Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2016
When the Society of Architectural Historians visited Little Wenham Hall in September 1998 Edward Martin’s conference notes presented it in the light of a relatively new interpretation of such lordly buildings. This interpretation generally rejects the old view that they are ‘upper halls’ on the grounds that they are instead chamber blocks that have lost the hall ranges on which they once depended. While this seemed to offer a plausible explanation of Little Wenham Hall, it was not entirely convincing (Fig. 1). As a matter of record the Society also visited both Framlingham Castle, which contains the ruins of a possibly similar domestic structure, again now thought to be a chamber block dependent on a lost hall range, and Colchester Castle, of which more below.
There has always been something curious, if not exotic, in that all-embracing category of post-Conquest stone domestic building known as the ‘upper hall’. It rose from the wastes of the Dark Ages like a shooting star to glitter briefly in the twelfth century only to fade away slowly a century or so later. The new explanation that its function was different from that of the hall and was moreover dependent on an open hall is therefore compelling: after all, open halls and dependent chamber blocks have a well-established pedigree.
1 Martin, E., ‘Little Wenham Hall’, Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain, Annual Conference Notes, 3–6 September 1998, pp. 22–25 Google Scholar.
2 Faulkner, P. A., ‘Domestic planning from the 12th to 14th centuries’, Archaeological Journal, 115 (1958), pp. 150–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Jones, R. H., Medieval Houses at Flaxengate, Lincoln, The Archaeology of Lincoln, vol. XI, 1 (London, 1980), p. 46 Google Scholar.
4 Turner, T. H., Some Account of Domestic Architecture in England, vol. 1 (Oxford, 1851), pp. 40–41, 52-53Google Scholar.
5 Wood, M. E., ‘Norman domestic architecture’, Archaeological Journal, 112 (1935), pp. 167–242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 P. A. Faulkner, art. cit.
7 Ibid., pp. 160-63.
8 Wood, M. E., The English Medieval House (London, 1965), pp. 35–66 Google Scholar.
9 Faulkner, op. cit., pp. 163–79.
10 W. J. Blair first promoted these ideas in lectures, for example in ‘Some developments in English domestic planning, 1100–1250’, a paper presented to the 13th Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain in 1984, and now published as ‘Hall and chamber: English domestic planning 1000-1250’, in Meirion-Jones, G. and Jones, M. (eds), Manorial Domestic Buildings in England and Northern France, Occasional papers of the Society of Antiquaries of London, vol. 15 (London, 1993), pp. 1–21 Google Scholar.
11 Bede, A History of the English Church and People, Book 2, chapter 13.
12 Hope-Taylor, B., Yeavering: an Anglo-British Centre of Early Northumbria (London, 1977)Google Scholar.
13 Tacitus, Germania: chapters 12–13 describe meetings of tribal councils.
14 Cramp, R., ‘ Beowulf and archaeology’, Medieval Archaeology, 1 (1957), pp. 57–77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Chaucer, , Canterbury Tales, the Nonnes Preests Tale, 12 Google Scholar.
16 West, S., ‘The Anglo-Saxon village of West Stow: an interim report on the excavations, 1965-8’, Medieval Archaeology, 13 (1969), pp. 1–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and, revised and in more detail, West Stow: the Anglo-Saxon Village, 2 vols (Ipswich, 1985).
17 Addyman, P. V., Leigh, D. and Hughes, M. J., ‘Anglo-Saxon houses at Chalton, Hants’, Medieval Archaeology, 16 (1972), pp. 13–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Addyman, P. V. and Leigh, D., ‘The Anglo-Saxon village at Chalton, Hants’, Medieval Archaeology, 17 (1973), pp. 1–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Millett, M. with James, S., ‘Excavations at Cowdery’s Down, Basingstoke, Hampshire, 1978-81’, Archaeological Journal, 140 (1983), pp. 151–279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 Rhatz, P. A., The Saxon and Medieval Palaces at Cheddar. Excavations 1960-2, British Archaeological Reports, British Series, vol. 65 (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar.
20 Biddle, M., Winchester in the Early Middle Ages (Oxford, 1976), pp. 323–28 Google Scholar; Wolvesey. The Old Bishop’s Palace, Winchester, English Heritage Guide (London, 1986).
21 Wood, ‘Norman domestic architecture’.
22 Brown, R. A., Colvin, H. M., and Taylor, A. J., The History of the King’s Works, vols 1 and 2, The Middle Ages (London, 1963), p. 5 Google Scholar.
