Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:29:17.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transition Planning Processes for Young People Serving Custodial Sentences in New South Wales, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2018

Therese M. Cumming ,
Iva Strnadová  and
Sue C. O'Neill
Therese M. Cumming*
Affiliation:
UNSW Australia
Iva Strnadová
Affiliation:
UNSW Australia
Sue C. O'Neill
Affiliation:
UNSW Australia
*
Correspondence: Therese M. Cumming, School of Education, Special and Inclusive Education Research Group, John Goodsell Building, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: t.cumming@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify transition planning processes as reported by participants for school-aged youth serving custodial sentences in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and to establish the extent to which these reflect current evidence or research-based transition practices reported in the literature. The authors used inductive content analysis methodology to analyse interviews with 44 staff members from the education and juvenile justice systems in NSW. The findings of the study indicate that although a number of evidence/research-based practices are being used, there are some that still need to be implemented. Specifically, there is a need for more involvement of the families of incarcerated youth and support for the self-determination of the young people in custody.

Keywords

incarcerated youthtransition to communitytransition planning processesTaxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , December 2018 , pp. 93 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Umesh Sharma.

References

Anthony, E. K., Samples, M. D., de Kervor, D. N., Ituarte, S., Lee, C., & Austin, M. J. (2010). Coming back home: The reintegration of formerly incarcerated youth with service implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1271–1277. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.018Google Scholar
Baer, R. M., & Flexer, R. W. (2013). A framework for positive outcomes. In Flexer, R.W., Baer, R. M., Luft, P., & Simmons, T. J. (Eds.), Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (4th ed., pp. 3–21). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Barton, W. H., Mackin, J. R., & Fields, J. (2008). Assessing youth strengths in a residential juvenile correctional program. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 23 (3–4), 11–36. doi:10.1080/08865710609512715Google Scholar
Bertram, R. M., Suter, J. C., Bruns, E. J., & O'Rourke, K. E. (2011). Implementation research and wraparound literature: Building a research agenda. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 713–725. doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9430-3Google Scholar
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205Google Scholar
Brock, L., O'Cummings, M., & Milligan, D. (2008). Transition Toolkit 2.0: Meeting the educational needs of youth exposed to the juvenile justice system. Washington, DC: National Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk (NDTAC). Retrieved from http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/resources/toolkits/transition_200808.aspGoogle Scholar
Burke, J. D., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., & Garbin, S. R. (2014). The challenge and opportunity of parental involvement in juvenile justice services. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.007Google Scholar
Dawes, G. D. (2011). The challenges of reintegrating Indigenous youth after their release from detention. Journal of Youth Studies, 14, 693–707. doi:10.1080/13676261.2011.580338Google Scholar
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.xGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, J. C., Barber, B. R., Van Loan, C., & Leone, P. E. (2009). Juvenile correctional schools: Characteristics and approaches to curriculum. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 673–696. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0068Google Scholar
Garfinkel, L. (2010). Improving family involvement for juvenile offenders with emotional/behavioral disorders and related disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 52–60.Google Scholar
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001Google Scholar
Griller Clark, H., & Unruh, D. (2010). Transition practices for adjudicated youth with E/BDs and related disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 43–51.Google Scholar
Hagner, D., Malloy, J. M., Mazzone, M. W., & Cormier, G. M. (2008). Youth with disabilities in the criminal justice system: Considerations for transition and rehabilitation planning. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 240–247. doi:10.1177/1063426608316019Google Scholar
Halsey, M. (2007). Assembling recidivism: The promise and contingencies of post-release life. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 1209–1260.Google Scholar
Hirschfield, P. J. (2014). Effective and promising practices in transitional planning and school reentry. The Journal of Correctional Education, 65, 84–96.Google Scholar
Hogan, K. A., Bullock, L. M., & Fritsch, E. J. (2010). Meeting the transition needs of incarcerated youth with disabilities. The Journal of Correctional Education, 61, 133–147.Google Scholar
Jarvis, L. A., Beale, B., & Martin, K. (2000). A client-centred model: Discharge planning in juvenile justice centres in New South Wales, Australia. International Nursing Review, 47, 184–190. doi:10.1046/j.1466-7657.2000.00026.xGoogle Scholar
Kapp, S. A., Petr, C. G., Robbins, M. L., & Choi, J. J. (2013). Collaboration between community mental health and juvenile justice systems: Barriers and facilitators. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 30, 505–517. doi:10.1007/s10560-013-0300-xGoogle Scholar
Kohler, P. D., Gothberg, J. E., Fowler, C., & Coyle, J. (2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University. Retrieved from http://www.transitionta.orgGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124–147. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573Google Scholar
Martinez, D. J., & Abrams, L. S. (2013). Informal social support among returning young offenders: A metaysnthesis of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 169–190. doi:10.1177/0306624X11428203Google Scholar
Mathur, S. R., & Griller Clark, H. (2013). Prerelease planning and practices for youth with disabilities in juvenile detention. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 26, 82–92.Google Scholar
Mendes, P., Snow, P., & Baidawi, S. (2014). The views of service providers on the challenges facing young people also involved in the youth justice system transitioning from out-of-home care. Journal of Policy Practice, 13, 239–257. doi:10.1080/15588742.2014.929074Google Scholar
Nelson, C. M., Leone, P. E., & Rutherford, R. B. Jr. (2004). Youth delinquency: Prevention and intervention. In Rutherford, R. B. Jr., Quinn, M. M., & Mathur, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 282–301). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ochoa, T. A. (2016). Improving transition support for juvenile offenders with disabilities through a collaborative approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 44–50. doi:10.1177/1053451216630291Google Scholar
Payne, J. (2007). Recidivism in Australia: Findings and future research (Research and Public Policy Series No. 80). Retrieved from http://aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp80Google Scholar
Risler, E., & O'Rourke, T. (2009). Thinking exit at entry: Exploring outcomes of Georgia's juvenile justice educational programs. The Journal of Correctional Education, 60, 225–239.Google Scholar
Shufelt, J. L., Cocozza, J. J., & Skowyra, K. R. (2010). Successfully collaborating with the juvenile justice system: Benefits, challenges, and key strategies. Washington, DC: Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health.Google Scholar
Walker, J. S. (2008). How, and why, does wraparound work: A theory of change. In Bruns, E. J. & Walker, J. S. (Eds.), The resource guide to wraparound. Retrieved from https://nwi.pdx.edu/NWI-book/Chapters/Walker-3.1-(theory-of-change).pdfGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522–537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299Google Scholar