Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:17:02.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acting is perceiving!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Rouwen Cañal-Bruland ,
John van der Kamp  and
Rob Gray
Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Affiliation:
Institute of Sport Science, Department of Sport Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07749 Jena, Germanyrouwen.canal.bruland@uni-jena.dewww.spowi.uni-jena.de/en/Sportpsychologie.html
John van der Kamp
Affiliation:
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlandsj.vander.kamp@vu.nlhttps://vu-nl.academia.edu/johnvanderkamp
Rob Gray
Affiliation:
Human Systems Engineering, Arizona State University–Polytechnic, Mesa, AZ 85212. robgray@asu.eduhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rob_Gray/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We challenge Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) narrow conceptualization of what perception is and – most important – what it is for. Perception guides our (inter)actions with the environment, with attention ensuring that the actor is attuned to information relevant for action. We dispute F&S's misconceived (and counterfactual) view of perception as a module that functions independently from cognition, attention, and action.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cañal-Bruland, R. & van der Kamp, J. (2015) Embodied perception: A proposal to reconcile affordance and spatial perception. i-Perception 6:63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dicks, M., Button, C. & Davids, K. (2010) Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72:706–20.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979/1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum. (Original work published in 1979 by Houghton Mifflin.)Google Scholar
Gray, R. (2002) Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28:1131–48.Google Scholar
Gray, R. (2010) Expert baseball batters have greater sensitivity in making swing decisions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 81:373–78.Google Scholar
Huys, R., Cañal-Bruland, R., Hagemann, N., Beek, P. J., Smeeton, N. J. & Williams, A. M. (2009) Global information pickup underpins anticipation skill of tennis shot direction. Journal of Motor Behavior 41:158–70.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. M. & Michaels, C. F. (2007) Direct learning. Ecological Psychology 19:321–49.Google Scholar
Mann, D. L., Abernethy, B. & Farrow, D. (2010) Action specificity increases anticipatory performance and the expert advantage in natural interceptive tasks. Acta Psychologica 135:17–23.Google Scholar
Mann, D. T. Y., Williams, A. M., Ward, P. & Janelle, C. M. (2007) Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 29:457–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (2008) Two visual systems reviewed. Neuropsychologia 54:774–85.Google Scholar
van der Kamp, J., Rivas, F., van Doorn, H. & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2008) Ventral and dorsal contributions in visual anticipation in fast ball sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology 39:100–30.Google Scholar