Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:36:47.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science in an Indigenous School: Insight into Teacher Beliefs about Science Inquiry and their Development as Science Teachers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2015

Craig Rofe ,
Azra Moeed ,
Dayle Anderson  and
Rex Bartholomew
Craig Rofe*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
Azra Moeed
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
Dayle Anderson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
Rex Bartholomew
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
*
address for correspondence: Craig Rofe, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Email: Craig.rofe@vuw.ac.nz
Get access

Abstract

School science aspires for students to develop conceptual, procedural and nature of science understandings as well as developing scientific literacy. Issues and complexities surrounding the development of science curriculum for Indigenous schools in New Zealand is a concern as little is known about these aspects of science learning in wharekura (Māori Indigenous School). This paper draws upon the findings of an empirical study to address the call for research into effective practices for supporting Indigenous students in learning science. The study is part of a larger project investigating and extending our understanding about how New Zealand teachers’ conceptualise science and science inquiry (investigation). Two Māori teachers participated in the research as well as their class who were supported by two researchers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with teachers. This research reports the findings of how participating teachers’ conceptualise science inquiry and describes their perceptions of how and why their students should learn science and science inquiry. The paper also presents teachers’ views about their own development as science teachers and suggests two models to address the issue of science teaching in wharekura.

Keywords

Indigenous science educationMāori science educationscience teacher educationscience inquiryMāori science teacher development
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , August 2016 , pp. 91 - 99
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. (2014). The nature and influence of teacher beliefs and knowledge on the science teaching practice of three generalist New Zealand primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 45 (3), 395–423. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9428-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18 (3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In Appleton, K. (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Association for Science Teachers and Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bishop, R., & Glynn, T. (1999). Researching in Māori contexts: An interpretation of participatory consciousness. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 20 (2), 167–182. doi.org/10.1080/07256868.1999.9963478.Google Scholar
Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, H., Hipkins, R., & Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by science: A paper commissioned by the royal society and the prime minister's chief science advisor. Retrieved November 11, 2015, from New Zealand Council for Educational Research: http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/inspired-by-science.pdf.Google Scholar
Friedrichsen, P., Van Driel, J.H., & Abell, S.K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95 (2), 358–376. doi.org/10.1002/sce.20428.Google Scholar
Glynn, T., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., & Macfarlane, A. (2010). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Māori students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39 (1), 118.Google Scholar
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36 (15), 2534–2553. doi:10.1080/0950069950170310.Google Scholar
McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: Culture, language and science education for indigenous students. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (2), 227–241.Google Scholar
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000325861.Google Scholar
Millar, R. (2010). Practical work. In Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (2nd edn., pp. 108–134). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2007a). Pütaiao i roto i te Marautanga o Aotearoa. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2007b). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Moeed, A. (2015). Science investigation: Students views about learning, motivation, and assessment. Springer: Singapore. DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-384-2.Google Scholar
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (9), 1049–1079. doi.org/10.1080/095006903200003 2199.Google Scholar
Pihama, L., Cram, F., & Walker, S. (2002). Creating methodological space: A literature research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26 (1), 30–43.Google Scholar
Rata, E. (2012). Theoretical claims and empirical evidence in Māori education discourse. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44 (10), 1060–1072. doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00755.x.Google Scholar
Sharples, P. (1994). Kura kaupapa Māori. In McQueen, H. (Ed.), Education is change (pp. 11–21). Wellington: Bridget Williams.Google Scholar
Smith, L.T. (1995). Kaupapa maori research. Paper presentation at Te Matawhanui Hui, Palmerston North, Massey University.Google Scholar
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. (2005). Māori in the science curriculum: Developments and possibilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37 (6), 851–870. doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00162.x.Google Scholar
Stewart, G.M. (2007). Kaupapa Māori science (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. (2011). Science in the Māori-medium curriculum: Assessment of policy outcomes in Pūtaiao education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43 (7), 724–741. doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00557.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A., & Lewthwaite, B. (2008). Māori science education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3 (3), 625–662. doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9089-x.Google Scholar
Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M.C., McConney, A., Maor, D., & Schibeci, R. (2013). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for Indigenous and non-Indigenous students in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Research in Science Education, 43 (1), 233–252. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9265-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar