Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T23:19:51.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marcos Llobera
Marcos Llobera*
Affiliation:
Donald Baden-Powell Quaternary Research Centre, University of Oxford, 60 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The later-prehistoric linear ditches that divide the chalk landscape of Wessex, south England, are markers in an area. It is a topographic space. The ditches seem to be placed with a view to their visibility in the landscape. It is a human topographic space. A GIS study of the ditches' place, in terms of what a human sees in moving acros undulating ground, goes beyond that environmental determinism which underlies many GIS studies.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 269 , September 1996 , pp. 612 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J. C. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity – an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., Criado Boado, F. & Fabregas Valcarce, R.. 1994. Rock art research as landscape archaeology: a pilot-study in Galicia, northwest Spain, World Archaeology 25 (3): 374–91.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., Entwhistle, R. & Raymond, F.. 1994. Prehistoric land divisions on Salisbury Plain: the work of the Wessex Linear Ditches Project. London: English Heritage. Archaeological Report 2.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. (ed.) 1972. Models in archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 1989. Geography is everywhere: culture and symbolism in human landscapes, in Gregory, D. & Walford, R. (ed.), Horizonsin human geography. 118–35. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P. F. 1993. Algorithm and implementation uncertainty in viewshed analysis, International Journal of Geographical Systems 7 (4): 331–47.Google Scholar
Gaffney, V. & Van Leusen, M.. 1995. GIS, environment determinism and archeology: a parallel text, in Lock, & Stancic, (ed.): 367–82.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. 1994. Social being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Haggett, P. 1971. Locational models in human geography. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987. converging traditions: the search for symbolic meanings in archaeology and geography, in Wagstaff, J. M. (ed.): Landscape and culture: 134–45. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. & Orton, C.. 1976. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1986. The appropriation of nature – essays on human ecology and social relations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1992. Perception of the environment, in Croll, E. & Parkin, D. (ed.), Bush Base: Forest Farm – culture, environment and development: 39–56. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1993. The temporality of the landscape, World Archaeology 25 (2): 152–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lock, G. & Stancic, Z. (ed.). 1995. GIS in archaeology: a European perspective. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Pred, A. 1986. Place, practice and structure: social and spatial transformation in southern Sweden. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1993a. The hermeneutics of megalithic space, in Tilley, (ed.): 73–98.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1993b. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape, in Bender, B. (ed.), Landscape: politics and perspectives: 19–48. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tllley, C. (ed.) 1993. Interpretative archaeology. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tllley, C. (ed.) 1994. A phenomenology of landscape. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Wheatley, D. 1995. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeology application, in Lock, & Stancic, (ed.): 171–86.Google Scholar
Zubrow, E. B.W. 1994. Knowledge representation and archaeology: a cognitive example using GIS, in Renfrew, C. & Zubrow, E.B.W. (ed.), The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. 107–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar