Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:17:49.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kelley Hays-Gilpin & David S. Whitley (ed).). Reader in gender archaeology. x+384 pages. 1998. London & New York (NY): Routledge. 0-415-17360-4 paperback £18.99. David S. Whitley. Reader in archaeological theory: Post-processual and cognitive approaches. xiv+347 pages. 1998. London: Routledge; 0-415-14159-1 hardback £55; 0-415-14160-5 paperback £16.99 - David S. Whitley. Reader in archaeological theory: post-processual and cognitive approaches. xiv+347 pages. 1998. London: Routledge; 0-415-14159-1 hardback E55: 0-415-14160-5 paperback $16.99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marcia-Anne Dobres
Marcia-Anne Dobres*
Affiliation:
Archaeological Research Facility, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley (CA), dobres@QAL.berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book reviews
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 280 , June 1999 , pp. 479 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kehoe, A. 1998. The land of prehistory: A critical history of American archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Preucel, R. & Hodder, I.. 1996. Contemporary archaeology in theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverblatt, I. 1988. Women in states, Annual Review of Anthropology 17: 427–60.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar