Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:07:48.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amnesic mental models do not completely spill the beans of deductive reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

J. Martin-Cordero  and
M. J. González-Labra
J. Martin-Cordero
Affiliation:
Facultad de Psicologla, Universidad National de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain, jmadruga@uned.es
M. J. González-Labra
Affiliation:
Facultad de Psicologla, Universidad National de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain, jmadruga@uned.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 773 - 774
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barwise, J. (1993) Everyday reasoning and logical inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16:337–38. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Barwise, J. & Etchemendy, J. (1989) Model-theoretic semantics. In: Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed: Posner, M.. MIT Press. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Bonatti, L. (1994) Why should we abandon the mental logic hypothesis? Cognition 50:17–39. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Bonatti, L. (In press) Propositional reasoning by model? Psychological Review. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1993) Mental models cannot exclude mental logic and make little sense without it. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16:338–39. [LS]Google Scholar
Couturat, L. (1914) L'algèbre de la logique. Reprinted 1965: Georg Olms. [LS]Google Scholar
Davis, H. (1993) Deduction by children and animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:344. [LS]Google Scholar
Engel, P. (1993) Mental-model theory and rationality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16:345. [LS]Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1993) On rules, models, and understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:345–46. [rPNLJ, JMC]Google Scholar
Falmagne, R. J. (1993) On modes of explanation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 16:346–47. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Greene, D. W. (1993) Mental models: Rationality, representation, and process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:352–53. [JMC]Google Scholar
Haack, S. (1978) Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press. [LS]Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1955/1958) De la logique de l'enfant à la logique de l'adolescent. Presses Universitaires de France/The growth of logical thinking. Routledge & Kegan Paul. [LS]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1978) The meaning of modality. Cognitive Science 2:17–26. [LS]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press. [JMC]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993) Human and machine thinking. Erlbaum. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991) Deduction. Erlbaum. [rPNJL, JMC]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993) Précis of Deduction . Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:323–33. [rPNJL, JMC, LS]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J. & Schaeken, W. (in press) Why models rather than rules give a better account of propositional reasoning: A reply to Bonatti, and to O'Brien, Braine, and Yang. Psychological Review [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Mays, W. (1992) Piaget's logic. Archives de Psychologic 60:45–70. [LS]Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Garnham, A. (1989) Believability and syllogistic reasoning. Cognition 31:117–40. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P., Braine, M. D. S. & Yang, Y. (In press) Propositional reasoning by mental models? Simple to refute in principle and in practice. Psychological Review [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1950) Introduction à l'épistémologie génétique, vol. 1. Presses Universitaires de France. [LS]Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1992) Morphisms and categories Erlbaum. [LS]Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1995) Sociological studies. Routledge (in press). [LS]Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1974) Methods of logic. 3d ed. Routledge. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Ricco, R. (1993) Revising the logic of operations as a relevance logic: From hypothesis testing to explanation. Human Development 36:125–46. [LS]Google Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1994) The psychology of proof. MIT Press. [rPNJL]Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M. (1991) Logical forms. Blackwell. [LS]Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1993) Necessary knowledge. Erlbaum. [LS]Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. J. (1993) Models, rules, and expertise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:366. [LS]Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986) Thought and language. Revised ed. MIT Press. [LS]Google Scholar