Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:19:57.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controversies in the study of word learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2002

Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205 Paul.Bloom@Yale.edu http://pantheon.yale.edu/~pb85/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How Children Learn the Meanings of Words (HCLMW) defends the theory that words are learned through sophisticated and early-emerging cognitive abilities that have evolved for other purposes; there is no dedicated mental mechanism that is special to word learning. The commentators raise a number of challenges to this theory: Does it correctly characterize the nature and development of early abilities? Does it attribute too much to children, or too little? Does it only apply to nouns, or can it also explain the acquisition of words such as verbs and determiners? More general issues are discussed as well, including the role of the input, the relationship between words and concepts, and debates over nativism, adaptationism, and modularity.

Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 1124 - 1130
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)