Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T01:23:42.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Has ethnoarchaeology come of age?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ann B. Stahl
Ann B. Stahl*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Binghamton NY 13902-6000, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 69 , Issue 263 , June 1995 , pp. 404 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kleindienst, M.R. & Watson, P.J. 1956. ‘Action archeology’: the archeological inventory of a living community, Anthropology Tomorrow. 5: 75–8.Google Scholar
Stahl, A.B. 1993. Concepts of time and approaches to analogical reasoning in historical perspective, American Antiquity 58: 253–60.Google Scholar
Stahl, A.B. 1994. Change and continuity in the Banda Area, Ghana: the direct historical approach, Journal of Field Archaeology 21: 181–203.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1985. The reaction against analogy, in Schiffer, M.B. (ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory 8: 63–111. New York (NY): Academic.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1988. ‘Simple’ analogy and the role of relevance assumptions: implications of archaeological practice, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2: 134–50.Google Scholar