Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:40:26.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Law an Ass When It Comes to Mules? How Indonesia Can Lead a New Global Approach to Treating Drug Traffickers as Human Trafficked Victims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2016

Felicity GERRY QC ,
Thomas HARRÉ ,
Nathalina NAIBAHO ,
Julia MURASZKIEWICZ  and
Neil BOISTER
Felicity GERRY QC
Affiliation:
Charles Darwin University, Australiafelicity.gerry@cdu.edu.au
Thomas HARRÉ
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australiatharre@student.unimelb.edu.au
Nathalina NAIBAHO
Affiliation:
Universitas Indonesia, Indonesianathalina.naibaho@gmail.com
Julia MURASZKIEWICZ
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgiumj.muraszkiewicz@gmail.com
Neil BOISTER
Affiliation:
University of Waikato, New Zealandnboister@waikato.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Indonesia has enacted laws which provide mandatory protection for victims of human trafficking. It also has mandatory drug laws which, in some cases, lead to the death penalty. This legislative conflict together with investigative and prosecutorial failure risks the execution of human trafficked victims who are used as drug mules in organized crime. In countries where there is no statutory defence to criminal conduct, there is a need to approach criminal conduct in a way that protects victims. This includes mechanisms to ensure non-prosecution and non-punishment. The recent reprieve for Mary Jane Veloso, albeit temporary at the time of writing, is an opportunity for Indonesia to lead a new global approach to victim protection.

Type
Articles
Information
Asian Journal of International Law , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 166 - 188
Copyright
© Asian Journal of International Law 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Queen’s Counsel in London and Darwin, and Senior Lecturer, School of Law, Charles Darwin University.

†

PhD Candidate, School of Law, University of Melbourne.

‡

Universitas Indonesia.

§

PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

**

Professor of Law, Te Piringa Faculty of Law, University of Waikato, New Zealand.

References

1. The Warnath Group, “Law of the Republic of Indonesia No 21 of 2007 Human Trafficking Law” Warnath Group (2007), online: The Warnath Group <http://www.warnathgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Indonesia-TIP-Law-2007.pdf> at art. 18: “A victim who commits a crime under coercion by an offender of the criminal act of trafficking in persons shall not be liable to criminal charges.”

2. DUNLEVY, Gabrielle and COWLISHAW, Shane, “New Zealand Man Antony de Malmanche Sentenced to 15 Years Prison on Bali Drug Charge” Sydney Morning Herald (30 June 2015)Google Scholar, online: Sydney Morning Herald <http://www.smh.com.au/world/new-zealand-man-antony-de-malmanche-sentenced-to-15-years-prison-on-drug-charge-20150630-gi1ubc.html>.

3. REYNOLDS, Emma, “Saving Mary Jane: Death-row Mother’s Last-Minute Rescue was Thanks to Darwin Lawyer” News.Com.Au (7 July 2015)Google Scholar, online: News.Com.Au <http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/true-stories/saving-mary-jane-deathrow-mothers-lastminute-rescue-was-thanks-to-darwin-lawyer/news-story/77c48306a13c99b3412499fe7b8042ac>.

4. HUGHES, Ian, “Death Row Gran Lindsay Sandiford Wins Temporary Firing Squad Reprieve as Indonesia Halts Executions” Mirror.Co.Uk (20 November 2015)Google Scholar, online: Mirror.Co.Uk <http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/death-row-gran-lindsay-sandiford-6865839>.

5. HAWLEY, Samantha, “Wilfrida Soik: Indonesian Government Saves Maid from Death Row in Malaysia, After Sending Bali Nine Pair to Deaths” ABC.Net.Au Google Scholar (26 August 2015, online: ABC.Net.Au <http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-26/indonesian-maid-escapes-death-sentence-in-malaysia/6726012>.

6. Rev. Ed. 1980.

7. See e.g. the above-mentioned duty in the UK to protect trafficked victims which arises from s. 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 which creates a defence for slavery or trafficking victims who commit an offence; the EU’s Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support, and protection of victims of crime; and the EU’s Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings.

