Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:45:58.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Everyday Environmental Education Experiences: The Role of Content in Early Childhood Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Amy Cutter-Mackenzie  and
Suzy Edwards
Amy Cutter-Mackenzie*
Affiliation:
Monash University
Suzy Edwards
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
†Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. Email: Amy.CutterMackenzie@Education.monash.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years discussions surrounding early childhood curriculum has focused on the movement from developmental to sociocultural theory. A further area worthy of investigation involves the role of content in early childhood education, specifically the relationship between content, context and pedagogy. The paper draws on teacher vignettes to consider how environmental education can be represented as a content area in early years education. Issues associated with environmental education as an emerging area of importance in early childhood education are also discussed.

Keywords

Environmental EducationEarly Childhood EducationKnowledgeContent and Everyday Experience
Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , 2006 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003 

References

Australian State of the Environment Committee. (2001). State of the Environment. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Revised edition. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2003). Eco-literacy: The “missing paradigm” in environmental education. Unpublished PhD, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton.Google Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2006, in press). Knowledge Matters: Teaching Environmental Education in the Early Years. In Fleer, M. & Robbins, J. (Eds.), Early Childhood Science. Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.Google Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological Literacy: The “Missing” Paradigm in Environmental Education (Part One). Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 497–524.Google Scholar
Davis, J., & Elliott, S. (2003). Early childhood environmental education: Making it mainstream. Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. (2003). New directions: Charting the paths for the role of sociocultural theory in early childhood education and curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(3), 251–266.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. (2005). Constructivism doesn’t only happen in the individual: sociocultural theory and early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 175(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
Fleer, M. (2002) Socio-cultural theory: rebuilding the theoretical foundations of early childhood education. Policy and Practice in Education. Early Education: Policy, curriculum and discourse, 54(1&2), 105–121.Google Scholar
Fleer, M. (2003). Where do we put our research efforts? An investigation of the perceived research needs of Australian Early Childhood Professionals. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(1), 12–37.Google Scholar
Fleer, M. (2006). Potentive assessment in early childhood education. In Fleer, M., Edwards, S.., Hammer, M., Kennedy, A., Ridgway, A., Robbins, J. & Surman, L.. Early childhood learning communities. Sociocultural research in practice (pp. 161–174). Pearson: Frenchs Forest, NSW.Google Scholar
Hedges, H., & Cullen, J. (2005). Subject knowledge in early childhood curriculum and pedagogy: beliefs and practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 66–79.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (2004). Scaffolding learning and co-constructing understandings. In Anning, A., Cullen, J. & Fleer, M. (Eds.), Early childhood education (pp 31–43). Society and culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. (2003). Settings standards in early childhood education. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 64–68 Google Scholar
Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Pre-school teachers' content knowledge in science: Their understandings of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children's questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165–179.Google Scholar
Millennium EcoSystem Assessment Board. (2005). Living beyond our means: Natural assets and human well-being. Retrieved from http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Products.aspx Google Scholar
Monash City Council. (2005). Waste management - questions and answers. Retrieved January 18, 2006, from http://www.monash.vic.gov.au/services/waste-answers.html Google Scholar
Robbins, J. (2005). Contexts, collaboration and cultural tools: A sociocultural perspective on researching children's thinking. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(2), 140–149.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (1977). Trends in environmental education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2002). Education for sustainability, from Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons learnt from a decade of commitment (Report). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2004). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development 2005–2014. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO-UNEP. (1978). The Tbilisi Declaration. Connect, 3(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
UNESCO-UNEP. (1992). UNCED: The Earth Summit. Connect, 17(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Wood, E. (2004). Developing a pedagogy of play. In Anning, A., Cullen, J. & Fleer, M. (Eds.), Early childhood education. Society and culture (pp. 19–31). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar