No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The continuing evolution of ultrasocial economic organization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2016
Abstract
Ultrasociality, as expressed in agricultural, monetary, and fossil fuel economies, has spurred exponential growth in population and in resource use that now threaten civilization. These threats take the form of prisoner's dilemmas. Avoiding collapse requires more cooperative economic organization that must be informed by knowledge of human behavior and cultural evolution. The evolution of a cooperative information economy is one possibility.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Benkler, Y. (2002) Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal
112(3):369–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S. (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: Evidence from economic experiments. Science
320(5883):1605–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2004) The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology
65(1):17–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P. J. (2003) The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
100(6):3531–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cipriani, G. P., Lubian, D. & Zago, A. (2009) Natural born economists?
Journal of Economic Psychology
30(3):455–68. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, J. (2010) Ecological economics. In: The post carbon reader: Managing the 21st century's sustainability crises, ed. Heinberg, R. & Lerch, D., pp. 259–78. Watershed Media.Google Scholar
Farley, J. & Kubiszewski, I. (2015) The economics of information in a post carbon world. In: Free knowledge, ed. Hepting, D., pp. 199–222. University of Regina Press.Google Scholar
Farley, J. & Perkins, S. (2013) Economics of information in a green economy. In: Building a green economy, ed. Robertson, R., pp. 83–100. Michigan State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. & Fishchbacher, U. (2002) Why social preference matter – The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. The Economic Journal
112(478):C1–C33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in Public Goods experiments. The American Economic Review
90(4):980–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, B. & Schulze, G. G. (2000) Does economics make citizens corrupt?
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
43(1):101–13. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00111-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. & Regan, D. T. (1993) Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?
Journal of Economic Perspectives
7(2):159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gächter, S. (2007) Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In: Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field, ed. Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A., pp. 19–50. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H. (2000) Beyond Homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics. Ecological Economics
35(3):311–22. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00216-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E., eds. (2005) Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgässner, G. (2005) (Why) are economists different?
European Journal of Political Economy
21(3):543–62. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P. & Sousa, C. (2013) Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
121(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubiszewski, I., Farley, J. & Costanza, R. (2010) The production and allocation of information as a good that is enhanced with increased use. Ecological Economics
69(6):1344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, S. E. G. & Webley, P. (2006) Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
29:161–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwell, G. & Ames, R. E. (1981) Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics
15(3):295–310. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(81)90013-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustonen, M. (2003) Copyleft: The economics of Linux and other open source software. Information Economics and Policy
15(1):99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. & Highfield, R. (2011) SuperCooperators: Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. The Free Press/Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. (1998) Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L. & Goode, M. R. (2006) The psychological consequences of money. Science
314(5802):1154–56. doi: 10.1126/science.1132491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L. & Goode, M. R. (2008) Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science
17(3):208–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Malhotra, D. & Murnighan, J. K. (2011) Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning and Education
10(4):643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2007) Evolution for everyone: How Darwin's theory can change the way we think about our lives. Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Target article
The economic origins of ultrasociality
Related commentaries (26)
Agriculture and the energy-complexity spiral
Agriculture increases individual fitness
Autonomy in ants and humans
Biological markets explain human ultrasociality
Contributions of family social structure to the development of ultrasociality in humans
Differences in autonomy of humans and ultrasocial insects
Differentiation of individual selves facilitates group-level benefits of ultrasociality
Does ultrasociality really exist – and is it the best predictor of human economic behaviors?
Human agricultural economy is, and likely always was, largely based on kinship – Why?
Human and ant social behavior should be compared in a very careful way to draw valid parallels
Humans are ultrasocial and emotional
Laying the foundation for evonomics
Malthus redux, and still blind in the same eye
On the effectiveness of multilevel selection
Rome was not built in one day: Underlying biological and cognitive factors responsible for the emergence of agriculture and ultrasociality
Social insects, merely a “fun house” mirror of human social evolution
The continuing evolution of ultrasocial economic organization
The convergent and divergent evolution of social-behavioral economics
The day of reckoning: Does human ultrasociality continue?
The similarity and difference between ant and human ultrasocieties: From the viewpoint of scaling laws
Ultrasociality and the division of cognitive labor
Ultrasociality and the sexual divisions of labor
Ultrasociality without group selection: Possible, reasonable, and likely
Ultrasociality, class, threat, and intentionality in human society
Ultrasociality: When institutions make a difference
“If it looks like a duck…” – why humans need to focus on different approaches than insects if we are to become efficiently and effectively ultrasocial
Author response
Disengaging from the ultrasocial economy: The challenge of directing evolutionary change