Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:30:15.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Additive Premium Calculation Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Hans U. Gerber
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A premium calculation principle is a general rule that assigns a premium P to any given risk S. Intuitively, P is what the insurance carrier charges (apart from an expense allowance) for taking over the risk S (see [3], p. 85-87). Mathematically, S is a random variable, and P depends on S through its distribution function. The value of P may be finite or infinite; in the latter case we speak of an uninsurable risk.

A premium calculation principle is called additive, if the premium assigned to the sum of two independent risks is the sum of the premiums that are assigned to the two risks individually. For example, the variance principle, P = E[S] + β Var [S] (β > o), is additive, because the variance of the sum of independent random variables equals the sum of the variances. Additivity is a very desirable property, from a theoretical as well as from a practical point of view (as pointed out by Borch [2], p. 429).

The variance principle is not entirely satisfactory for various reasons. For one thing it does not take account of the skewness of S (a risk whose distribution is skewed to the right seems to be more dangerous than one with a symmetrical distribution). Furthermore, it produces in some cases a premium P that exceeds S with probability one (example: β = .3, S = o or 10, each with probability 1/2).

Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , March 1974 , pp. 215 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1974

References

[1]Beard, R., Pentikainen, T., Pesonen, E., Risk Theory, Methuen, London, 1969.Google Scholar
[2]Borch, K., “Equilibrium in a reinsurance market”, Econometrica 30 (1962), 424–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Buhlmann, H., Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory, Springer, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
[4]Bühlmann, H., “Individual, cooperative and competitive pricing of risks” Risk and uncertainty (Conference IE A, Smolenice) ed. by Borch, K. and Mossin, J.Macmillan, London, 1968, p. 265–282.Google Scholar
[5]Dumouchel, W., “The Pareto-optimality of a n-company reinsurance treaty” Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 51 (1968), 165–170.Google Scholar
[6]de Ferra, C., “Considerazioni sulle funzioni di utilità in connessione con la teoria del rischio”. Giornale dell' Istituto Italiano degli Attuari 27 (1964), 51–70.Google Scholar
[7]Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1968.Google Scholar