8. 15 November 2000, 2237 U.N.T.S. 319 (entered into force 25 December 2003) [Trafficking Protocol].

9. Ibid., at preambular para. 1, which calls for a “comprehensive approach” by states to protect the victims of trafficking.

10. Ibid., at art. 3.

11. Trafficking in Organs, Tissues and Cells and Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of the Removal of Organs, Joint Council of Europe / UN Study (2009), at 78.

12. GALLAGHER, Anne, The International Law of Human Trafficking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010) at 29–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [UNODC], “Anti-Human Trafficking Manual for Criminal Justice Practitioners” (2009), online: UNODC <http://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/TIP_module4_Ebook.pdf> at 4.

14. Ibid., at 5.

15. Ibid., at 8.

16. United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], “Interpretative Notes for the Official Records (Travaux Préparatoires) of the Negotiation of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto” (3 November 2000), online: UNGA <https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/final_instruments/383a1e.pdf> at 12.

17. UNODC, “Issue Paper: Abuse of a Position of Vulnerability and other ‘Means’ Within the Definition of Trafficking in Persons” (2013), online: UNODC <https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/2012/UNODC_2012_Issue_Paper_-_Abuse_of_a_Position_of_Vulnerability.pdf> at 2.

18. Ibid., at 3.

19. Trafficking Protocol, supra note 8 at art. 3.

20. UNODC, “Anti-Trafficking Practitioners’ Manual: Module 1” (2009), online: UNODC <https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/TIP_module1_Ebook.pdf> at 4. UNODC further notes that domestic law could enable mens rea to be established on a lesser standard than direct “intent” (such as recklessness, wilful blindness, or criminal negligence).

21. Gallagher, supra note 12 at 34.

22. See e.g. International Agreement for the Suppression of the White Slave Traffic, 18 May 1904, 35 Stat. 1979, 1 L.N.T.S. 83 (entered into force 18 July 1905).

23. UNODC, “Transnational Organized Crime in East Asia and the Pacific: A Threat Assessment” (2013), online: UNODC <http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/TOCTA_EAP_web.pdf> at 139.

24. PARLINA, Ina, “Rehab Better than the Can for Drug Users” Jakarta Post (12 March 2014), online: Jakarta Post <http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/03/12/rehab-better-can-drug-users.html>>Google Scholar.

25. SBS.Com.Au, “SBS Report 25th April 2015” SBS.Com.Au (25 April 2015), online: SBS.Com.Au <http://www.sbs.com.au/news/storystream/bishop-fears-worst-chan-sukumaran-meeting-called>.

26. Hawley, supra note 5.

27. CHUANG, Janie A., “Exploitation Creep and the Unmaking of Human Trafficking Law” (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 609 at 616 Google Scholar.

28. For a good analysis, see GALLAGHER, Anne, “Recent Legal Developments in the Field of Human Trafficking: A Critical Review of the 2005 European Convention and Related Instruments” (2006) 8 European Journal of Migration and Law 163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings, 16 May 2005, C.E.T.S. No. 197 (entered into force 1 February 2008), at art. 26.

30. European Union Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and Protecting its Victims, and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA, 5 April 2011, EU Directive 2011/36/EU at art. 8.

31. ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, 21 November 2015, at art. 14(7), which states: “Each Party shall, subject to its domestic laws, rules, regulations and policies, and in appropriate cases, consider not holding victims of trafficking in persons criminally or administratively liable, for unlawful acts committed by them, if such acts are directly related to the acts of trafficking.”

32. Principle 7, UN Trafficking Principles and Guidelines, online: <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Traffickingen.pdf>

33. See e.g. Trafficking in Women and Girls, UN Doc A/RES/63/156 (2009), at [12]; Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/11/3 (2009), at [3(e)].

34. ILO Forced Labour Protocol 2014, online: <http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_246549/lang--en/index.htm>.

35. Gallagher, supra note 12 at 288.

36. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [OSCE], “Policy and Legislative Recommendations Towards the Effective Implementation of the Non-Punishment Provision with regard to Victims of Trafficking” (2013), online: OSCE <http://www.osce.org/secretariat/101002?download=true>.

37. HOSHI, Bijan, “The Trafficking Defence: A Proposed Model for the Non-Criminalisation of Trafficked Persons in International Law” (2013) 1 Groningen Journal of International Law 54 Google Scholar.

38. WILSON, Laura and STEVENS, Alex, “Understanding Drug Markets and How to Influence Them”, The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, Report Fourteen, at 1 Google Scholar.

39. CAULKINS, J.P., BURNETT, H., and LESLIE, E., “How Illegal Drugs Enter an Island Country: Insights From Interviews with Incarcerated Traffickers” (2009) 10 Global Crime 66 at 69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40. Ibid., at 68.

41. See e.g. WILLIAMS, Phil, “Nigerian Criminal Organisations” in Paolo LETIZIA (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Organized Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 254 Google Scholar at 255.

42. Caulkins et al., supra note 39 at 69.

43. ZHANG, Sheldon X. and CHIN, Ko-lin, “Snakeheads, Mules, and Protective Umbrellas: A Review of Current Research on Chinese Organized Crime” (2008) 50 Crime Law and Social Change 177 at 191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. Wilson and Stevens, supra note 38 at 3.

45. Ibid., at 1, 5.

46. FLEETWOOD, Jennifer, “Five Kilos: Penalties and Practice in the International Cocaine Trade” (2011) 51 British Journal of Criminology 375 at 376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 382; HARRIS, Genevieve, “Law Reform Without Legislative Reform: Sentencing of Drug Offences in England and Wales”, Transnational Institute/International Drug Policy Consortium, Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies, No. 5 (June 2010), at 4 Google Scholar.

47. Fleetwood, ibid., at 382.

48. Ibid., at 384.

49. UK Sentencing Council, Drug “Mules”: Twelve Case Studies, Office of the Sentencing Council (March 2011), at 4.

50. Fleetwood, supra note 46 at 382.

51. Ibid., at 381 and the sources cited there; UK Sentencing Council, supra note 49 at 3.

52. UK Sentencing Council, supra note 49 at 5; Wilson and Stevens, supra note 38 at 5.

53. Fleetwood, supra note 46 at 384.

54. Ibid.

55. Ibid., at 387.

56. Caulkins et al., supra note 39 at 72.

57. Wilson and Stevens, supra note 38 at 7–8.

58. HULING, Tracy, “Women Drug Couriers: Sentencing Reform Needed for Prisoners of War” (1995) 9 Criminal Justice 15 at 61 Google Scholar, and sources cited there.

59. Fleetwood, supra note 46 at 377, and sources cited there; Huling, ibid., at 17, and sources cited there.

60. Fleetwood, supra note 46 at 388.

61. Advice to the Sentencing Guidelines Council: Sentencing Drug Offences, UK Sentencing Advisory Panel (2010), at 21–2; Caulkins et al., supra note 9 at 90.

62. Promoting International Cooperation in Addressing the Involvement of Women and Girls in Drug Trafficking, Especially as Couriers, UNODC Res. 52/1 (2009).

63. Huling, supra note 58 at 16.

64. GRAHAM, Marty, “Mexican Cartels Trick Border Crossers into Being Drug Mules” Reuters (15 April 2012)Google Scholar, online: Reuters <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-mexico-drugs-idUSBRE83E0IY20120415>.

65. SHEARS, Richard, “From Lonely Heart to Jailed Drug Mule: British Woman Forced to Smuggle Heroin for Internet Lover” Daily Mail Online (2 March 2009)Google Scholar, online: Daily Mail Online <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1158292/From-lonely-heart-jailed-drug-mule-British-woman-forced-smuggle-heroin-internet-lover.html>.

66. OGRODNIK, Irene, “Elderly Australian Couple Used as Drug Mules in Canadian Holiday Ticket Scam” Global News Canada (25 October 2013)Google Scholar, online: Global News Canada <http://globalnews.ca/news/925185/canadian-arrested-after-elderly-australian-couple-used-as-drug-mules-in-holiday-ticket-scam/>.

