Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:27:51.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fetishizing the Romans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2014

Peter van Dommelen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Miguel John Versluys offers a richly textured essay in an attempt to resuscitate the concept of Romanization, which he has found to have been nearly flogged to death, to paraphrase an oft-quoted characterization of the Romanization debate in recent years. To be more precise, he argues that certain quarters of Romanist academia have ‘ganged up’ on the concept over the last decade or so and that others – the implicitly silent majority – have begun to stage a comeback in recent years. Versluys's self-imposed mission is to shore up the Roman resurgence with freshly cut intellectual joists.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , June 2014 , pp. 41 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendana, K., 2002: L'Afrique du Nord en marche de Charles André Julien et L'histoire du Maghreb d'Abdallah Laroui. Lecture croisée, in Hermès. Histoire en reseau des Méditerranées (Historiographie des décolonisations et des nationalismes du Maghreb), available at www.hermes.jussieu.fr/rephisto.php?id=64.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H., 1994: The location of culture, London.Google Scholar
Cusick, J., 1998: Historiography of acculturation. An evaluation of concepts and their application in archaeology (Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 25), in Cusick, J. (ed.), Studies in culture contact. Interaction, culture change and archaeology, Carbondale, 126–45.Google Scholar
Delgado, A., and Cano, G. (eds), 2008: De Tartessos a Manila. Siete estudios coloniales y postcoloniales, Valencia.Google Scholar
Dietler, M., 2005: The archaeology of colonization and the colonization of archaeology. Theoretical reflections on an ancient Mediterranean colonial encounter, in Stein, G. (ed.), The archaeology of colonial encounters. Comparative perspectives, Santa Fe (School of American Research Advanced Seminars Series), 33–68.Google Scholar
Dietler, M., 2010: Archaeologies of colonialism. Consumption, entanglement, and violence in ancient Mediterranean France, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Freeman, P., 1996: Mommsen through to Haverfield. The origins of Romanization studies in late 19th-c. Britain, in Mattingly, D. (ed.), Dialogues in Roman imperialism. Power, discourse, and discrepant experience in the Roman Empire, Portsmouth, RI (Journal of Roman archaeology Supplementary Series 23), 27–50.Google Scholar
Freeman, P., 2007: The best training ground for archaeologists. Francis Haverfield and the invention of Romano-British studies, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gallini, C., 1973: Che cosa intendere per ellenizzazione. Problemi di metodo, Dialoghi di Archeologia 7, 175–91.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., 2013: Thinking about Roman imperialism. Postcolonialism, globalisation and beyond?, Britannia 44, 1–25.Google Scholar
Goff, B. (ed.), 2005: Classics & colonialism, London.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A., 2010: Colonialism and European archaeology, in Lydon, J. and Rizvi, U.Z. (eds), Handbook of postcolonial archaeology, Walnut Creek (World Archaeological Congress Research Handbooks in Archaeology 3), 39–50.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. (ed.), 1997: Culture contact and colonialism (World archaeology 28(3)), London.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E., 2009: Postcolonialism, in Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B. and Vasunia, P. (eds), The Oxford handbook of Hellenic studies, Oxford, 653–64.Google Scholar
Gruzinski, S., and Rouveret, A., 1976: Ellos son como niños. Histoire et acculturation dans le Mexique colonial et l'Italie méridionale avant la romanisation, Mélanges de l'Ecole française de Rome. Antiquité 88 (1), 159–219.Google Scholar
Guha, R., 1982: Subaltern Studies I. Writings on South Asian history and society, Dehli (Oxford India Paperbacks).Google Scholar
Hastrup, K. (ed.), 1992: Other histories, London (European Association of Social Anthropology).Google Scholar
Hingley, R., 1996: The ‘legacy’ of Rome: the rise, decline and fall of the theory of Romanisation, in Webster, J. and Cooper, N. (eds), Roman imperialism: Post-colonial perspectives, Leicester (Leicester Archaeology Monographs 3), 35–48.Google Scholar
Jiménez Díez, A., 2008: Imagines hibridae. Una aproximación postcolonialista al estudio de las necrópolis de la Bética, Madrid (Anejos de AEspA 43).Google Scholar
Jiménez Díez, A., 2010: Reproducing difference. Mimesis and colonialism in Roman Hispania, in van Dommelen, P. and Knapp, A.B. (eds), Material connections in the ancient Mediterranean, London and New York, 38–63.Google Scholar
Liebmann, M., 2008: Introduction. The intersections of archaeology and postcolonial studies, in Liebmann, M. and Rizvi, U. (eds), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique, Lanham, MD (Archaeology in Society), 1–20.Google Scholar
Marchand, S., 1996: Down from Olympus: Archaeology and philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, M., 1990: The Romanization of Britain. An essay in archaeological interpretation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Millett, M., Roymans, N. and Slofstra, J. (eds), 1995: Integration in the early Roman West. The role of culture and ideology, Luxembourg (Dossiers d'archeologie du Musée national d'histoire et d'art 4).Google Scholar
Parry, B., 1994: Resistance theory/theorising resistance or two cheers for nativism, in Barker, F., Hulme, P. and Iversen, M. (eds), Colonial discourse/postcolonial theory, Manchester, 172–93.Google Scholar
Patterson, T., 2008: A brief history of postcolonial theory and implications for archaeology, in Liebmann, M. and Rizvi, U. (eds), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique, Lanham, MD (Archaeology in Society), 21–34.Google Scholar
Said, E., 1978: Orientalism, New York.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P., and Patterson, T. (eds), 1995: Making alternative histories. The practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Shanin, T. (ed.), 1971: Peasants and peasant societies, London.Google Scholar
Silliman, S., 2005: Culture contact or colonialism? Challenges in the archaeology of native North America, American antiquity 70 (1), 55–75.Google Scholar
Silliman, S., 2013: What, where, and when is hybridity? (Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 39), in Card, J. (ed.), The archaeology of hybrid material culture, Carbondale, IL, 486–500.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1983: An anthropological approach to the study of Romanization processes, in Brandt, R. and Slofstra, J. (eds), Roman and Native in the Low Countries. Spheres of interaction, Oxford (BAR International Series 184), 71–104.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 2002b: Story-telling and theory. A reply, Archaeological dialogues 9, 55–57.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A., 2002: A paradigm shift in classical archaeology?, Cambridge archaeological journal 12 (2), 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G., 1985: Can the subaltern speak? Speculations on widow sacrifice, Wedge 7–8, 120–30.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, P., 2006: Colonial matters. Material culture and postcolonial theory in colonial situations, in Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuechler-Fogden, S., Rowlands, M. and Spyer, P. (eds), Handbook of material culture, Los Angeles, 104–24.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, P., 2011: Postcolonial archaeologies between discourse and practice, World archaeology 43 (1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, P., 2012: Colonialism and migration in the ancient Mediterranean, Annual review of anthropology 41, 393–409.Google Scholar
Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, J., 2005: Negociando encuentros. Situaciones coloniales e intercambios en la costa oriental de la península Ibérica (ss. VIII-VI a.C.), Barcelona (Cuadernos de Arqueología Mediterránea 12).Google Scholar
Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, J., 2008: Negotiating colonial encounters. Hybrid practices and consumption in eastern Iberia (8th–6th centuries BC) Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 21 (2), 241–72.Google Scholar
Webster, J., and Cooper, N. (eds), 1996: Roman imperialism: Post-colonial perspectives, Leicester (Leicester Archaeology Monographs 3).Google Scholar
Wolf, E., 1966: Peasants, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Wolf, E., 1982: Europe and the people without history, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Woolf, G., 2002: Generations of aristocracy. Continuities and discontinuities in the societies of interior Gaul, Archaeological dialogues 9, 2–15.Google Scholar
Young, R., 2001: Postcolonialism. An historical introduction, Oxford.Google Scholar