Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:59:06.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In partial defense of softness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2001

Daniel S. Levine
Daniel S. Levine
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019-0528 levine@uta.edu www.uta.edu/psychology/faculty/levine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors wish that the psychology of human decision making should borrow methodological rigor from economics. However, unless economics also borrows from psychology this poses a danger of overly limiting the phenomena studied. In fact, an expanded economic theory should be sought that is based in psychology (and ultimately neuroscience) and encompasses both rational and irrational aspects of decision making.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 421 - 422
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)