Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:01:38.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A.I and the methodology of scientific research: some cautions and limitations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Walter B. Weimer
Walter B. Weimer
Affiliation:
437 Bruce V Moore Building, University Park, Pa 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1978 , pp. 119 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hayek, F. A.The counter revolution of science: Studies of the abuse of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. (Revised Edition).Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, 91–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, G. Induction and empiricism: A Bayesian-frequentist alternative. In Maxwell, G. & Anderson, R. M. (Eds.), Induction, probability, and confirmation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975, 106–165.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R.The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.Google Scholar
Conjectures and refutations. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. E.Cognition, simulation, and the problem of complexity. Journal of structural learning, 1971, 2: 31–44.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J.Theory of self-reproducing automata. Ed. by Burks, A., Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Weimer, W. B. The psychology of inference and expectation: Some preliminary remarks. In Maxwell, G. & Anderson, R. M. (Eds.), Induction, probability, and confirmation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975, 430–486.Google Scholar
Manifestations of mind: Some conceptual and empirical issues. In Globus, G. G., Maxwell, G., & Savodnik, I. (Eds.), Consciousness and the Brain New York: Plenum Press, 1976, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scientific, inquiry, assessment, and logic: Comments on Bowers and Mahoney-DeMonbreun. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1977, 1: 247–255.Google Scholar
Hayek's approach to the problems of complex phenomena: An introduction to the theoretical psychology of The sensory order. In Weimer, W. B. & Palermo, D. S. (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes, Volume II. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978. In Press.Google Scholar