Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:24:19.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structuring the Classroom for Success

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Colleen S. Blankenship
Colleen S. Blankenship*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article summarizes recent research on effective classroom management practices that teachers can use to enhance learning and to prevent, or at least minimize, the occurrence of misbehaviour. Suggestions for creating and maintaining an appropriate climate for learning are discussed. Strategies that are particularly effective in teaching mildly handicapped students are emphasized and procedures for evaluating the effectiveness of one’s management practices are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 1988 , pp. 25 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (1986). Applied behavior analysis for teachers: Influencing student performance (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Bain, L.L., & Wendt, J.C. (1983). Transition to teaching: A guide for the beginning teacher. Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance.Google Scholar
Behnke, G.J. (1979). Coping with classroom distractions: The formal research study (Rep. IR & DT 79–2). San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.Google Scholar
Blankenship, C.S. (1985a). Individualizing instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems. In Cawley, J. (Ed.), Secondary school mathematics f or the learning disabled (pp. 61–82). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.Google Scholar
Blankenship, C.S. (1985b). Linking assessment, curriculum, and instruction. In Cawley, J. (Ed.), Practical mathematics appraisal of the learning disabled (pp. 59–79). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.Google Scholar
Blankenship, C.S. (1985c). Using curriculum-based assessment to make instructional decisions. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 233–238.Google Scholar
Blankenship, C.S. (1986). Managing pupil behaviors during instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 19(1), 52–53.Google Scholar
Blankenship, C.S., & Lilly, M.S. (1981). Mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems: Techniques for the classroom teacher. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Brophy, J., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), pp. 328–375. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Charles, C.M., & Milian, I.M. (1980). The special student: Practical help for the classroom teacher. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In Wittrock, M.C (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), pp. 392–431. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Evertson, C.M., Emmer, E.T., Clements, B.S., Sanford, J.P., & Worsham, M.E. (1984), Classroom management for elementary teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. Berliner, D., Filby, N.. Marliave, R., Cahen, L., & Dishaw, M. (1980). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In Denham, C. & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). Time to learn (pp. 7–32). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L., Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 449–460.Google Scholar
Gickling, E.E., & Thompson, V.P. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional children, 52(3), 205–218.Google Scholar
Haring, N.G., Lovitt, T.C., Eaton, M.D., & Hansen, C.L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Idol-Maestas, L., Nevin, A., & Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. (1986). Practices in curriculum-based assessment. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.Google Scholar
Kounin, J.S. (1983). Classrooms: Individuals or behavior settings? Monographs in Teaching and Learning, No.1. Bloomington: Indiana University, School of Education.Google Scholar
Lovitt, T.C., & Hansen, C.L. (1976). Round one-placing the child in the right reader. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9(6), 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partin, R. (1987). Minimizing classroom interruptions. The Clearing House, 61(1), 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risley, T. (1972). Spontaneous language and the preschool. In Stanley, J.C. (Ed.), Preschool programs for the disadvantaged: Five experimental approaches to early childhood education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B., & Stephens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), pp. 376–391. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sanford, J.P., Emmer, E.T., & Clements, B.S. (1983). Improving classroom management. Educational Leadership, 40(7), 56–60.Google Scholar
Smith, D.D. (1989). Teaching students with learning and behavior problems, (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., & Froyen, L. (1987). Structuring the classroom to prevent disruptive behaviors. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20(4), 12–16.Google Scholar
Weber, W.A., Roff, L.A., Crawford, J., & Robinson, C. (1983). Classroom management: Reviews of the teacher education and research literature. Princeton, NJ.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar