Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:29:20.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Students Direct Inclusive School Development in an Australian Secondary School: An Example of Student Empowerment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Suzanne Carrington  and
Kris Holm
Suzanne Carrington*
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology
Kris Holm
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology
*
Dr. Suzanne Carhngton. School of Learning and Professional Studies, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove 4059 Queensland Australia. Email: sx.carrington@qut.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper reports on processes employed at a secondary state high school in Australia, where students directed inclusive school development. The procedures used in the study were developed from the Index for Inclusion and included a student forum; a student presentation to parents, principal and teachers and a focus group interview with members of the school community. These procedures were designed to empower students to participate in school review and planning and evaluate the procedures developed from the Index for Inclusion. Samples of interview data from the school principal, staff, parents and the students illustrate a growing understanding of what inclusive education means for members of this school community. The research extends understandings of inclusive education in schools, from a focus on students with disabilities to a much broader philosophy that influences school culture, policy and practice for the diversity of students at the school. Discussion about feeling part of a ‘family’ in the school community and the description of the procedures linked to actions for change, provide evidence of a developing inclusive school culture that will inform educators interested in inclusive school development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , 2005 , pp. 155 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apple, M. W., & Beane, J. A. (1995). Democratic schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Ashman, A., & Elkins, J. (Eds.). (1998). Educating children with special needs (3rd ed.) Sydney: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Barton, L. (1997). Inclusive education: Romantic, subversive or realistic? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughan, M., & Shaw, L. (2000). Index for inclusion. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.Google Scholar
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, S. (1999). Inclusion needs a different school culture. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, S., Allen, , & Osmolowski, (2005). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Carrington, S., & Robinson, R. (2004). A case study of inclusive school development: A journey of learning. The International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, S., & Robinson, R. (in press). Inclusive School Community: Why is it so complex? The International Journal of Inclusive Education. Google Scholar
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. London: Sage. Collins English Dictionary. (1991). Sydney: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Crebbin, W. (2004). Quality teaching and learning. Challenging orthodoxies. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Education Queensland. (2002). School Improvement and Accountability Framework. Managing Triennial School Reviews 2002-2005. Retrieved March 22, 2005 from http://education.qld.gov.au/strategic/accountability/performance/siaf-index.html Google Scholar
Fielding, M. (2001) Beyond the rhetoric of student voice: new departures or new constraints in the transformation of 21st century schooling? Forum, 43, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D., Sax, C., Rodifer, K., & Pumpian, I. (1999). Teachers’ perspectives of curriculum and climate changes: benefits of inclusive education. Journal for a Just and Caring Education 5 (3), 256–68.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Edited by Gordon, C., New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Freiberg, H. J. (1996). From tourists to citizens in the classroom. Educational Leadership, 54(1), 32–36.Google Scholar
Freiré, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Hagerstown, MN: Harper and Row Google Scholar
Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gore, J. (1997). On the use of empirical research for the development of a theory of pedagogy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 27, 211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, M. (Ed) (2003). Action for social justice in education. Fairly different. Philadelphia, Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kugelmass, J. (2004, June). What is a culture of inclusion? EENET-Enabling Education, 8, p.20. Retreived from http://www.eenet.org.uk/newsletters/news8/eenetnews8.pdf Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1994). Educational reform and the treatment of students in schools, Journal of Educational Thought, 28, 89–101.Google Scholar
Maher, F. A., & Teteault, M. K. T. (1994). The feminist classroom. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Mallory, B., & New, R. (1994). Social constructivist theory and principles of inclusion: challenges for early childhood special education. Journal of Special Education, 28, 322–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, J. (2003). Inclusive schooling policy: An educational detective story. Australian Educational Researcher, 30, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, L. (2001). Student involvement in school improvement: From data source to significant voice. Forum, 43, 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, V. (1991). Special education: New questions in an era of reform. The State Board Connection, 11(6), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Robinson, R., & Carrington, S. (2002). Professional development for inclusive schooling. The International Journal of Educational Managements 6, 239–247.Google Scholar
Reason, P. (1998). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In Denzin, K.. & Lincoln, Y. S., (Eds.). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Silva, E. (2001) Squeaky wheels and flat tyres: A case study of students as reform participants. Forum 43, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrtic, T. M., Sailor, W., & Gee, K. (1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, R. (1994). Finding a student voice in school reform: Student disaffection, pathologies of disruption and educational control. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 4, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, R. (2003) Valuing diversity and inclusiveness: The DDG speaks out on inclusive education. Education Views, August 22, 2003.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1998). Crossing borders: learning from inclusion and restructuring research in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and the United States. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 161–166.Google Scholar
SooHoo, S. (1993). Students as partners in research and restructuring schools, Educational Reform, 57, 386–393.Google Scholar
Turner, C. S. V., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Society’s response to differences. A sociological perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar