Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:41:32.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implausibility versus misinterpretation of the FLMP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2000

Gregg C. Oden
Gregg C. Oden
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 gregg-oden@uiowa.edu www.cs.uiowa.edu/~oden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The case for the independence of featural processing supports Merge and FLMP alike. The target article's criticisms of the latter model are founded on misunderstanding its application to natural language processing. In fact, the main difference in the functional properties of the models is the FLMP's ability to account for graded perceptual experience. @T3:It is startling to be informed that beliefs you have held for a quarter of a century are indefensible and implausible. So it comes as a relief to discover that it was all just a big misunderstanding.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 344
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)