Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:52:18.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differentiating robotic behavior and artificial intelligence from animal behavior and biological intelligence: Testing structural accuracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2002

Ralph R. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 rmiller@binghamton.eduarcedian@binghamton.edu
Francisco Arcediano
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 rmiller@binghamton.eduarcedian@binghamton.edu

Abstract

We emphasize the feature of Webb's presentation that bears most directly on contemporary research with real animals. Many neuroscience modelers erroneously conclude that a model that performs like an animal must have achieved this goal through processes analogous with those used by the animal. A simulation failure justifies rejecting a model, but success does not justify acceptance. However, an important benefit of models, successful or otherwise, is to stimulate new research.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)