. The dating evidence of Roman and Saxon coins and pottery is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Antiq. Journ. xlix (1969), 273–94Google Scholar.

2 There may be at Lullingstone and possibly elsewhere in Kent places where the foundations and materials of a Roman mausoleum have been subsequently used for a Christian building. See Rigold, S. E., ‘Roman Folkestone Reconsidered’, Archacologia Cantiana, Ixxxvii (1972), 3141 and esp. 38-41Google Scholar.

3 Frere, S. S., ‘The End of Towns in Roman Britain’, in Wacher, J. S., ed., The Civitas Capitals of Roman Britain (Leicester, 1966), pp. 90–3Google Scholar. Jenkins, F. in Archaeologia Cantiana, lxxx (1965), lixGoogle Scholar, lxxxi (1966), lxvi, lxxxii (1967), lx.

4 Myres, J. N. L., Anglo-Saxon Pottery and the Settlement of England (Oxford, 1969), pp. 162–3Google Scholar, 182-3, 226-9.

5 Rigold, S. E., ‘Two Camerae of the Military Orders: Strood Temple, Kent, and Harefield, Middlesex’, Archaeological Journal, cxxii (1965), 127–8Google Scholar.

6 Loc. cit. 286 and pl. LVIIId.