67. UK Sentencing Council, supra note 49 at 6.

68. Harris, supra note 46 at 4.

69. Informe Sobre el Sistema de Rehabilitación Social, Republic of Ecuador Montecristi (Constitutional Assembly) Report (3 April 2008).

70. Crime, Violence and Development: Trends, Costs and Policy Options in the Caribbean, UNODC Report No. 37820 (March 2007), at 97, para. 7.14.

71. GREEN, Penny, Drugs, Trafficking and Criminal Policy: The Scapegoat Strategy (Winchester: Waterside Press, 1998) at 9 Google Scholar.

72. R v. Kouadio, The Times, 21 February 1991, per Write J, cited in Genevieve HARRIS, Law Reform Without Legislative Reform: Sentencing for Drug Offences in England and Wales, Transnational Institute/IDPC, June 2010, Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies No. 5, at 4.

73. Huling, supra note 58 at 15.

74. See e.g. Attorney General’s Reference No.14 of 2001 (Maria Das Dores Fietose) [2003] 1 Cr. App. R (S) 17.

75. Huling, supra note 58 at 19.

76. Ibid.

77. Rantsev v. Cyprus & Russia, European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR] Application No. 25965/04 (Strasbourg, 7 January 2010); and Case of M. & Others v. Italy And Bulgaria, ECtHR Application No. 40020/03 (31 July 2012).

78. International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171, 6 I.L.M. 368 (entered into force 23 March 1976) [ICCPR].

79. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force 3 January 1976) [ICESCR].

80. Cornell Law School Death Penalty database, online: <https://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/country-search-post.cfm?country=Indonesia>.

81. Statement by the Indonesian delegation to the 57th Session of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs, online: <https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND/CND_Sessions/CND_57/HLS/Statements/Thurs_13th_AM/20_Indonesia_130314_am.pdf>.

82. R (on the application of Sandiford) v. The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] U.K.S.C. 44.

83. The Eradication of the Criminal Act of Trafficking in Persons, Law of the Republic of Indonesia No 21 of 2007, online: <http://www.warnathgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Indonesia-TIP-Law-2007.pdf>.

84. Ibid., art. 18.

85. Ibid., art. 1.

86. Buku Putih Pertahanan Negara 2008: Mempertahankan Tanah Air Memasuki Abad 21 [Indonesian Defense White Paper: Defending the Nation Entering the Twenty-first Century], White Paper published by the Indonesian Defense Department (2008), online: <http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/06/16/reviewing-indonesia-s-new-defense-white-paper.html>.

87. Pengarahan Presiden Republik Indonesia Pada Acara Menerima Para Peserta Rapim TNI dan Rakor POLRI Istana Negara, Ministry of Communication and Information Indonesia (MENKOMINFO) (29 January 2009), at 116.

88. Ibid., ftn 88.

89. Authors’ translation.

90. NAIBAHO, Nathalina, “Human Trafficking in Indonesia: Law Enforcement Problems” (2011) 1 Indonesian Law Review 83 at 91 Google Scholar.

91. Ibid., at 92–3.

92. Ibid., at 94.

93. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 30 March 1961, 520 U.N.T.S. 151 (entered into force 13 December 1964), at art. 36(1); Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 21 February 1971, 1019 U.N.T.S. 175 (entered into force 16 August 1976), at art. 22; and United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1582 U.N.T.S. 95 (entered into force 11 November 1990), at art. 3.

94. See e.g. art. 122-5 of Law No. 5 of 1997, with regard to Group III drugs.

95. [2013] EWCA Crim 991, at [1].

96. See United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [UNHCR], “Conference Puts Focus on Human Trafficking, Fastest Growing Criminal Industry” UNHCR Press Release (11 October 2010), online: UNHCR <http://www.unhcr.org/4cb315c96.html>.

97. UNODC, “Drug Mules: Swallowed by the Illicit Trade” UNODC, online: UNODC <http://www.unodc.org/southasia/en/frontpage/2012/october/drug-mules_-swallowed-by-the-illicit-drug-trade.html>.

98. Gallagher, supra note 12 at 288.