Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:03:52.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive ethology, over-attribution of agency and focusing abilities as they relate to the origin of concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Carolyn A. Ristau
Carolyn A. Ristau
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. car31@columbia.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carey's superb discussion of the origin of concepts is extended into the field of cognitive ethology. I also suggest that agency may be a default mechanism, often leading to over-attribution. The problem therefore becomes one of specifying the conditions in which agency is not attributed. The significance of attentional/focusing abilities on conceptual development is also emphasized.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 146 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carey, S. (2009) The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, Z. & Zuberbühler, K. (2009) Food-associated calling sequences in bonobos. Animal Behavior 77:1387–96.Google Scholar
Green, S. (1985) Dialects in Japanese monkeys: Vocal learning and cultural transmission of locale-specific vocal behavior? Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 38:304–14.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1976, rev. 1981) The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1992, rev. 2001) Animal minds: Beyond cognition to consciousness. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ristau, C. A. (1991) Aspects of the cognitive ethology of an injury-feigning bird, the piping plover. In: Cognitive ethology: The minds of other animals, ed. Ristau, C. A., pp. 91–126. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L. & Marler, P. (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28: 1070–94.Google Scholar
Slobodchikoff, C. N., Kiriazis, J., Fischer, C. V. & Creef, E. (1991) Semantic information distinguishing individual predators in the alarm calls of Gunnison's prairie dogs. Animal Behaviour 42:713–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodchikoff, C. N., Perla, B. S. & Verdolin, J. L. (2009) Prairie dogs: Communication and community in an animal society. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. J. (1977) The behavior of communicating. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T. T. (1967) Ecology of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) in the Masai-Amboseli Game Reserve, Kenya. Ecology 48:891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar