No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
But is it evolution…?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2011
Abstract
We applaud Müller & Schumann (M&S) for bringing needed attention to the problem of motivation for common non-addictive drug use, as opposed to the usual focus on exotic drugs and addiction. Unfortunately, their target article has many underdeveloped and sometimes contradictory ideas. Here, we will focus on three key issues.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
Hagen, E. H., Sullivan, R. J., Schmidt, R., Morris, G., Kempter, R. & Hammerstein, P. (2009) Ecology and neurobiology of toxin avoidance and the paradox of drug reward. Neuroscience
160(1):69–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahakian, B. & Morein-Zamir, S. (2007) Professor's little helper. Nature
450(7173):1157–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorensen-Forbey, J. S., Harvey, A., Huffman, M., Provenza, F., Sullivan, R. J. & Tasdemir, D. (2009) Exploitation of secondary metabolites by animals: A response to homeostatic challenges. Integrative and Comparative Biology
49(3):314–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. J. & Hagen, E. H. (2002) Psychotropic substance-seeking: Evolutionary pathology or adaptation?
Addiction
97(4):389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, R. J., Hagen, E. H. & Hammerstein, P. (2008) Revealing the paradox of drug reward in human evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
275:1231–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
But is it evolution…?
Related commentaries (1)
Drugs as instruments: A new framework for non-addictive psychoactive drug use