23 Beresford, G., Goltho: the Development of an Early Medieval Manor c. 850–1150, Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission (England), Archaeological Report 4 (London, 1987)Google Scholar.
24 Blair, ‘Hall and chamber…’, p. 2.
25 Faulkner, , ‘Domestic planning…’, p. 163 Google Scholar.
26 Blair, art. cit., p. 2 et passim.
27 First reported in Nenk, B. S., Margeson, S. and Hurley, M., ‘Medieval Britain and Ireland in 1991’, Medieval Archaeology, 36 (1992), pp. 184–308, p. 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and in more detail by Harris, R., ‘The English medieval townhouse, 1100-1350’, Paper, Conference, Towns and their buildings, 1100-1650, Vernacular Architecture Group, London: 19-20 December 1998 Google Scholar.
28 Impey, E., ‘Seigneurial domestic architecture in Normandy, 1050-1350’, in Meirion-Jones, G. and Jones, M. (eds), Manorial Domestic Buildings in England and Northern France, Occasional papers of the Society of Antiquaries of London, vol. 15 (London, 1993), pp. 82–120 Google Scholar.
29 Blair, op. cit., p. 2.
30 Brown, , Colvin, and Taylor, , Kings’ Works, pp. 13–17 Google Scholar.
31 Biddle, , Winchester, pp. 289–302 Google Scholar.
32 Ullmann, W., The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages (London, 1955), pp. 87–118 Google Scholar.
33 ‘Fecit ibi et palatium, quod nominavit Lateranis’ (Ullmann, op. cit., p. 95).
34 de Bouard, M., ‘De l’ aula au donjon, les fouilles de la motte de la Chapelle à Doué-la-Fontaine (Xe-XIe siècles)’, Archéologie Médiévale, 3–4 (1973-74), pp. 5–110 Google Scholar.
35 Brown, R. A., English Castles, revised edn (London, 1976), pp. 24–25 Google Scholar.
36 Mesqui, J., Châteaux et fortifications en France (Paris, 1997), p. 220 Google Scholar. I am grateful to John Goodall for pointing out this reference to me.
37 Knight, J. K., Chepstow Castle, revised edn, Cadw guide (Cardiff, 1991), pp. 4–5, 37-39Google Scholar.
38 Stocker, D., ‘The Shadow of the General’s Armchair’, review article, Archaeological Journal, 149 (1992), pp. 415–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, is a full account of current thinking on the questions of defence, residence and symbol in casde design.
39 Gem, R. D. H., ‘Lincoln Minster: Ecclesia Pulchra, Ecclesia Fortis’, Medieval Art and Architecture at Lincoln Cathedral, British Archaeological Association Conference Transactions for 1982 (London, 1986), pp. 9–82 Google Scholar.
40 Stocker, D. A. and Vince, A., ‘The early Norman casde at Lincoln and a re-evaluation of the Original West Tower of Lincoln Cathedral’, Medieval Archaeology, 41 (1997), pp. 223–32 Google Scholar.
41 Bony, J., ‘La technique Normande du mur épais à l’époque romane’, Société Français d’Archéologie pamphlet (Paris, 1939)Google Scholar.
42 Brown, R. A. and Curnow, P., Tlie Tower of London, Department of the Environment Official Handbook (London, 1984), pp. 5–36 Google Scholar; Drury, P. J., ‘Aspects of the origins and development of Colchester Castle’, Archaeological Journal, 139 (1992), pp. 302–419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Parnell, G., ‘The White Tower: the Tower of London’, Country Life 192 (9 July 1998), pp. 86–89 Google Scholar. Some of the evidence turns on the dendro-dating of the White Tower’s gutter-boards to after 1101, and the dendro-dating of the beams of the present higher roof over the upper rooms to 1489 and 1490: see ‘Tree-ring dates from Miles, D. H. and Worthington, M. J.’, List 82, Vernacular Architecture, 28 (1997), pp. 164–67 Google Scholar. This paper is necessarily written before a symposium on the subject of the White Tower to be held in April 1999, which may resolve many of the issues outlined here.
44 Dixon, P. and Marshall, P., ‘The great tower at Hedingham Castle: a reassessment’, Fortress, 18 (1993), pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
45 Indeed, were one so minded, one could at a pinch re-interpret the White Tower as a chamber block that has lost its attendant hall, making it into a kind of urban hotel; or is its open hall to be found up-river at Westminster?
46 As Brown and Curnow, Tower of London, and Drury, ‘Colchester Castle’, propose.
47 Whittingham, A. ‘The Bishop’s Palace, Norwich’, Archaeological Journal, 137 (1980), pp. 364–68 Google Scholar, and Fernie, E., An Architectural History of Norwich Cathedral (Oxford, 1993), pp. 54–55, 89, 126-27, 134, 182-83Google Scholar. Entry from a royal palace into a chapel was repeated in the thirteenth century in Paris with the Sainte-Chapelle; notably the palace hall was one of the few to exceed that of William Rufus at Westminster and was built in 1302–13 over a high, vaulted undercroft which, as the Salle des Gens d’Armes, is still extant.
48 Peers, C., Richmond Castle, Ministry of Public Buildings and Works Official Handbook (London, 1953)Google Scholar.
49 Coad, J. G. and Streeten, A. D. F., ‘Excavations at Castle Acre Castle, Norfolk, 1972–77: Country House and Castle of the Norman Earls of Surrey’, Archaeological Journal, 139 (1982), pp. 138–301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 Raby, F. J. E. and Reynolds, P. K. Baillie, Framlingham Castle, Ministry of Public Buildings and Works Official Handbook (London, 1973)Google Scholar; Renn, D., Framlingham and Orford Castles, English Heritage Official Handbook, 3rd edn (London, 1997)Google Scholar.
51 Wood, M. E., Christchurch Castle, Ministry of Works Official Handbook (London, 1956)Google Scholar.
52 Biddle, , Winchester, pp. 323–28.Google Scholar
53 Blair, ‘Hall and chamber…’, pp. 10–11.
54 Biddle, op. cit., pp. 323-28.
55 Brown, Colvin and Taylor, Kings’ Works, p. 45.
56 Blair, art. cit., pp. 4-5.
57 Stocker, D. A., St Mary’s Guildhall, Lincoln, The Archaeology of Lincoln, vol. XII, 1 (London, 1991)Google Scholar.
58 Perring, D., Early Medieval Occupation at Flaxengate, Lincoln, The Archaeology of Lincoln, vol. IX, 1 (London, 1981), pp. 18–33 Google Scholar.
59 Jones, Flaxengate.
60 Wood, ’Norman domestic architecture’, pp. 194–98.
61 Urry, W., Canterbury under the Angevin Kings (London, 1967), pp. 119–20 Google Scholar. The London Jews stumped up £486 9s. 7d., those of Lincoln £287 4s. 11s. and those of Canterbury £235 19s. 4d., so far were they anxious for the return of their protector.
62 Jones, Flaxengate; and Stocker, Guildhall, p. 3.
63 Urry, op. cit., pp. 113, 150–52.
64 Parkin, E. W., ‘Cogan House, St Peter’s, Canterbury’, Archaeologia Cantiana, 85 (1970), pp. 123–38 Google Scholar; and Canterbury Archaeological Trust, Annual Report 1979-80Google ScholarPubMed.
65 Pitte, D., D, . and Lescroart, Y., ‘Rouen, rue Saint-Romain: découverte d’une maison médiévale en pierre (debut du XIIIe siècle), Bulletin des Amis des Monuments Rouennais (October 1990–September 1991), pp. 65–70 Google Scholar; Pitte, D., ‘La maison de pierre à Rouen (fin XI-debut XIIIe siècle): une redécouverte’: paper presented to the Table Ronde Franco-Anglaise, L’Architecture Civile des XIIe–XIIIe Siècles, Rouen, October 1998 Google Scholar.
66 Pitte, D. and Lescroart, Y., ‘Un édifice disparu, rue Malpalu, à Rouen’, Bulletin des Amis des Monuments Rouennais (October 1994-September 1995), pp. 73–83 Google Scholar.
67 Canterbury Archaeological Trust, Annual Report 1979-80Google ScholarPubMed.
68 Langland, Piers Ploughman, Script B, 10.
69 J. Grenville, , Medieval Housing (London and Washington, 1997), p. 107 Google Scholar.
70 Martin, E., ‘Little Wenham Hall: a reinterpretation’, Proceedings of the Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and History, 39.2 (1998), pp. 151-64Google Scholar.
71 F. A. Crisp, Little Wenham Hall, privately published (1911?), as quoted in Martin, above.