Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:15:53.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How many representations of the body?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2007

Frédérique de Vignemont
Affiliation:
Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS-EHESS-ENS, 75005 Paris, France. fvignemont@isc.cnrs.frhttp://www.institutnicod.org/notices.php?user=de+Vignemont

Abstract

Based on functional differences, Dijkerman & de Haan (D&dH) emphasize the duality of somatosensory processing, and therefore of body representations. But how many body representations do we really have? And what kind of criterion can we use to distinguish them? I review here the empirical and conceptual difficulties in drawing such distinctions, and the way to progress.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermudez, J. L. (1998) The paradox of self-consciousness. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vignemont, F. (2006) Review of Shaun Gallagher's How the body shapes the mind. Psyche 12:1. (Online Journal publication.).Google Scholar
Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., Didic, M., Thinus-Blanc, C. & Poncet, M. (2003) Pointing to body parts: A double dissociation study. Neuropsychologia 41(10):1307–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, N. P. & Spence, C. (2006) Beyond the body schema: Visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness. In: Human body perception from the inside out, ed. Knoblich, G., Thornton, I. M., Grosjean, M. & Shiffrar, M., pp. 1564. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kammers, M. P. M., van der Ham, I. J. M. & Dijkerman, H. C. (2006) Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion depending on body representations. Neuropsychologia 44(12):2430–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzack, R. (1992) Phantom limbs. Scientific American 266(4):120–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard.Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, B. (1995) Proprioception and the body image. In: The body and the self, ed. Bermudez, J. L., Marcel, A. & Eilan, N.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paillard, J. (1999) Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Motor control, today and tomorrow, ed. Gantchev, G. N., Mori, S. & Massion, J., pp. 197214. Academic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Schwoebel, J. & Coslett, H. B. (2005) Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(4):543–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirigu, A., Grafman, J., Bressler, K. & Sunderland, T. (1991) Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing: Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain 114:629–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed