Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:40:45.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A linguistic module for integrating the senses, or a house of cards?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Rick Dale  and
Michael Spivey
Rick Dale
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 rad28@cornell.eduspivey@cornell.edu http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/rad28 http://www.psych.cornell.edu/faculty/people/Spivey_Michael.htm
Michael Spivey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 rad28@cornell.eduspivey@cornell.edu http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/rad28 http://www.psych.cornell.edu/faculty/people/Spivey_Michael.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carruthers invokes a number of controversial assumptions to support his thesis. Most are questionable and unnecessary to investigate the wider relevance of language in cognition. A number of research programs (e.g., interactionist psycholinguistics and cognitive linguistics) have for years pursued a similar thesis and provide a more empirically grounded framework for investigating language’ cognitive functions.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , December 2002 , pp. 681 - 682
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)