Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:46:10.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biopsychosocial and “complex” systems approach as a unified framework for addiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths
Affiliation:
Department of Gambling Studies, and Director, International Gaming Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, United Kingdom. mark.griffiths@ntu.ac.ukhttp://www.ntu.ac.uk/research/school_research/social/staff/51652gp.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The “unified framework” for addiction proposed by Redish and colleagues is only unified at a reductionist level of analysis, the biological one relating to decision-making. Theories of addiction may be complementary rather than mutually exclusive, suggesting that limitations of individual theories might be unified through the combination of ideas from different biopsychosocial “complex” systems perspectives.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 446 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allegre, B., Souville, M., Therme, P. & Griffiths, M. D. (2006) Definitions and measures of exercise dependence. Addiction Research and Theory 14:631–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. B. (1992) The myth of addiction: An application of the psychological theory of attribution to illicit drug use. Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Gambino, B. & Shaffer, H. (1979) The concept of paradigm and the treatment of addiction. Professional Psychology 10:207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, M. D. (2004) Sex addiction on the Internet. Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology and the Arts 7(2):188–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, M. D. (2005) A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use 10:191–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, M. D. (2006) An overview of pathological gambling. In: Mental disorders of the new millennium, vol. 1, ed. Plante, T., pp. 73–98. Greenwood.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. D. (2008) Videogame addiction: Fact or fiction? In: Children's learning in a digital world, ed. Willoughby, T. & Wood, E., pp. 85–103. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. D. & Delfabbro, P. (2001) The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: Contextual factors in research and clinical interventions. Journal of Gambling Issues 5:1–33. Available at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/feature/index.html.Google Scholar
Howitt, D. (1991) Concerning psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. M. (1995) Reinventing perversion: Sex addiction and cultural anxieties. Journal of the History of Sexuality 5:429–50.Google Scholar
Marlatt, G. A, Baer, J. S, Donovan, D. M. & Kivlahan, D. R. (1988) Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment. Annual Review of Psychology 39:233–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurran, M. (1994) The psychology of addiction. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992) Postmodern epistemology of practice. In: Psychology and postmodernism, ed. Kvale, S.. Sage.Google Scholar
Sunderwirth, S. G. & Milkman, H. (1991) Behavioural and neurochemical commonalities in addiction. Contemporary Family Therapy 13:421–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truan, F. (1993) Addiction as a social construction: A postempirical view. Journal of Psychology 127:489–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wanberg, K. W & Horn, J. L. (1983) Assessment of alcohol-use with multi-dimensional concepts and measures. American Psychologist 38:1055–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widyanto, L. & Griffiths, M. D. (2006) Internet addiction: Does it really exist? (Revisited). In: Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal applications, 2nd edition, ed. Gackenbach, J., pp. 1141–63. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zinberg, N. E. (1984) Drug, set, and setting: The basis for controlled intoxicant use. Yale University Press.Google Scholar