Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:24:01.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curricular Skills Valued by Parents of Children Attending Special Developmental Schools in Victoria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Helena Skora ,
Bob Pillay  and
Ishwar Desai
Helena Skora*
Affiliation:
Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria
Bob Pillay
Affiliation:
The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Ishwar Desai
Affiliation:
The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
Address for: Helena Skora, C/- A. Pillay, Department of Learning and Education Development, University of Melbourne, Victoria. 3010. Email: b.pillay@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The need for parental involvement in developing effective programs for children with disabilities is highlighted in the conceptual and research literature as well as in the legislation and policies of a number of countries. The present study was undertaken to investigate the curricular skills valued by parents of children with moderate to severe/profound intellectual disabilities attending Special Developmental Schools in Victoria, Australia. The study examined whether a significant relationship existed between selected background factors and the value parents placed on particular curricular skills. In addition, the study attempted to identify the percentage of a typical school week that parents felt should be spent on particular skills within the educational programs offered to their children.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 25 , Issue 1-2 , 2001 , pp. 4 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgart, D., Brown, L., Pumpian, I., Nisbet, J., Ford, A., Sweet, M., Messina, R., & Schroeder, J. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualised adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(2), 17–27.Google Scholar
Browder, D. & Snell, M. (1993). Functional academics. In Snell, M. E. (Ed.). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (4th ed.) (pp. 442–479). New York: Merrill/ Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Branston, M., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N. & Gruenwald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 13, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Falvey, M., Vincent, L., Kaye, N., Johnson, F., Ferrara-Parish, P., & Gruenwald, L. (1980). Strategies for generating comprehensive, longitudinal and chronological-age-appropriate individualised educational programs for adolescents and young-adult severely handicapped students. Journal of Special Education, 14, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1976). The criterion for ultimate functioning. In Thomas, M.A. (Ed.), Hey, don’t forget about me! Education’s investment in the severely, profoundly and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
Collins, M. (Chair). (1984). Integration in Victorian Education: Report of the Ministerial Review of Educational Services for the Disabled, Melbourne: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. (1984). Essentials of Pyschological Testing (4th ed.), New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
D’Amato, E., & Yoshida, R. (1991). Parental needs: an educational life cycle perspective, Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria (2000). Program Support Group Guidelines for Students with Disabilities and Impairments. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Directorate of Education, Victoria (1993). Report of the Cullen Brown Implementation Advisory Committee. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Epps, S., & Myers, C. (1989). Priority domains for instruction, satisfaction with school teaching, post school living and employment: an analysis of perceptions of parents of students with severe and profound disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 157–167.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. (1992). School and Family Partnerships. Report No.6 Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children’s Learning, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
The Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Public Law 94-142 (1975) 20 U.S.C. 1412.Google Scholar
Falvey, M. (1989). Community-based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe handicaps (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hamlin-Wilson, C., & Thurman, S. (1990). The transition from early intervention to kindergarten: parental satisfaction and involvement. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 55–61.Google Scholar
Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1993). How much time should be spent on skill instruction and friendship development? preferences of parents of students with moderate and severe/profound disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 288(5), 220–231.Google Scholar
Hamre-Nietupski, S., Nietupski, J., & Strathe, M., (1992). Functional life skills, academic skills and friendship/social relationship development: what do parents of students with moderate/severe/profound disabilities value? The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 17(1), 53–58.Google Scholar
Kirk, A., Gallagher, J., & Anastasiow, J. (1997). Educating Exceptional Children (8th ed.). Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kroth, R., & Edge, D. (1997). Strategies for Communicating with Parents and Families of Exceptional Children, (3rd ed.), Denver, Colorado: Love.Google Scholar
Meyers, C., & Blacher, J. (1987). Parents’ perceptions of schooling for severely handicapped children: Home and family variables. Exceptional Children, 53, 441–449.Google Scholar
Pell, E., & Cohen, E. (1995). Parents and Advocacy Systems: A Family System Approach. In Wang, M.C., Reynolds, M.C. & Walberg, H.J. (Eds.). Handbook of special and remedial education: Research and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Pickering, D., & Dickens, E. (1992). Special Schools: Students, parents and teachers. Burwood Australia: Victoria College Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, C., & Evans, J. (1988). Comparison of parental involvement in regular and special education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 13(4), 268–272.Google Scholar
Simeonsson, R., & Bailey, D. (1990). Family dimensions in early intervention. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (pp. 428-444). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, R., & Sasso, G. (1992). Full inclusion of students with autism in general education settings: Values versus science. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 7, 1–13 Google Scholar
Turnbull, A., & Turnbull, H. (1997). Families, Professionals and Exceptionality: A special partnership (3rd ed.). Denver Love.Google Scholar
Warnock, H. (1978). Special education needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the education of handicapped children and young people. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Westling, D., & Fox, L. (1995). Teaching persons with severe disabilities. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Merrill.Google Scholar
White, K., Taylor, M., & Moss, V.D. (1992). Does research support claims about the benefits of involving parents in early intervention programs? Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 91–125.Google Scholar
Williams, W., Fox, T., Thousand, J., & Fox, W. (1990). Level of acceptance of best practices in the education of students with severe handicaps in Vermont. Education and Training In Mental Retardation, 25(2), 120–131.Google Scholar
Yanok, J., & Derubertis, D. (1989). Comparative study of parental participation in Regular and special education programs. Exceptional Children, 56, 198–199.Google Scholar