Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:18:10.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laying the foundation for evonomics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

David Sloan Wilson
David Sloan Wilson*
Affiliation:
Evolution Institute and Departments of Biology and Anthropology, State University of New York (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902. dwilson@binghamton.eduhttps://evolution-institute.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article is a major step toward integrating the biological and human-related sciences. It is highly relevant to economics and public policy formulation in the real world, in addition to its basic scientific import. My commentary covers a number of points, including avoiding an excessively narrow focus on agriculture, the importance of multilevel selection and complex systems theory, and utopic versus dystopic scenarios for the future.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. (2012) Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 35:125–29.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (2008) The superorganisms: The beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W. W. Norton. [Original Hardcover edition]Google Scholar
Okasha, S. (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pickett, K. & Wilkinson, J. B. (2009) The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1969) The ritual process. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Veelen, M., García, J., Sabelis, M. W. & Egas, M. (2012) Group selection and inclusive fitness are not equivalent; the Price equation vs. models and statistics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 299:64–80. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.025 Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2015a) Challenge to kin selectionists: Explain this! This View of Life. (Online article). Available at: https://evolution-institute.org/article/challenge-to-kin-selectionists-explain-this/?source=tvol Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2015b) Does altruism exist? Culture, genes, and the welfare of others. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. & Gowdy, J. M. (2013) Evolution as a general theoretical framework for economics and public policy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 90 (Suppl.):S3–S10. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. & Gowdy, J. M. (2015) Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: Foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics. Journal of Bioeconomics 17(1):37–52. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-;014-;9192-x Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A. & Embry, D. D. (2014) Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37(4):395–460. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001593.Google Scholar
Yaworsky, W., Horowitz, M. & Kickham, K. (2014) Gender and politics among anthropologists in the units of selection debate. Biological Theory 10(2):145–55. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0196-5 Google Scholar