Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:41:37.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptualizing a sunset ≠ using a sunset as a discriminative stimulus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

Carol Slater
Carol Slater
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Alma College, Alma, MI 48801 cslater@alma.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glenberg offers two different accounts of embodied conceptualization. The first fails in cases where no direct bodily interaction is possible. The second fails in cases where the object in question cannot serve as a discriminative stimulus; moreover, it yields inappropriate content even in cases where it can be applied. Glenberg's disregard for the conceptual agenda set by the social world is also disquieting.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 37 - 38
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)