Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:04:55.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Space and movement in an Iron Age oppidum: integrating geophysical and topographic survey at Entremont, Provence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Ian Armit ,
Chris Gaffney  and
Ashley Hayes
Ian Armit
Affiliation:
Archaeological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK (for correspondence email: i.armit@bradford.ac.uk)
Chris Gaffney
Affiliation:
Archaeological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK (for correspondence email: i.armit@bradford.ac.uk)
Ashley Hayes
Affiliation:
Archaeological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK (for correspondence email: i.armit@bradford.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The famous Celtic site of Entremont, well known for its head cult and warrior statues, is a heritage gem of southern France. This naturally inhibits further excavation there, but the authors show just how much can be achieved through an integrated package of remote mapping techniques. Their exemplary methodology produced more than a high resolution plan of the unexcavated part of the site; this type of integrated procedure generates ground-breaking research, without breaking any ground. Here the investigation mobilised arguments for pre-urban monuments, and the activities, enclosures, entrances and circulation of the oppidum.

Keywords

FranceEntremontLate Iron Age (third to second century BC)topographic surveygeophysical surveyGPRoppidumurbanism
Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 86 , Issue 331 , March 2012 , pp. 191 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arcelin, P. 2000. Arles protohistorique, agglomération et structuration urbaine, in Baudat, M. (ed.) Espace et urbanisme d'Arles des origines à nos jours: 7–23. Arles: Groupe Archéologique Arlésien.Google Scholar
Arcelin, P. 2004a. Entremont et la sculpture du second âge du Fer en Provence. Documents d'Archéologie Méridionale 27: 71–84.Google Scholar
Arcelin, P. 2004b. Les prémices du phénomène urbain à l'âge du Fer en Gaule méridionale: les agglomérations de la basse vallée du Rhône. Gallia 61: 223–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcelin, P. 2006. Avant Aquae Sextiae: l'oppidum d'Entremont, in Mocci, F. & Nin, N. (ed.) Aix-en-Provence, Pays d'Aix, Val de Durance (Carte Archéologique de la Gaule No. 13/4): 125–68. Paris: Fondation Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Arcelin, P. & Rapin, A.. 2003. L'iconographie anthropomorphe de l'Age du Fer en Gaule Méditerranéene, in Büchsenschütz, O., Bulard, A., Chardenoux, M.-B. & Ginoux, N. (ed.) Décors, images et signes de l'Age du Fer européen. XXVI Colloque de l'Association Française pour l'Etude de l'Age du Fer, Paris et Saint-Denis, 2002: 183–220. Tours: FERACF.Google Scholar
Armit, I. 2003. Towers in the north: the brochs of Scotland. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Armit, I. 2010. Porticos, pillars and severed heads: the display and curation of human remains in the southern French Iron Age, in Rebay-Salisbury, K., Stigsørensen, M.-L. & Hughes, J. (ed.) Body parts and bodies whole: 90–100. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Armit, I. 2012. Headhunting and the body in Iron Age Europe.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armit, I., Horsley, T. & Marty, F.. 2008, Geophysical survey on a southern French oppidum. PAST 58: 3–5.Google Scholar
Aspinall, A., Gaffney, C. & Schmidt, A.. 2008. Magnetometry for archaeologists. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira.Google Scholar
Belarte, M. C., Gailledrat, E. & Principal, J.. 2011. The functional and symbolic uses of space in western Mediterranean protohistory: the Pech Maho example (Sigean, western Languedoc, France). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 30: 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoît, F. 1975. The Celtic oppidum of Entremont, in Bruce-Mitford, R. (ed.) Recent archaeological excavations in Europe: 227–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernard, L. 2000. L'habitat préromain du Verduron, in Chausserie-Laprée, J. (ed.) Les temps des Gaulois en Provence: 158–60. Martigues: Musée Ziem.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1950. The urban revolution. Town Planning Review 21: 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chausserie-Laprée, C. 2005. Martigues, terre Gauloise entre Celtique et Méditerranée. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Congès, G. 2004. La statuaire d'Entremont; réflexions sur d'anciennes découvertes. Documents d'Archéologie Méridionale 27: 63–70.Google Scholar
Conyers, L. 2004. Ground-Penetrating Radar for archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira.Google Scholar
Dedet, B. 1992. Rites funéraires protohistoriques dans les garrigues Languedociennes (Revue Archéologique de Narbonnaise Supplément 24). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Ebel, C. 1976. Transalpine Gaul: the emergence of a Roman province. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gaffney, C. F. 2008. Detecting trends in prospecting for the past: fifty years of geophysical survey. Archaeometry 50: 313–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, D. 2004. La Celtique Méditerranéenne. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Harding, A. & Raczkowski, W.. 2010. Living on the lake in the Iron Age: new results from aerial photographs, geophysical survey and dendrochronology on sites of Biskupin type. Antiquity 84: 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccartney, M. 2006. Finding fear in the Iron Age of southern France. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 2: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, R. 2005. Urban sprawl: what is urbanization and why does it matter, in Osborne, R. & Cunliffe, B.W. (ed.) Mediterranean Urbanization 800-600 BC: 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Py, M. 1990, Culture, économie et société dans la région Nimoise. 2 vols (Collection de l' école Françise de Rome 131). Rome: École Françise de Rome.Google Scholar
Roth Congès, A. 2004. Le contexte archéologique de la statuaire de Glanon (Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, Bouches-du-Rhône). Documents d'Archéologie Méridionale 27: 23–43.Google Scholar
Rothé, M.-P. & Tréziny, H.. 2005. Marseille et ses alentours (Carte Archéologique de la Gaule No. 13/3). Paris: Fondation Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Salviat, F. 1993, La sculpture d'Entremont, in Coutagne, D. (ed.) Archéologie d'Entremont au Musée Granet: 165–239. Aix-en-Provence: Association des Amis de Musée Granet.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Gaffney, C. F., Gater, J. A. & Wood, E.. 2005. Fluxgate gradiometry and Square Array resistance survey at Drumlanrig, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland. Archaeological Prospection 12: 131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1958 (1921). The city. New York: Neuwirth.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1958. Review of ‘Entremont: capitale Celto-Ligure des Salyens de Provence’ by F. Benoct. Journal of Roman Studies 48: 211–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar