Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:37:56.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A physical education/environmental education nexus: Transdisciplinary approaches to curriculum for a sense of belonging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2021

Kathryn Riley Open the ORCID record for Kathryn Riley [Opens in a new window]  and
Lynden Proctor
Kathryn Riley*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Lynden Proctor
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Public Schools, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: kathryn.riley@usask.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Physical education (PE) is a site that brings categories of difference under erasure, presenting a wicked problem for how a sense of belonging is cultivated for all learners to foster physical activity, health and wellbeing across the lifespan. This article explores how, we, as two teachers of PE, turned to postqualitative and ‘new’ materialist inquiry to generate a sense of belonging within a PE/environmental education nexus. Taking up Karen Barad’s agential realism and Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s rhizome, we conceptualise this PE/environmental education nexus as a transdisciplinary approach to curriculum that enacts a knowing/being/thinking/doing between, and across, borders, boundaries, categories, fields and practices. We then show how this nexus was actualised in our teaching practices through two vignettes. As transdisciplinary approaches to curriculum are grounded in the lived, embodied and embedded (micro) politics of location, individuals are imbued with affective obligation to enact affirmative patterns of relating moment-to-moment. This means that a sense of belonging is always imminent, invented and co-created, bringing attention to situated obligations to enact good relations with ourselves, each other and wider planetary systems.

Keywords

material/discursive entanglementsnew materialismphysical education/environmental education nexuspostqualitative researchrhizomic assemblages of relationssense of belongingtransdisciplinary approaches to curriculum
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 38 , Special Issue 3-4: Post-qualitative inquiry: Theory and practice in environmental education , September 2022 , pp. 267 - 278
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations, 92(92), 56–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York & West Sussex: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brendtro, L.K., Brokenleg, M., & Van Bockern, S. (2005). The circle of courage and positive psychology. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 14(3), 130.Google Scholar
Calderon, D. (2014). Speaking back to manifest destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 24–36. DOI 10.1080/13504622.2013.865114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D.A.G., & Mcphie, J. (2020a). Tensions, knots, and lines of flight: Themes and directions of travel for new materialisms and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 26(9-10), 1231–1254. DOI 10.1080/13504622.2020.1825631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D.A.G., & Mcphie, J. (2020b). New materialisms and environmental education: Editorial. Environmental Education Research, 26(9-10), 255–1265. DOI 10.1080/13504622.2020.1828290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Coulthard, G.S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis: Minnesota.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, G.S., & Simpson, L.B. (2016). Grounded normativity/place-based solidarity. American Quarterly, 68(2), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., & Barratt Hacking, E. (2020). Research handbook on childhoodnature: Assemblages of childhood and nature research. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Massumi, B., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
De Line, S. (2016). All my/our relations: Can posthumanism be decolonized? Open! Platform for Art, Culture and the Public Domain Retrieved from http://onlineopen.org/all-my-our-relations.Google Scholar
Deloria, V. (1999). Spirit & reason: The vine deloria, jr., reader. Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, N.J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Design, methods and the research assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 99–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green Schoolyards America (2021). Field report: A year of learning outside — national COVID-19 Outdoor Learning Initiative [webinar]. Retrieved from: =https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8QHZvmxWck.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, P., & Hart, C. (2019). Changing mindsets: Becoming planetary. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(4-6), 270–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C., & Lury, C. (2013). Re-turning feminist methodologies: From a social to an ecological epistemology. Gender and Education, 25(6), 786–799. DOI 10.1080/09540253.2013.829910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, H.H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED316506.pdf.Google Scholar
Jukes, S., Stewart, A., & Morse, M. (2021). Following lines in the landscape: Playing with a posthuman pedagogy in outdoor environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 1–16. DOI 10.1017/aee.2021.18 Google Scholar
Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645. DOI 10.1080/09518398.2013.788753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liboiron, M. (2021). Pollution is colonialism. Durham & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. DOI 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, K., Tesar, M., & Arndt, S. (2020). Theorising posthuman childhood studies. Singapore: Springer Nature, 10.1007/978-981-15-8175-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, B. (2017). Methodology is content: Indigenous approaches to research and knowledge. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(14), 1392–1400. DOI 10.1080/00131857.2017.1298034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, R. (2014). Why movement matters. Retrieved from https://www.communityplaythings.com/resources/articles/2014/why-movement-matters.Google Scholar
Rautio, P. (2020). Post-qualitative inquiry: Four balancing acts in crafting alternative stories to live by. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 228–230. DOI10.1177/1077800420933297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H.W., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. DOI 10.1007/BF01405730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosiek, J.L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S.L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C., Oncescu, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2016). The potential of leisure education to address the ‘wicked problems’ prioritized in A Framework for Recreation in Canada. Leisure/Loisir, 40(3), 253–270. DOI 10.1080/14927713.2016.1252937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, L.B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, M. (2020). Riverlands of the Anthropocene: Walking our waterways as places of becoming. UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sport for Life (2019). Developing physical literacy: Building a new normal for all Canadians. https://sportforlife.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DPL-2_EN_web_November_2019-1.pdf.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, E.A. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward ‘post inquiry’. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–20. http://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/521 Google Scholar
St. Pierre, E.A., Jackson, A.Y., & Mazzei, L.A. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies & Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110. DOI 10.1177/1532708616638694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, K., & Mills, T. (2021). Affirmative ethics and affective scratchings: A diffractive re-view of posthuman knowledge and mapping the affective turn. Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research, 2(1), 200–223.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2014). Standing with and speaking as faith: A feminist-Indigenous approach to inquiry. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), 1–7. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/405/371 Google Scholar
Tinnell, J.C. (2012). Transversalising the ecological turn: Four components of Félix Guattari’s ecosophical perspective. Deleuze Studies, 6(3), 357–388. DOI 10.3366/dls.2012.0070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Z. (2014). Fish pluralities: Human-animal relations and sites of engagement in Paulatuuq, Arctic Canada. Études/Inuit/Studies, 38(1-2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of historical sociology, 29(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, E. (2014). A turn to where we already were? Settler inquiry, Indigenous philosophy, and the ontological turn. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Tuck, E., McCoy, K., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23. DOI 10.1080/13504622.2013.877708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2018). World urbanization prospects: Highlights. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Highlights.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations (n.d). Sustainable development goals: : Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/.Google Scholar
Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and nonhumans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Wildcat, D.R. (2005). Indigenizing the future: Why we must think spatially in the twenty-first century. American Studies, 36(3-4), 417–440.Google Scholar