Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:45:54.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language assessment and intervention for the learning disabled. Elisabeth Wiig & Eleanor Semel. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, Publishing Company, 1980. Pp. x + 452.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Nan E. Bernstein
Affiliation:
Boston University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bountress, N.Attitudes and training of public school clinicians providing services to speakers of Black English. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 1980, 11, 4149.Google Scholar
Brown, R.A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, F.Evaluation of appraisal techniques in speech and language pathology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
De Villiers, P. A., & De Villiers, J. G.Early judgements of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1972, 1, 299310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flood, J., & Menyuk, P. Detection of ambiguity and production of paraphrase in written language. Presentation to National Institute of Education Workshop on Writing, Washington, D.C., 06, 1979.Google Scholar
Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. Language use and language judgement. In Fillmore, C., Kempler, D., & Wang, W. (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Lindfors, J.Children’s language and learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P.That’s the ‘same’, ‘another’, ‘funny’, ‘awful’ way of saying it: The development of meta-linguistic abilities. Journal of Education, 1976, 158, 2538.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P.Syntactic competence and reading. In J. Stark (Ed.), Language learning and reading disabilities: a new decade. Preliminary proceedings of an interdisciplinary conference, Queens College of the City of New York, 05, 1981.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Review of the Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. In Darley, F. (Ed.), Evaluation of appraisal techniques in speech and language pathology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, L., & Gleitman, H. Mother, I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Olson, G. M. Developmental changes in memory and the acquisition of language. In Moore, T. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., & Stark, R. Speech perception of language delayed children. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanaugh, J., & Ferguson, C. (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 2). Perception. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Williams, R., & Wolfram, W. Social dialects: Differences versus disorders. Rockville, Md.: American Speech and Hearing Association, 1977.Google Scholar
Zhurova, L. The development of analysis of words into their sounds by preschool children. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.Google Scholar