Article contents
Flaws in evolutionary theory and interpretation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2001
Abstract
We make three points. First, even if Finlay et al.'s proposed developmental mechanisms hold, there remains great scope for selection on specific brain structures. Second, the positive covariance among the size of brain structures provides far less support for the proposed developmental mechanisms than Finlay et al. acknowledge. Third, even if the proposed mechanisms are the primary size determinants for most brain structures, these structures should not be considered “spandrels.”
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2001 Cambridge University Press
- 2
- Cited by