Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:41:20.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human drug addiction is more than faulty decision-making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Carl L. Hart  and
Robert M. Krauss
Carl L. Hart
Affiliation:
Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032 Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. clh42@columbia.eduhttp://substanceabuse.columbia.edu/hart.htmrmk@psych.columbia.eduhttp://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/commlab/
Robert M. Krauss
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. clh42@columbia.eduhttp://substanceabuse.columbia.edu/hart.htmrmk@psych.columbia.eduhttp://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/commlab/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We commend Redish et al. for the progress they have made in bringing a measure of theoretical order to the processes that underlie drug addiction. However, incorporating information about situations in which drug users do not exhibit faulty decision-making into the theory would greatly enhance its generality and practical value. This commentary draws attention to the relevant human substance abuse literature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 448 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Comer, S. D., Collins, E. D. & Fischman, M. W. (1997) Choice between money and intranasal heroin in morphine-maintained humans. Behavioural Pharmacology 8:677–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comer, S. D., Collins, E. D., Wilson, S. T., Donovan, M. R., Foltin, R. W. & Fischman, M. W. (1998) Effects of an alternative reinforcer on intravenous heroin self-administration by humans. European Journal of Pharmacology 345:13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doty, P. & de Wit, H. (1995) Effect of setting on the reinforcing and subjective effects of ethanol in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 118:19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foltin, R. W., Fischman, M. W., Brady, J. V., Capriotti, R. M. & Emurian, C. S. (1989) The regularity of smoked marijuana self-administration. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 32:483–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, C. L., Haney, M., Foltin, R. W. & Fischman, M. W. (2000) Alternative reinforcers differentially modify cocaine self-administration by humans. Behavioral Pharmacology 11(1):87–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, C. L., Haney, M., Vosburg, S. K., Comer, S. D. & Foltin, R. W. (2005) Reinforcing effects of oral Δ9-THC in male marijuana smokers in a laboratory choice procedure. Psychopharmacology 181:237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. L., Haney, M., Vosburg, S. K., Rubin, E. & Foltin, R. W. (2008) Smoked cocaine self-administration is decreased by modafinil. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:761–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatsukami, D. K., Thompson, T. N., Pentel, P. R., Flygare, B. K. & Carroll, M. E. (1994) Self-administration of smoked cocaine. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2(2):115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, S. T., Bickel, W. K. & Hughes, J. R. (1994) Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sciences 55:179–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, S. T., Heil, S. H. & Lussier, J. P. (2004) Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annual Review of Psychology 55(1):431–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosado, J., Sigmon, S. C., Jones, H. E. & Stitzer, M. L. (2005) Cash value of voucher reinforcers in pregnant drug-dependent women. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 13:41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stitzer, M. L., McCaul, M. E., Bigelow, G. E. & Liebson, I. A. (1983) Oral methadone self-administration: Effects of dose and alternative reinforcers. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 34:29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Substance Abuse and Mental Heath Services Administration. (2007) Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS Pub. No. SMA 7–4293. Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
Vandrey, R., Bigelow, G. E. & Stitzer, M. L. (2007) Contingency management in cocaine abusers: A dose-effect comparison of goods-based versus cash-based incentives. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 15:338–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilens, T. E., Faraone, S. V., Biederman, J. & Gunawardene, S. (2003) Does stimulant therapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder beget later substance abuse? A meta-analytic review of the literature. Pediatrics 111:179–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed