Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T06:50:35.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mind and brain: an arduous task by neuroscience, physics, and philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Grover Maxwell
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn. 55455

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Eccles, John, Dewan, E. M., and others. The role of scientific results in theories of mind and brain: a conversation among philosophers and scientists, In: Globus, G., Maxwell, G., & Savodnik, I. (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry. Plenum Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Maxwell, G., Scientific results and the mind-brain issue, In: Consciousness and the Brain (see volume cited immediately above), 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, G., Rigid designators and mind-brain identity. In: Savage, C. Wade (ed.), Perception and Cognition: Issues in the Foundations of Psychology: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IX, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1978.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. H., Baron, R., & Nuwer, M. The holographic hypothesis of memory in brain function and perception. In: Atkinson, R. C., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. C., & Suppes, P. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1974.Google Scholar